Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

3.18s

  • Thomas Louis Bush v. C. Koenig

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2019

    Lindh v. … Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. denied Brown 13 v. Hatton, 139 S.Ct. 841 (2019) (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 14 (2007); Magwood v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Debra Jean Allen v. Nancy A. Berryhill

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 2020

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 16 2015) (as amended); Parra v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (citation omitted). 8 B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Krav Maga Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Yanilov

    464 F. Supp. 2d 981 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2006

    Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. Yellow Cab of Elk Grove, Inc., 419 F.3d 925, 928 (9th Cir.2005) (citing Filipino Yellow Pages, Inc. v. … In addition, the plaintiffs have submitted a declaration of Avi Moyel, manager and board member of IKMA, attesting to Yani-lov’s personal approval of the Admissions Letter when it was discussed and drafted by IKMA board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Paula D. Gotlibowski v. Nancy A. Berryhill

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2020

    Orn v. … Bray v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • First Surety Corp. v. Community Bank

    347 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 15, 1972

    Cook’s affidavit that the Schedule 14B Statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by each of the Fusselman directors on or about September 24, 1971, state that at a meeting of First Surety’s board of directors … Studebaker Corporation v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692 (2nd Cir. 1966). Partial summary judgment is therefore granted to defendants as to plaintiffs’ sixth and seventh claims.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michael L Lawson v. Kilolo Kijakazi

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 9, 2021

    See Orn v. … Mar. 20, 2019); see generally Brown-Hunter v. 14 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015) (“A clear statement of the agency’s 15 reasoning is necessary because we can affirm the agency’s decision to deny benefits 16

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Federal Deposit Insurance v. BancInsure, Inc.

    99 F. Supp. 3d 1084 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2014

    The letter then enumerates nine specific acts: (a) operating with management whose policies and practices are detrimental to the Bank and jeopardize the safety of its deposits; (b) operating with a Board of Directors (“Board … Co. v. F.D.I.C., 926 F.Supp.2d 1337, 1340 (N.D.Ga.2013); FDIC v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, 814 F.Supp. 1021, 1026 (D.Wyo. 1991); FDIC v. Zaborac, 773 F.Supp. 137, 143-44 (C.D.Ill.1991) aff’d sub nom. F.D.I.C. v. Am. Cas.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adrianne Bell v. DCFS Wateridge

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 8, 2025

    Brown v. Duringer Law 18 Grp. PLC, 86 F.4th 1251, 1254 (9th Cir. 2023) (internal quotation marks omitted); 19 Mothershed v. Justices of Supreme Court, 410 F.3d 602, 606 (9th Cir. 2005). The 20 U.S. … See Noel v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rannis v. Fair Credit Lawyers, Inc.

    489 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, C.D. California · May 23, 2007

    FTC v. Gill, 265 F.3d 944, 950, 958 (9th Cir.2001.) … Brown v. Mortgagestar, Inc., 194 F.Supp.2d 473 (S.D.W.Va.2002). The other case Defendant cites comes from a Bankruptcy Court in Georgia. In re Attorneys at Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 332 B.R. 66 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.2005).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • David Bakos v. Johnson and Johnson

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2019

    McCabe v. Gen. Foods Corp., 811 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1987). … CV 19-07336 PA (MAAx) Date September 11, 2019 Title David Bakos v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. The case cited by Removing Defendants, Brown v. Allstate Ins. Co., 17 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sullivan Equity Partners, LLC v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2023

    The Board of Public Works (“Board”) upheld this decision on appeal. Id. §{ 104. … Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976). Here, plaintiff first presented testimony and evidence, including regarding allegations of bias, at public hearings before the Board and the Bureau.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Richard Leon v. Nancy A. Berryhill

    District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2020

    its] judgment for that of the ALJ.’” 22 Ghanim v. … See Garrison v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Derrick L. Johnson v. Samantha P. Jessner

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2024

    People v Johnson, 2017 WL 10 1649732, at *5 (Cal. Ct. App. May 2, 2017) (affirming a failure-to-register 11 conviction sustained in 2015). … Brown v. 8 Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 67 (9th Cir. 2018) (“If the petition is second or successive, 9 then the district court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss the petition unless 10 and until the court of appeals grants

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Osborne v. County of Riverside

    385 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 1, 2005

    United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). Article III standing is an “indispensable part” of a plaintiffs case. Lujan v. … In Rivera v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Porch v. MASTERFOODS, USA, INC.

    685 F. Supp. 2d 1058 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2008

    Fletcher v. … See also Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dawn Renee Emerick v. Andrew Saul

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 19, 2021

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 11 2015) (as amended); Parra v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (citation omitted). 9 B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meta-Film Associates, Inc. v. MCA, Inc.

    586 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, C.D. California · May 14, 1984

    In Chern v. … Smith v.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • City of South Pasadena v. Slater

    56 F. Supp. 2d 1106 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 19, 1999

    (Decl. of Jan Chatten-Brown, Ex. 40 at 2 (1998 TIP).) 21 It lists the project as “Excluded prior to 10/01/98.” … (Decl. of Rossmann and Chat-ten-Brown, Ex. 5, p. 96.)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Aanestad v. Air Canada, Inc.

    382 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 1974

    This was reiterated in Susquehanna, etc., v. Blatchford, 11 Wall 172, 78 U.S. 172 , in 1870, where the court said: Susquehanna, etc. v. … It was so adjudged as early as 1808 in Chappedelaine v. Dechenaux, 4 Cranch 307 [306] 2 L.Ed. 629 * * * *. This ruling was followed in Childress v. Emory, 8 Wheat 669 [642], 5 L.Ed. 705 , and in Osborn v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cucci v. Edwards

    510 F. Supp. 2d 479 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 2, 2007

    Artusi is a Texas resident who became a member of Powerwave’s Board of Directors in December 2002, and served at all relevant times on the Company’s Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. … Plaintiff, citing Ginns v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.