Case law

Lacy v. Lewis

123 F. Supp. 2d 533 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2000

Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1170 (9th Cir.1970). … Moore, 159 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.1998); Brown, 424 F.2d at 1170 .

Jackson v. Felker

729 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 23, 2010

They boarded another subway train and exited at a different station; Latoya remained with petitioner because he promised her more marijuana. … Fields v. Brown, 503 F.3d 755, 766-70 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc) (footnote omitted; footnote added), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1314 , 128 S.Ct. 1875 , 170 L.Ed.2d 752 (2008).

Moses Clark v. People of the State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 2022

See Brown v. … Rich v.

Bloom v. Vasquez

840 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 1993

The uniqueness of parricide cases and the uniqueness of defense attorneys defy an across-the-board application of trial strategy. … See Parker v.

United States v. DeMarco

401 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 25, 1975

See, e. g., United States v. Berrios, 501 F.2d 1207 (2d Cir. 1974); United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1973); United States v. Falk, 479 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1973); United States v. … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 351 U.S. 115, 124 , 76 S.Ct. 663, 668 , 100 L.Ed. 1003 (1956); Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U.S. 1, 14 , 77 S.Ct. 1 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1 (1956); United States v.

Joseph Bennett v. Ricardo Garcia

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 30, 2021

See Kamakana v. City and 24 || County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors 25 || Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … See 9 | Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010).

Toyling Maa v. Carnival Corporation and PLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 21, 2020

United States v. … Given that Princess operated the ship, Plaintiffs do not explain how Carnival could have participated in the boarding process, distributed personal protective equipment to those on board, or sanitized the ship

Loftus v. Primero Mining Corp.

230 F. Supp. 3d 1209 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 30, 2017

Mujica v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 381 F.Supp.2d 1164, 1171 (C.D. Cal. 2005) *1230 (quoting Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 401 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964)); see also Roe v. … Defendants provide no explanation for how the two web-pages are related to one another or how content on the "San Dimas Mine” page is incorporated by reference to Primero’s "Board of Directors” webpage. Cf. Knievel v.

KEVIN IBN SCOTT v. LUIS MARTINEZ, Warden

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 27, 2026

See McDaniel v. 21 Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 131 (2010) (per curiam) (for a claim of insufficiency of the 22 evidence, “a reviewing court must consider all of the evidence admitted by the trial 23 court, regardless of whether … See Woods v.

Mozingo v. Craven

341 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 17, 1972

Ellhamer v. Wilson, 445 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1971); High Pine v. Montana, 439 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir.1971); Lincoln v. California Adult Authority, 435 F.2d 133 (9th Cir.1970); Mead v. … Connecticut State Board of Parole, 443 F.2d 1079 (2nd Cir.1971), vacated, as moot, 404 U.S. 879 , 92 S.Ct. 196 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 .

Ryan Dodson v. Patrick Covello

District Court, C.D. California · May 24, 2021

See Brown v. … See Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 22 400, 418 (1988) (“[T]he lawyer has—and must have—full authority to manage the 23 conduct of the trial.”); United States v.

G.D. ex rel. Dien Do v. Torrance Unified School District

857 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 8, 2012

Constituted a FAPE The Supreme Court held in Board of Education v. … C.P. v.

In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership Litigation

223 F. Supp. 2d 1142 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2002

Wool’s presumption of collective action when there is misleading “group published information” is equally applicable to members of the board of directors in a corporate fraud action. Blake v. … Mills v.

Bernard Steven Green v. Patrick Lovello

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 10, 2023

Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 331-33 24 (2010); Brown v. … v.

Duncan v. Calderon

946 F. Supp. 805 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 27, 1996

In Landgraf v. … Before the 1953 decision in Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953), a federal court could not review a claim that had been fully and fairly adjudicated on the merits in state court.

John Baleja v. Northrop Grumman Space and Mission Systems Corp. Salaried Pension Plan

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 13, 2022

In his letter to 16 the Board, Mr. … See, e.g., Cent v. Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz, 541 U.S. 739, 15 747 (2004). 16 15.

In Re the Complaint of Paradise Holdings, Inc.

619 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 26, 1984

Co. v. … See also Kuntz v.

Sascha B. Koch v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2025

Koch v. … (b)).”’); Jackson v. Brown, No. 1:13-CV-1055-LJO-SAB, 2015 WL 5522088, at *10, n.8 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2015), opinion amended and superseded in part, 134 F. Supp. 3d 1237 (E.D.

Michael Carnell Windon v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 2023

Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 2 1284 (9th Cir. 1996); see also Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489. 12 C.

Mack West, Jr. v. Psychologist D. Livesay

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 2022

Hartmann v. … Board operates in a manner that is chronically violative of due process.”