Opinion

Job Asad v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
Dec 13, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.5%

distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of court record

How later courts described this case

  • distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of court record
  • even stipulated protective orders require good cause showing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)

Tomio.Narita@wbd-us.com

JEFFREY A. TOPOR (SBN 195545)

Jeff.Topor@wbd-us.com

DOMINIC J. LUCA (SBN 337702)

Dominic.Luca@wbd-us.com

WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP

50 California Street, Suite 2750

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 433-1900

Facsimile: (415) 433-5530

Attorneys for Defendant

Acima Credit FKA Simple

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOB ASAD,

Case No. 2:22-cv-06412-JLS-RAO

Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER1

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC.; ACIMA

CREDIT FKA SIMPLE,

Defendants.

1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective

1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential,

proprietary or private information for which special protection from public

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may

be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to

enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this

Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to

discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends

only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment

under the applicable legal principles.

B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT

This action is likely to involve valuable research, development, commercial,

financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from

public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action

is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist

of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, information

regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential research,

development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy

rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or

which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or

federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to

expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over

confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties

are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable

necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to

address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a

parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons

and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been

maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it

should not be part of the public record of this case.

C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL

The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this

Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information

under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed

and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court

to file material under seal.

There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial

proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions,

good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and

County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Phillips v. Gen. Motors

Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics,

Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders

require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling

reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with

respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere

designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—

without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the

material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or

otherwise protectable—constitute good cause.

Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then

compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the

relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected.

each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced

under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking

protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal

justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting

the application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration.

Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in

its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted.

If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting

only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document

shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their

entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit.

2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the

designation of information or items under this Order.

2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of

how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for

protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in

the Good Cause Statement.

2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as

their support staff).

2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”

2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless

of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,

generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.

2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as

an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.

2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.

House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside

counsel.

2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or

other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a

party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and

have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm

that has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.

2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,

employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their

support staffs).

2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or

Discovery Material in this Action.

2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation

support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or

demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)

and their employees and subcontractors.

2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is

designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.”

2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery

Material from a Producing Party.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only

Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or

extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or

compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or

presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the

trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.

4. DURATION

Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as

CONFIDENTIAL or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced

as an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available to all

members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by

specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance

of the trial. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180-81 (distinguishing “good cause”

showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons”

standard when merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the

terms of this protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under

this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that

qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for

protection only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written

communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, items

within the ambit of this Order.

Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations

that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper

purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating

Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it

designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must

promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in

this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise

stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection

under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or

produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic

documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial

proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend

“CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that

contains protected material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for

protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s)

(e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated

which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and

before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be

deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the

documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then,

before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the

“CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a

portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

in the margins).

(b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party identifies

the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the

deposition all protected testimony.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and

for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on

the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the

legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information

warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the

protected portion(s).

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent

failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive

the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material.

Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable

efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this

Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a

designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s

Scheduling Order.

6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute

6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on

the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper

purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other

parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating

Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall

continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is

entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the

challenge.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this

Action only for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this Action. Such

Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the

conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a

Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL

DISPOSITION).

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons

authorized under this Order.

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless

otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a

Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated

“CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as

well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably

necessary to disclose the information for this Action;

the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(d) the court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters and their staff;

(f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional

Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;

(h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the

Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party

requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit A hereto; and (2) they

will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise

agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed

deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may

be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except

as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and

(i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,

mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions.

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED

IN OTHER LITIGATION

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation

that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification

shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order

to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the

subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include

a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be

pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with

the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this

action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the

subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s

permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking

protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions

should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action

to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE

PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a

Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information

produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the

remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be

construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to

produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is

subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s

(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party

that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality

agreement with a Non-Party;

(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated

Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably

specific description of the information requested; and

(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the

Non-Party, if requested.

(c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within

14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party

may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery

request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall

not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the

confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court.

Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and

expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed

Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this

Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in

writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts

to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or

persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order,

and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and

Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE

PROTECTED MATERIAL

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain

inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection,

the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever

procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production

without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and

(e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a

communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work

product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated

protective order submitted to the court.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this

Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to

disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this

Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any

ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.

12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material

may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the

specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material

under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information

in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court.

13. FINAL DISPOSITION

After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60

days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return

all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in

this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations,

summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving

Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same

person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies

(by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or

destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies,

abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any

of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing

transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert

reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such

materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or

constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in

Section 4 (DURATION).

14. VIOLATION

Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures including,

without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions.

//

//

//

//

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED 11/16/23

Kebut Sbtkea

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: December 7, 2023

CIP

Attorneys for-Defendant

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 13, 2023

Rayedis, a. Q2—

HON-SROZELLA A. OLIVER

United States Magistrate Judge

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of

_________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury

that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that

was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California

on [date] in the case of Job Asad v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No.

2:22-cv-06412-JLS-RAO. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms

of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to

so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt.

I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item

that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in

strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

Central District of California for enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and

telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with

this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective

Order.

Date: ______________________________________

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

Printed name: _______________________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.