Case law

Estate of Glenn McCrary, by and through his successors in interests, et al. v. Victorville Police Department, a public entity, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 3, 2025

If only a 2 11 || portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing = 12 || Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 || markings … If only a portion or portions of the 23 ||material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 24 |jidentify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings

Los Angeles Customs & Freight Broker Ass'n v. Johnson

277 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 1967

In the Larson case, two exceptions to the applicability of the general rule of sovereign immunity in cases in which Government officers are the nominal defendants are set forth. … In fact, the continued vitality of the line of authority relied upon by defendants herein was specifically confirmed and clearly distinguished from the situation in the Abbott case.

Elegant Outdoor Furniture, LLC v. Vego Innovations, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 2025

mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as 19 CONFIDENTIAL or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 20 ONLY” does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, 21 establishing … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 11 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 12

Cybiotronics, Ltd. v. Golden Source Electronics, Ltd.

130 F. Supp. 2d 1152 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2001

These Invoices clearly were dated on August 16 and 18, respectively. … These equivocal statements, and the exhibits to which Plaintiff cites, clearly do not establish what Plaintiff claims that they do, i.e., that Smoothline did transmit communications to New York and/or meet with NAFT in New

Pop Mart Americas Inc., Pop Mart (Singapore) Holding Pte. Ltd., and Beijing Pop Mart Cultural & Creative Co. Ltd v. 7-Eleven, Inc., Mayer Brothers Group, Inc. (d/b/a 7-Eleven Store No. 37950), Hrbs Enterprises, Inc. (d/b/a

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 17, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 9 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 20 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 21 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Tommy R. Mercurio v. Estate of Christopher Mercurio, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 14 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 26 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.

694 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 1988

However, plaintiff has the burden of establishing that local CRS markets are “relevant markets” if the conduct of the attempted monopolizer is ambiguous or not clearly predatory. … In this case, United’s conduct is ambiguous or not clearly predatory.

Jhonny Roldan v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 2024

If only a 12 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 13 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 25 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities Litigation

682 F. Supp. 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 25, 1987

Congress clearly has not intended to occupy the field of securities fraud regulation. … NMEC and Feldman make two additional arguments, but they are clearly without merit.

Miguel Solorio v. Careco, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 2024

If only a 27 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 28 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 1 markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 14 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15

Bornstein v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance

946 F. Supp. 814 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 27, 1996

[Insureds] may qualify under one certificate only. … The rule of law established is that if the death of the insured was objectively unexpected and unintended by the insured and happened out of the usual course of events, his death was accidental.

Hot Girl Walk LLC v. Fashion Nova, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 16, 2026

this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 19 produced. … If 13 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 14 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 15 appropriate markings in the margins

Terrence Johnson v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · May 9, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 28 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 1 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jane Doe v. Dhanuba Hospitality, Inc.; Pravin R. Ahir; Sureshbhai R. Ahir

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 7 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 A Party … If only a portion of the material on 18 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 19 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20 (b)

Hunter Kerhart v. United Best Sheet Metal, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 2025

If only a portion or portions 7 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 8 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 9 margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 26 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 27 prior privilege review.

Dezarae Munoz v. Chad Bianco

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 27, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the 4 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 5 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions of 19 || the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 |lidentify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 2022

If 4 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 5 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 6 appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 24 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 25 privilege review.

Pait Solutions LLC v. Dejant Group Corp.et al

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 13 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

Edwards v. Ollison

621 F. Supp. 2d 863 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 8, 2008

A federal court making the “unreasonable application” inquiry asks “whether the state court’s application of clearly established federal law was objectively unreasonable.” … The only definitive source of clearly established federal law under the AEDPA is the holdings (as opposed to the dicta) of the Supreme Court as of the time of the state court decision.

Amber Widby v. County of Los Angeles, Eli Vera, Angela Carrasco, and Does 1-20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2026

If only 27 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 1 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 2 making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).