Case law

Patricia Rue v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 23, 2020

Plaintiff alleged 5 disability due to auto immune disease, immune deficiency, chronic migraines, 6 blood coagulation defect, hypothyroidism, and vertigo. (AR 68-69, 87-88.) … A finding of non-severity at step 12 two must be “clearly established by medical evidence.”

National Resources Defense Council v. United States Department of Defense

388 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · May 25, 2005

To qualify for protection under the deliberative process privilege, a document must be both: (1) “predecisional” and (2) “deliberative.” Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. … The Court notes that documents "do not qualify as deliberative simply by labeling them as drafts.” Wilderness Soc’y, 344 F.Supp.2d at 14 .

Alejandro Campos Jr. v. City of Fullerton

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material 25 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 26 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 27 … If only a portion 12 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 13 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g.,

Andrew Left v. Anson Funds Management LP

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 2026

If only a portion or portions 12 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 21 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 22 privilege review.

Kournikova v. General Media Communications, Inc.

278 F. Supp. 2d 1111 · District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2003

Therefore, Kourni-kova clearly has standing to pursue a false endorsement claim. b. … GMC maintains that this clearly intimates that the photos were not voluntarily posed. (Mot. at 7).

Kupetz v. CONTINENTAL ILL. NAT. BANK & TRUST CO.

77 B.R. 754 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 1987

Clearly it was. … Notably, Shelton did not contact the bank before discounting the value of Adashek's assets and guarantee. [8] The evidence at trial did not clearly establish whether the payment to Marmon was made under the letter of credit

Andrew Left v. Anson Funds Management LP

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 2026

If only a portion or portions 12 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 21 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 22 privilege review.

Lanard Toys Limited v. Laltitude LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 1 (b) for testimony

Jay Stevens v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 31, 2024

If only a 15 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 16 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 17 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Michell Nguyen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9 … If only a portion of the material 18 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 19 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20

Carole Bodney v. Nissan North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins).

Paviell Johnson v. Green Dot Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 2021

CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 13 declaration, establishing … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion

Grigorii Fedorov v. Warden Adelanto ICE Processing Center

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 2025

Lewis, 989 F.2d 1021, 1025-26 (9th Cir. 1993) (“next friend” must clearly establish by meaningful evidence that the detained person is incompetent to assert his own rights). … Marina Fedorova therefore has not established that she qualifies for “next friend” status.

ENG v. County of Los Angeles

737 F. Supp. 2d 1078 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 24, 2010

On July 14, 2009, the Court stayed proceedings pending resolution of Defendants’ Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on the issue of qualified immunity. (Dkt. # 144.) … Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) (establishing mixed-motive analysis).

Angel Jose Velasco v. City of El Monte

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 2019

If only a portion or 5 || portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 6 identify the protected portion(s) (¢.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 16 appropriate markings in the margins

Bulletin Displays, LLC v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

448 F. Supp. 2d 1172 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2006

A challenged “act” qualifies for protection under the statute if it falls into one of four categories: “(1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other … Moreover, as the anti-SLAPP statute has been described as establishing a rule of “substance,” rather than procedure, New.Net, 356 F.Supp.2d at 1099 , applying it to federal claims arguably would permit state law to affect

Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry

709 F. Supp. 1516 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 1989

Plaintiffs contend that these conflicts establish that the FLSA preempts California labor provisions. … than the minimum wage established under this chapter or a maximum workweek lower than the maximum workweek established under this chapter____” 29 U.S.C. § 218 (a).

In re Naturalization of Klajic

260 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 10, 1966

Petitioner’s testimony, corroborated by the testimony of an expert witness *810 on his behalf, clearly demonstrates that the Narodna Omladina Jugoslavije functioned primarily as an organization to foster social and athletic … stimulate discussion and then he chose economics as his subject.” 12 With such activities described, as we have noted in Lang-hammer as “lethargic and militarily prescribed”, the alien in Grzymala-Siedlecki was held to be qualified

Estate of Dominick Alvarado v. The State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 3, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 2 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 28 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 1 production without prior privilege review.

Gary Agosto v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 29, 2021

If only a portion of the material on a page 20 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 22 protected portion … If only a portion of the material on 5 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 6 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 7