Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
2.00s
Tara M. Long v. Andrew M. Saul
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 29, 2020
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 23 2015) (as amended); Parra v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (citation omitted). 14 B.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGeorge Simmons v. Kilolo Kijakazi
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 16, 2022
Brown-Hunter v. … Grimm v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown917 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 18, 2012
.”); Nichols v. Brown, 859 F.Supp.2d 1118, 1136 (C.D.Cal.2012) (Otero, J.) … See Lucas v.
Cited 61 timesPublishedCharles Keller Cooper Jr. v. Toms
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 2020
See Carey v. … See El-Aheidab v. Citibank (S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRichard P. Alvarez v. Andrew M. Saul
District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2020
Laborin 7 v. Berryhill, 867 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2017) (emphasis in original) (quoting 8 Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489, 494 (9th Cir. 2015). … Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 11 1015 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Moore v. Comm’r Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOscar Rodriguez, Jr. v. Craig Koenig
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2021
See, e.g., 24 Brown v. … Under Rhines v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJennifer Herrington v. The Nature Conservancy
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2020
Provincial Gov’t of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Gaus v. … Green v. Amerada Hess Corp., 707 F.2d 201, 205 (5th Cir. 1983); see also Esperanza v. Shanklin Corp., No. 5:17–cv–2456–CAS–KK, 2017 WL 6520465, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2017); GranCare, LLC v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBiovail Laboratories, Inc. v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
463 F. Supp. 2d 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2006
See Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1471-72 (9th Cir.) … Steel Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCharles Williams v. Xavier Becerra
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2019
Blake v. … See Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDe Andre Lamont Locklin v. Tammy Campbel
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 2022
Gatlin v. … See, e.g., Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMizzell v. Paul Revere Life Insurance
118 F. Supp. 2d 1016 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 2000
In Kinstler v. First Reliance Standard Life Ins. … See White v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedJammie Lyn Cooley v. Martin O'Malley
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2025
Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035m 1039 (9th 9 Cir. 2008); see Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVincent Steib v. Sony Pictures Television Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2023
Brown v. Brotman Med. Ctr., Inc., 571 F. App’x 572, 574–75 (9th Cir. 18 2014) (citing Detabali, 482 F.3d at 1203). This is because the rights that FEHA 19 claims assert are “independent” of CBAs. Id. … Brown, 571 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJesus Torres v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2020
Ivey v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 26 U.S. 564, 569-72 (1972). A liberty interest may arise from the Constitution itself, by reason 27 of guarantees implicit in the word “liberty,” see, e.g., Vitek v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown518 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 1981
In Suzuki v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953).
Reversed on other grounds by Luther Tyars v. Dr. Richard Finner, Medical Director of Patton State Hospital, Patton, California, 709 F.2d 1274 (1983)Cited 8 timesPublished284 F. Supp. 2d 1250 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 25, 2003
Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1982). In addition, a negligent act by a person acting under *1254 color of state law does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. Daniels v. … See Krusesky v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedJose Monteroso Agustin v. Fereti Semaia, et al.
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 25, 2025
See Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2011). … See Laing v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownH. Christopher Barnes v. JFK Memorial Hospital, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 2022
Christopher Barnes v. JFK Memorial Hospital, Inc. Present: The Honorable JESUS G. … P. 41(b); Wolff v. California, 318 F.R.D. 627, 630 (C.D. Cal. 2016). A plaintiff must prosecute his case with “reasonable diligence” to avoid dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b). Anderson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn re Naturalization of Klajic
260 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 10, 1966
We have found only two cases that appear to apply to the factual situation before us: Grzymala-Siedlecki v. United States, 285 F.2d 836 (C.A.5th 1961), and Langhammer v. … Langhammer v. Hamilton, 295 F.2d 642, 647 , (C.A. 1st 1961). . Grzymala-Siedlecki v. United States, 285 F.2d 836, 838 (C.A. 5th, 1961). . § 313(a) (2) of the Act; 8 U.S.C.A. § 1424 (a) (2). . 8 U.S.C.A. § 1424 (d).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHangzhou Yilin Technology Research Co., Ltd. v. Zero Technologies, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2025
The Complaint asserts a single claim seeking review of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) decision cancelling Plaintiff's “ZEROLIQUID” trademark registration. … Costlow v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna