Opinion

Raul Cervantes Valenzuela v. V. Torres

Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
Sep 2, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.4%

stating courts may dismiss an action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) sua sponte for a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the court’s orders

How later courts described this case

  • stating courts may dismiss an action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) sua sponte for a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the court’s orders
  • stating standard applied in dismissal for failure to prosecute
  • ordering dismissal for failure to comply with court orders

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Case 2:19-cv-07559-CJC-KK Document 118 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:776

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) Date: September 2, 2022

Title: Raul Cervantes Valenzuela v. V. Torres, et al.

Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DONNISHA BROWN Not Reported

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Present None Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed

for Failure to Follow Court Orders

I.

BACKGROUND

On August 29, 2019, Plaintiff constructively filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Section 1983”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). On September 27, 2019, the

Court issued an Initial Civil Rights Case Order advising Plaintiff that “[a]s long as this action is

pending, [P]laintiff must immediately notify the court (and the defendants or the defendants’

attorneys) of any change in [P]laintiff’s address and the effective date.” Dkt. 11 at 3 (emphasis in

original). Plaintiff was advised that if he “fails to keep the court informed of a correct mailing

address, this case may be dismissed under Local Rule 41-6[.]” Id. Local Rule 41-6 provides:

If mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff’s address of record is returned

undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days of the service date,

such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of his current

address, the Court may dismiss the action with or without prejudice for want of

prosecution.

L.R. 41-6.

On August 17, 2022, mail that was directed to Plaintiff’s address of record on August 3,

2022 was returned undeliverable by the Postal Service with a notation that Plaintiff had been paroled

on July 26, 2022. Dkt. 115.

II.

Page 1 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk dsb

Case 2:19-cv-07559-CJC-KK Document 118 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:777

DISCUSSION

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the Court may dismiss an action with prejudice

for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with any court order. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

Here, Plaintiff has failed to notify the Court, in writing, of his current address.

Consequently, under Rule 41(b), the Court may properly dismiss the instant action without prejudice

for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Omstead v. Dell,

Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating standard applied in dismissal for failure to

prosecute); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)

(stating courts may dismiss an action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) sua sponte

for a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the

court’s orders); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) (ordering dismissal for

failure to comply with court orders). However, before dismissing this action, the Court will afford

Plaintiff an opportunity to explain his failure to file a notice of change of address as directed by the

Initial Civil Rights Case Order.

III.

ORDER

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with court orders. Alternatively,

Plaintiff may respond to this Order by submitting a Notice of Change of Address advising the Court

and opposing parties of his current address. As set forth in the Court’s Initial Civil Rights Case

Order, Plaintiff shall mail the Notice of Change of Address to “Clerk, U.S. District Court, 3470 12th

Street, Riverside, CA 92501.”

Plaintiff shall have up to and including October 3, 2022, to respond to this Order. Plaintiff

is cautioned that failure to timely file a response to this Order will be deemed by the Court

consent to the dismissal of this action without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Page 2 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk dsb

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.