Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

3,916 results

1.06s

  • Margarita Munoz v. Nissan North America, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2023

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 7 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 17 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 18 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 19 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Naturalization of Klajic

    260 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 10, 1966

    Petitioner’s testimony, corroborated by the testimony of an expert witness *810 on his behalf, clearly demonstrates that the Narodna Omladina Jugoslavije functioned primarily as an organization to foster social and athletic … stimulate discussion and then he chose economics as his subject.” 12 With such activities described, as we have noted in Lang-hammer as “lethargic and militarily prescribed”, the alien in Grzymala-Siedlecki was held to be qualified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pacira BioSciences, Inc. v. Ventis Pharma, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 13, 2025

    Designations 3 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 4 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose 5 unnecessary expenses and burdens … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 25 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 26 without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2024

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 … This provision is not intended to modify 28 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 2 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure 3 of

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Denise S. v. George Foreman

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2023

    If only a 17 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 18 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 19 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 2 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 3 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 4

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Future Income Payments, LLC

    252 F. Supp. 3d 961 · District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 2017

    Edles, Established by Practice; The Theory and Operation of Independent Federal Agencies, 52 Admin. L. … Most importantly, Future Income Payments has not articulated clearly what purpose would be served by granting a stay. The Ninth Circuit has denied interlocutory review in CashCall. (Ninth Circuit Order, Exh. 4.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry

    709 F. Supp. 1516 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 1989

    Plaintiffs contend that these conflicts establish that the FLSA preempts California labor provisions. … than the minimum wage established under this chapter or a maximum workweek lower than the maximum workweek established under this chapter____” 29 U.S.C. § 218 (a).

    Reversed on other grounds by Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry, 918 F.2d 1409 (1990)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lanard Toys Limited v. Laltitude LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 1 (b) for testimony

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kierra Thomas v. Nissan North America, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 15, 2023

    Except as otherwise provided in 24 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 25 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 26 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 6 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Christopher Goertemiller v. County of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 4 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 5 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 6 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jane Doe 2 v. Officer S. Merrill

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 18, 2021

    If only a portion 16 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 17 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 18 margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 8 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 9 without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tavin Padilla v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 3 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 4 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 Il without prior privilege review. 12 12.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gunner Concrete, Inc. v. ProAll International Manufacturing, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 10, 2024

    Except as otherwise provided in 5 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 6 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 7 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 15 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Creative Photographers, Inc. v. Line Financial Health Network

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 2024

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9 … If only a 18 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 19 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 20 || in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. Andrew Pitsicalis

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 19, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 12 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 13 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 24 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Laurie Vargas v. Walmart, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · May 25, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 15 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 25 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 26 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 27 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rasheed Joel Hilson, Sr. v. I. Mijares

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2020

    III, § 5 of the California Constitution did not 7 constitute a waiver of California's Eleventh Amendment immunity). … A plaintiff can establish an equal protection claim 7 either by showing that he was intentionally discriminated against based on his membership 8 in a protected class, see Lee v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Michell Nguyen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 2023

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9 … If only a portion of the material 18 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 19 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • John Martinez v. Trojan Battery Company, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Laurence Cherniak v. John Doe 1

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 12, 2023

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 5 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.