Case law

Compstar Insurance Services, LLC v. Summit Specialty Insurance Solutions LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 27, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 16 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 17 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 25 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 26 production without prior privilege review.

Stacey Wade-James v. Genzyme Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 25 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 9 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 10 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 11 markings in the margins)

Sean Singletary v. City of Santa Monica

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 19, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 24 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 25 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 12

Emsurgcare v. Unitedhealthcare Insurance Co.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 11 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 27 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 1

Young-Mi Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 15, 2023

Except as otherwise stipulated or : 14 || ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this E 38 15 || Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced … Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 20 || designation of confidentiality at any time prior to the close of the discovery period 21 || established by the Court. 22 6.2. Meet and Confer.

California Ex Rel. California Department of Toxic Services v. Neville Chemical Co.

213 F. Supp. 2d 1134 · District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2002

The factual background to this case is set forth in the March 26, 2002 Order. 3 .DTSC objects to the Johnson declaration on the grounds that he is not qualified as an expert. … The Court finds that Johnson is sufficiently qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education to testify as an expert pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 701. 4 .

Dennis P. Moyeda v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 4 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 15 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 16 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 17 in the margins).

David Ricks, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 12 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Chunma USA, Inc. v. West American Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2019

If only a 17 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 18 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 19 markings in the margins … If only a 2 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins

Amer Kuric v. Maker Learning Network

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 16, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 12 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 23 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Poinsetta Mark v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 19, 2025

If only a 13 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 14 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 15 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 25 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 26 27

Astrium, S.A.S. v. TRW, Inc.

254 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 25, 2003

Second, Astrium contends that OFC and Pilkington told Astrium that the UVR coating had been qualified by Lockheed. According to Astrium, the coating was not qualified by complete testing. … Robinson .clearly distinguishes this situation, where the purchaser freely enters into a contract and later accepts non-conforming goods, from the situation where the plaintiff was fraudulently induced to enter into the contract

Elber Flores v. Nissan North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 11, 2025

If only a 21 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 22 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 23 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions 6 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 8

Harvest Small Business Finance v. Evan Mitnick

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 13, 2024

If only a portion or 5 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins … The parties’ mere 1 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 2 material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or 3 otherwise protectable—constitute

Bhopinder Dhillon v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 17, 2021

If 14 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 15 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 16 appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 22 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 23 without prior privilege review.

Khary Lewis II v. American Express National Bank

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 11, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 15 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 16 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 17 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 12 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jason Boutros v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2023

If only a portion 14 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 15 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 16 markings in … If only a portion 26 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 27 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 28 markings in

Flyer Defense, LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 15, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 23 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 24 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 11

Saulsberry v. Chater

959 F. Supp. 1247 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 1997

Specifically, the plaintiff argues that messenger and delivery driver jobs are unskilled, and thus, do not qualify under Social Security regulations as requiring transferable skills. … The number of positions reported by the vocational expert clearly is a significant number. See Moncada v.

Trans-Continental Investment Corp., S. A. v. Bank of the Commonwealth

500 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 1980

It has no office or employee in California and is not qualified to transact business in this State. During the past three years, the Bank has had no more than three loans outstanding to borrowers located in California. … Although not clearly articulated, plaintiffs also appear to be contending that there is a split-basis for subject matter jurisdiction.