Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

3,916 results

2.34s

  • Anthony Nuño v. Deborah Boschini et al.

    District Court, C.D. California · May 29, 2026

    He must “establish that the law and facts clearly 23 favor [his] position, not simply that [he] is likely to succeed.” Id. … In light of this 27 finding, the Court declines to reach the merits of Nuño’s claim or Defendants’ 28 alternative argument that sovereign immunity prevents an injunction against CSUB. 1] B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Talia Thorsen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2020

    Except as otherwise provided in this 2 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 3 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 12 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pelayo v. City of Downey

    570 F. Supp. 2d 1183 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 2008

    The proposed pleading which accompanied the motion to permit the filing of a second amended complaint named 'The Estate of Russell’ as an additional defendant and clearly and unequivocally reduced the amount of the recovery … immunity. 120 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Micheaux Fortson v. County of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2024

    If only a portion or portions of the material on 10 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12 … If only a portion or portions of the material 22 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 24

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Walking U Ranch, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Elizabeth Reed v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 20, 2020

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 7 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 8 without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Orantes-Hernandez v. Meese

    685 F. Supp. 1488 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 1988

    The need for permanent injunctive relief is clearly established by defendants’ persistence in engaging in conduct violating both the letter and spirit of the preliminary injunction and their failure to take corrective measures … The comprehensive evidence before this Court clearly establishes transfers in the face of such established relationships. 50.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Christopher Sadowski v. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2020

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 25 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 8 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 9 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 10 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coplin v. Conejo Valley Unified School District

    903 F. Supp. 1377 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 1995

    The initial burden of establishing that there is no genuine issue of material fact lies with the moving party. … You would then have had a record of denial establishing a violation of your rights.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Kaori Doling v. Toridoll Dining California, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 29, 2020

    Except as otherwise provided in this 2 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 3 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 23 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pieszak v. Glendale Adventist Medical Center

    112 F. Supp. 2d 970 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 2000

    Pieszak’s Burden to Establish Pretext. … The Court held that a plaintiff can establish a rebuttable presumption of discrimination by showing "(i) that [the plaintiff] belongs to a racial minority; (ii) that [the plaintiff] applied and was qualified for a job for

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Cory Anderson v. BMW of North America, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 2023

    However, Judge Wilner is familiar enough with SBA cases to 19 understand that business-related materials and documents with consumer info require 20 [ The parties must provide a statement establishing good cause for … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 19

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Steven Beltran v. Cedars-Sinai Health System

    District Court, C.D. California · May 24, 2023

    It argues that it qualifies as a “person” under the statute and has acted under a federal officer. Id. at 10-13. … Cedars-Sinai contends that since establishing a patient portal, it “has continually met the Meaningful 1 The Court GRANTS Cedars-Sinai’s unopposed request for judicial notice.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Smith-Emery Co.

    906 F. Supp. 2d 1043 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 2012

    Taken together, defendant argues that plaintiffs fail to carry their burden of establishing the essential elements of their claim. … Under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6), these records all qualify as records of a regularly conduct activity.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vernon Rubidoux v. Pam Ahlin

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 6, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 4 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 15 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 16 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 17 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robert Fish v. Tesla, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 2021

    Except as otherwise provided in this 17 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 18 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 19 material … If only a portion of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 27 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 1 need

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. California Stem Cell Treatment Center, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 30, 2022

    The adipose tissue Defendants 21 remove from patients clearly consists of human cells. … Congress enacted the Equal Access to Justice Act under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 6 (“Section 2412”) to limit the United States government’s immunity to an 7 award for costs and fees.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maria Silang v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 2020

    Except as otherwise provided in this Order, 19 or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that qualifies for 20 protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the 9 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 11 (b

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • David Herskovitz v. Crestbrook Insurance Company

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 5, 2022

    Except as otherwise provided in 6 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 7 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 8 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rosely Zapon v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Jun 11, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 6 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 16 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 17 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.