Case law

John Doe v. County of Santa Barbara

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 10, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 20 appropriate markings in the margins

Norman Gainer v. County of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 27, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 7 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without

Sally Eagleman v. Naphcare, Inc., an Alabama Stock corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 16 … If only a portion of the material on 28 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 1 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 2 (

Cristine Wick v. Everbridge, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2026

To the extent practical, if only 9 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 10 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 11 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 6 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Ahmad Bonner v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2025

If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Skechers USA, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 2019

If only a 24 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 25 ||clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 26 || margins). 27 … If only a portion of the material on a page 8 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 9 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10

Pulsar Products, Inc. v. Wall Box Chargers, S.L.; Wallbox N.V.; Wallbox USA Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 2026

If only a portion or 12 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 25 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

CK Franchising, Inc. v. Central Valley Care, Inc., et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 25, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on 7 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 8 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 9 … If only a portion or portions of the material on 23 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 24 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 1

Job Asad v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 13, 2023

The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Davien Long v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 3 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 4 without prior privilege review.

Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.

211 F. Supp. 3d 1244 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2016

The website allows class members to print forms, submit claims for store credit in lieu of cash payment, upload proof of additional qualifying purchases, and submit Opt-Out Requests. … In sum, under the circumstances, the requested fee award out of the common fund established by the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable. B. Costs.

Burger v. Astrue

536 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2008

The Commissioner has promulgated regulations establishing a fivestep sequential evaluation process for the ALJ to follow in a disability case. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 . … Height’s testimony presents clinical signs that clearly refute the opinions of [Dr. Tarter,] which are not well supported.” A.R. 13.

Manson v. Pitchess

317 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 1970

At page 1042, the Court states: “Here appellant clearly knew of his right. His ‘waiver’ lay in his assertion of his right to represent himself1 —a right the court could not properly deny. 28 U.S.C. § 1654 ; Bayless v. … To establish a violation of the due process clause appellant must prove that the delay precluded a fair determination of the charges against him. Odell v.

Michael Laughlin v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in 21 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 22 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 14 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jose Alvarado v. City of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 28 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 10 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 11

Martin Vargas v. United States of America

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2024

Arellano’s applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture—two forms of immigration protection that would have relieved Arellano from the risk of deportation.16 Arellano’s Qualified … Sovereign Immunity—FTCA The United States is immune from civil liability unless it consents to be sued. See Dalehite v.

Isabel Valdez v. City of Fontana

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 17, 2025

If only a portion or 4 | portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 5 | clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 6 | margins … If only a portion or 16 | portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 17 | clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 18 |

In re Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc.—Fair & Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) Litigation

300 F.R.D. 347 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2013

If a “ruinous liability” exception exists, therefore, Toys could likely qualify. … The contours of this class are clearly set forth and class membership can easily be determined by these criteria.

Joseph Davis v. Raymond Rosas

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material 17 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 18 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 19 … If only a portion or portions of 4 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 5 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 6

Claudia Chavez v. LAC and USC Medical Center

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 18, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 12 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 13 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 24 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins).