Case law

Beale v. GTE CALIFORNIA

999 F. Supp. 1312 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 24, 1996

First, as explained below, the Second Amended Complaint clearly shows that Plaintiffs’ race and national origin discrimination claims are time-barred and that no additional discovery can save them. … Law Governing the Establishment of a Prima Facie Case A plaintiff may establish a prima facie ease of discrimination through either circumstantial evidence or direct evidence. Wallis, 26 F.3d at 889 .

Savage Rabbit Distributing, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · May 12, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in 4 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 5 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 6 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 14 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Gipson v. Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc.

972 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 1997

Furthermore, the court must view the evidence presented to establish these elements “through the prism of the substantive evidentiary burden.” Anderson v. … Such a worker may qualify as a seaman only if the craft is in actual navigation at the time of the accident.” Thomas J.

Burger v. Astrue

536 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2008

The Commissioner has promulgated regulations establishing a fivestep sequential evaluation process for the ALJ to follow in a disability case. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 . … Height’s testimony presents clinical signs that clearly refute the opinions of [Dr. Tarter,] which are not well supported.” A.R. 13.

Stephen H. Bafford v. Northrop Grumman Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 10, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material 3 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party should seek to clearly identify 4 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) … If only a 16 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 17 Party should seek to clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 18 appropriate markings

Derrick Munzel Wright Jr v. Omar Covarrubias

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2021

CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by 24 declaration, establishing … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16

Dominique Daniels v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 4, 2021

Except as otherwise 2 provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of 3 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be 4 clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on 24 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 25 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26

Estate of Jennifer Joan Vyden v. Vista Del Sol LTC, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 5, 2021

This immunity is broad. … distribution, sale, donation, purchase, marketing, promotion, packaging, labeling, licensing, use, any other aspect of safety or efficacy, or the prescribing, dispensing, or administration by qualified

Family Home & Finance Center, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

461 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 2, 2006

These unsupported conclusions are clearly outside the scope of Mr. Gallagher’s personal knowledge. Plaintiffs have produced no other admissible evidence sufficient to support these conclusions. … The common interest privilege is a qualified privilege that applies to a publication made without malice if “the communicator and the recipient have a common interest and the communication is of a kind reasonably calculated

Estate of Adam Preston Adams v. County of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 13, 2025

If only a 26 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 27 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 28 || markings in the margins … If only a 10 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 2 11 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate x 12 || markings

HENRY MORALES v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY K. MULLINS

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 12 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 24 24 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 25

Eric Rios v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 1 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 2 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 3

Bovarie v. Giurbino

558 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 2008

A federal court making the “unreasonable application” inquiry asks “whether the state court’s application of clearly established federal law was objectively unreasonable.” … The only definitive source of clearly established federal law under the AEDPA is the holdings (as opposed to the dicta) of the Supreme Court as of the time of the state court decision.

Johnathin James Onello v. Sheriff Chad Bianco, in his individual and official capacities; County of Riverside, a public entity; Riverside County Sheriff’s Department; and Does 1-25

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in x 12 || this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection > 13 |}under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is … If only a portion or portions of 9 || the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly n 10 ||identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

Packaging Systems, Inc. v. PRC-Desoto International, Inc.

268 F. Supp. 3d 1071 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2017

PPG argues that Plaintiff has not established any element of a claim for secret unearned discounts. … Plaintiff need not establish such harm for its claim under California Business & Professions Code section 16727 as long as it can establish that PPG had the requisite market power in the tying market. Morrison v.

Daniel Garces v. City of Redondo Beach

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 9, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 8 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 9 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 24 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

United States v. William Nelson

District Court, C.D. California · May 14, 2025

for protection must be clearly designated before 6 disclosure or production. … If only a portion 9 qualifies, the protected portion(s) must be clearly identified (e.g., by margin 10 markings).

Christopher D. Sawyer v. Riverside County Sheriff’s Department; Chad Bianco; Dennis Vroom; Flakes; Riverside University Health System; and Does 1 thru 10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings … If only a portion or portions of 6 || the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7 \|identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

Kupetz v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago

77 B.R. 754 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 1987

Clearly it was. … The evidence at trial did not clearly establish whether the payment to Marmon was made under the letter of credit or was a direct payment by Wolf & Vine.

RYAN P. WALTERS, an Individual v. State of California, by and through the California Highway Patrol, Beau Biter, Enrique Ayala, John Betz, and Brandon Urrutia

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 14, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify 16 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 17 production without prior privilege review.