Case law

Veen v. Davis

326 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 2, 1971

Ferdon v. … save in the most unusual and horrendous of State law enforcement or judicial harassment, have more than enough to keep us busy without butting into the States’ regulations and prosecutions in the trivialities of school board

Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

112 F. Supp. 3d 1011 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 30, 2015

Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir.2007) (“Review is generally limited to the cqntents of the complaint, but a court can consider a document on which .the complaint relies if the document is central to the plaintiffs claim … See, e.g., Jeandron v. Board of Regents of University System of Maryland, 510 Fed.Appx. 223, 227 (4th Cir.2013) (Unpub. Disp.)

United States v. Rubin

312 F. Supp. 950 · District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 1970

In United States v. … In Gold v.

Sahra M. v. Andrew M. Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 8, 2020

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 14 || F.3d at 492 (citations omitted).

Alliance Capital Management L.P. v. County of Orange (In Re County of Orange)

189 B.R. 499 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 12, 1995

Pursuant to this provision, Orange County’s Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 94-675 in June 1994, authorizing issuance of up to $200 million in TRANs. … Fed.R.Bankr.P. 8013; Steelcase Inc. v. Johnston (In re Johnston), 21 F.3d 323, 326 (9th Cir.1994).

Moroccanoil, Inc. v. Marc Anthony Cosmetics, Inc.

57 F. Supp. 3d 1203 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2014

Corp. v. … Moroccanoil also points out that both companies’ oil treatments come in clear-brown bottles, with turquoise blue prominently featured in both. There are differences as well.

Chrysler Corporation v. Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc.

303 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 1969

However, in Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc. v. … Trail Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., supra, Ford Motor Co. v. Weibel, supra, Dodge Bros. v. East, 8 F.2d 872 (D.C. N.Y.1925).

Veronica S. v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2026

Brown- 18 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015). General or implicit 19 findings of credibility will not suffice; the ALJ must show his work. Smartt, 53 20 F.4th at 499; see also Treichler v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 24 F.3d at 489.

Raul Cervantes Valenzuela v. V. Torres

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 2022

CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) Date: September 2, 2022 Title: Raul Cervantes Valenzuela v. V. Torres, et al. … P. 41(b); Omstead v. Dell, Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating standard applied in dismissal for failure to prosecute); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S.

D.K. Ex Rel. Kumetz-Coleman v. Huntington Beach Union High School District

428 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 2006

Collinsgru v. Palmyra Board of Education, 161 F.3d 225, 231 (3rd Cir. 1998). D.K. and his parents make two arguments in support of their ability to proceed in this action pro se. … Lucht v.

Pace v. Quintanilla

308 F.R.D. 644 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 2015

M & B allegedly failed to audit EGC’s financial statements according to the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). … Holdings, Inc. v.

Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. BPI Communications, Inc.

378 F. Supp. 2d 1189 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 7, 2005

Times Co. v. … In Brown v.

United States v. Brian E. Brewton

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2020

See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58, 85 S.Ct. 248, 23 13 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964); see also Crystal v. United States, 172 F.3d 1141, 1143-1144 (9th 24 Cir. 1999); United States v. … Jose, 131 F.3d 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1997); Fortney v.

James C. Howe v. Martin Gamboa

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2022

In Ground One, Petitioner contends that the 9 Board of Parole Hearings (the “Board”) violated recent California law by 10 considering his prior convictions in concluding that he was not suitable for 11 parole, and … App’x 616, 617 4 (9th Cir. 2012) (claim that the Board’s decision was not supported by some 5 evidence in violation of petitioner’s due process rights was foreclosed by 6 Cooke); Johnson v. Sec’y of Cal.

Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co.

78 F.R.D. 108 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 1978

Dayco Corp. v. … See Windham v.

Lanard Toys Ltd. v. Novelty, Inc.

511 F. Supp. 2d 1020 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 2007

Berge v. … Brown, Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1476 (9th Cir.1992).

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.

985 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 1997

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323 , 106 S.Ct. at 2552-53 ; *956 British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 951 (9th Cir.1978). … Inc. v.

In Re Amgen Inc. Securities Litigation

544 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2008

The data safety monitoring board stopped the study because of a higher rate of blood clotting in patients randomized to the normal-level group. (Id.) … Defendant Sharer was, at all relevant times, Amgen’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. (CAC, 1! 14.)

Madden v. Independence Bank

771 F. Supp. 1510 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 1991

In late May 1989, Fulvio Dob-rich became Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Independence Bank. … Douglas v. Anderson, 656 F.2d 528, 534 (9th Cir.1981).

Askia Sankofa Ashanti v. State of California, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 2026

Lopez v. … See City of Grants Pass v.