Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

2.35s

  • Brandon Bibbs v. United States

    District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2020

    Younger, 401 U.S. at 46, 53-54; Brown v. … See Brown, 676 F.3d at 901.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Giash U. Kazi

    District Court, C.D. California · May 28, 2024

    See United States v. … Brown, Jr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sullivan Equity Partners, LLC v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2024

    On June 24, 2016, the Board of Public Works (the “Board”’) upheld this decision on appeal. Id. 128. … Ctr. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Real Estate Investment Trust

    529 F. Supp. 1300 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 1982

    See proxy rule 14a — 1(f) [ 17 C.F.R. § 240 .14a-l(f)]; SEC v. Okin, 132 F.2d 784 (2nd Cir. 1943); Studebaker Corporation v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692 (2nd Cir. 1966); Sargent v. … Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 396 U.S. 375, 391 , 90 S.Ct. 616, 625 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970); SEC v. Lincoln Thrift Association, 577 F.2d 600, 609 (9th Cir. 1978); SEC v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Karina Nunez v. Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 2019

    Ho holds the following licenses and board certifications: California Board of Psychology, Clinical Psychologist, License Number 22809; American Board of Professional Psychology, Board Certified in Clinical Child and Adolescent … Psychology; American Board of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Board Certified Pediatric Neuropsychologist; National Board of Forensic Evaluators, Board Certified Forensic Mental Health Evaluator.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr. v. Brian D. Phillips

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 30, 2023

    Marks v. Clarke, 102 F.3d 1012, 1017 n.8 (9th Cir. 1996); Haggerty v. Diaz, No. CV 12- 27 2219 DMG (JCG), 2013 WL 4718171 at *2 (C.D. Cal.). … Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 2 667, 676 (9th Cir. 2018) (“petitioner’s burden is higher” under statute to 3 bring successive habeas action); Prince v. Lizzaraga, 733 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Heffelfinger v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.

    580 F. Supp. 2d 933 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2008

    There was a ‘Change Review Board’ at the Seaside facility which had to approve all changes.... … Carmen v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City of Los Angeles

    844 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 15, 1994

    Co. v. … The strongest of these cases is Aerovías Interamericanas De Panama, S.A v. Board of County Comm’rs, 197 F.Supp. 230 (S.D.Fla.1961), rev’d on other grounds, 307 F.2d 802 (5th Cir.1962).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Toyota Motor Corp. Hybrid Brake Marketing, Sales, Practices & Products Liability Litigation

    890 F. Supp. 2d 1210 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2011

    See Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 426 U.S. 290, 303-304 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Servs., 277 F.3d 1166 , 1172 (9th Cir.2002). … Brown, 277 F.3d at 1173. Relying on Bussian v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • S. David Sedaghat v. Jerry Roles

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

    David Sedaghat v. Jerry Roles et al. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009); see Moss v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hernandez v. Craven

    350 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 1972

    This is not a ease where a defendant and counsel had become embroiled in such irreconcilable conflict that there was no cooperation or communication as in Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166 (9th Cir. 1970). … Note that in the Brown case the Court said: “Of course, a court is not required to provide an indigent accused with any particular attorney whom he may desire.” Id. at 1170 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

    Eleveurs, 729 F.3d at 948 (quoting Brown- Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 578-79 (1986)). … Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935), Brown—Forman Distillers Corp. v. NY. State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573 (1986), and Healy v. Beer Institute, 491 □□□□ 324 (1989).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Jmc Telecom LLC

    416 B.R. 738 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2009

    I previously mentioned to Richard Brown that *741 I believed the account was not a JMC account, but a third party account. ER 118. … Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir.2001).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Darwin Boggs v. Hunter’s Nursery, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2026

    (quoting Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 564 (1992))); Strojnik v. Pasadena Robles Acquisition, LLC, 801 F. … Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse, located at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rudolph Ellis v. Superior Court of California

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2021

    See, e.g., Rhoades v. … See, e.g., 13 Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir. 1982). Here, there is no indication that petitioner has 14 presented the instant claim to the California Supreme Court.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Santa Barbara Smokehouse, Inc. v. AquaChile, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 4, 2022

    Anderson v. … Scott v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gendron v. Saxbe

    389 F. Supp. 1303 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 7, 1975

    Hines v. … In Board of Regents v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Global Master International Group, Inc. v. Esmond Natural, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2024

    See United States v. … Old Person v. Brown, 312 F.3d 1036, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Richardson v. United States, 841 F.2d 993, 996 (9th Cir. 1988)); see also United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Erick Gallardo v. County of Orange et al.

    District Court, C.D. California · Jan 26, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009); see Moss v. … Id. at 694; see also Board of County Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (“We have consistently refused to hold municipalities liable under a theory of respondeat superior”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robert L. Davis v. David Holbrook

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 2024

    See Brown v. California 19 Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding that the CDCR is 20 entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity). Dkt. 17 at 5–6. … Pennhurst v. State Sch. & 9 || Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1984); C.N. v. Wolf, 410 F. Supp. 2d 894, 10 | 900 (C.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.