Case law

Earl J. Washington and Lola Mitsuk v. Kyle Ryan James, Patrick Louis Topacio, Zachery S. Totten, Ashley Y. Martinez, Juan D. Mejia-Hernandez, City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 15, 2026

If only a 25 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 26 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 27 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party, also must clearly identify the protected 11 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Adrian Baghumyan v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 19 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 20 without prior privilege review.

Omar Rosales v. The Kroger Co.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a 24 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 markings in the

Zaira S. Azocar v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

R. White v. Michel Rey Moore

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 18, 2022

If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion of 8 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 9 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 10 markings

Steven Deese v. State Farm General Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 6, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 10 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 22 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

OLGA ZAMORA CABELLO v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 2026

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. 18 Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have … This provision is not intended 16 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 17

Boulware v. Marshall

621 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 9, 2008

“Clearly established Federal law” refers to the governing legal principle or principles set forth by the Supreme Court at the time the state court renders its decision. Lockyer v. … For purposes of habeas review under 28 U.S.C. section 2254 (d), Strickland sets forth clearly established Federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court. See Williams v.

Savage Enterprises v. Wheeler

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2025

If only a 23 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 24 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 25 markings in the margins … If only a 7 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 8 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 9 markings in the margins

Kristi Williamson v. The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2025

If only a portion of the 5 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 6 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 7 A Party … If only a portion of the 16 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 17 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18 (b)

L'Garde, Inc. v. Raytheon Space & Airborne Systems

805 F. Supp. 2d 932 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 26, 2011

Therefore, the Court finds the forum selection clause in the Letter Subcontract is too general to qualify as a mandatory forum selection clause. See Hunt Wesson Foods, 817 F.2d 75 . Calisher & Assocs., Inc. v. … Nor is national security so clearly implicated, as the disputed ISIS phase lacked a defense priority rating.

KELLY OCAMPO, an individual v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California public entity; and DOES 1-20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2026

If only a portion or portions 19 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions 3 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 5

Gabriel Hernandez v. City of Ontario and Does 1-10, Inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 8, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 13 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If 23 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 24 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 25 appropriate markings in the margins

LA Tech and Consulting v. American Express National Bank

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 2024

If only a portion 14 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 15 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 16 in the margins … If only a portion 26 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28 in the margins

Alex Lopez and Travell Woods, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc., and Does 1-50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this 17 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 18 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the 11 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 12 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 13

Colin Thatcher v. Serenade at River Park

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 8, 2024

If only 22 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 23 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 24 making appropriate markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Mahgerefteh v. City of Torrance

324 F. Supp. 3d 1121 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 27, 2018

These selling spaces are clearly not a designated public forum for expression. See Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. … Qualifying to sell at the Market does not automatically insure admission in the Market.

Lexis-Olivier Ray v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 3 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 4 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 5

Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City of Los Angeles

844 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 15, 1994

The court agrees with those analyses. *556 In the AHTA, Congress has established a guideline for the fees that may be charged air carriers. … The court concludes that^ while the Agreement clearly does not moot any other claim, it does moot the question of whether the City’s threat of a lockout violated the FAA or was otherwise illegal.

Noah Shumate v. City of Placentia, Officer Contreras, Officer Lemus, Sgt. Tom McKenzie, Chief Butts, Former Chief Leny

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 14, 2025

If only a 2 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 14 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 16