Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,916 results
0.27s
Gabriel Martinez v. Prime Source Building Products Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 2024
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 17 portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate
Cited 0 timesUnknownGina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 18, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 6 1 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 2 the protected
Cited 0 timesUnknownTarondra Nelson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 24, 2025
If only a portion 6 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins). … If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited Auto Credit Corporation v. Jessica Stewart
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2025
If only 21 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected … If only a portion or 14 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 15 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g.,
Cited 0 timesUnknownNatalie Gomez v. Senior Operations, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 28, 2024
If only a 21 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 22 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 23 in the margins). … If only a 5 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLauritzen v. Secretary of the Navy
546 F. Supp. 1221 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 1982
In the present case, this test has clearly been met. … Plaintiff asserts that the liability of the United States can be established under the “bad faith” exception to the general common law rule barring fee awards.
Cited 26 timesPublished21 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 13, 1995
Even if it were established that plaintiffs condition had deteriorated, this alone would not justify ignoring earlier medical reports pertaining to the same condition. … The record does not, however, include copies of the relevant documents nor does it clearly indicate the date of denial. (A.R.65).
Cited 5 timesPublishedAdam Cardenas v. City of Alhambra
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 17 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the
Cited 0 timesUnknownKyle McCune v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 13 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 26 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 27 without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMichael Gruen v. Joshua Richards
District Court, C.D. California · May 1, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 15 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 3 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 4 margins
Cited 0 timesUnknownDavid Walsh v. Innoba Holdings LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 2025
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 22 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6
Cited 0 timesUnknownCindy Flores v. City of Laguna Beach
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 3 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 4 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 14 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 15 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 16 markings in the margins
Cited 0 timesUnknownIcon Academy, LLC v. Hassan Mahmoud and Noa Techs – FZCO
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 2026
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 16 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 17 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 1 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 2 privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownShahzad Zakir v. T-Mobile USA, Inc
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2020
Except as otherwise provided 4 || in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery 5 | Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 6 || designated before the … If only a portion of the material on a page 13 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 14 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 15
Cited 0 timesUnknownLuna v. Hansen & Adkins Auto Transp., Inc.
313 F. Supp. 3d 1151 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 13, 2018
This qualifies as a stand-alone document for purposes of § 1681b(b)(2)(A). *1159 Marquez v. Bank of America, National Association , No. 17-CV-00555-CW, 2018 WL 1948864 , at *4 (N.D. … Plaintiff cites no authority establishing that the FCRA requires more than what is stated in the text of the statute. See generally Pl.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · May 28, 2026
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify 10 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 11
Cited 0 timesUnknownHarpers Pharmacy, Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation
District Court, C.D. California · Jul 12, 2024
Except as otherwise provided in 5 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 6 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 7 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion
Cited 0 timesUnknownRojas v. Brinderson Constructors Inc.
567 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 23, 2008
While the court does not purport to be an authority on the construction industry, it is sufficiently qualified to note that, ordinarily, the lowest bidder is also the winning bidder—that is the very nature of the process. … Far from suggesting such a result, the statute clearly predicates 2810 liability on actual or constructive knowledge.
Cited 3 timesPublishedValentina Sinisterra v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 8, 2026
If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 11 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 23 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins
Cited 0 timesUnknownKOR Services, LLC v. Thomson International Incorporated
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 2024
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 4 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 A … If only a portion of the material on 16 || a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 17 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna