Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
2.23s
922 F. Supp. 1482 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 1996
On October 18, 1983, ACC applied to the California Department of Savings and Loan and to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board for approval to acquire Lincoln Savings and Loan Association (“Lincoln”). … See Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir.1982). Failure to exhaust on a single federal claim requires the dismissal of the entire action regardless of whether the remaining contentions have been exhausted.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re Syncor International Corp. Securities Litigation
327 F. Supp. 2d 1149 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 6, 2004
Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 , 104 S.Ct. 2229 , 81 L.Ed.2d 59 (1984) (citing Conley v. … Ronconi v. Larkin, 253 F.3d 423, 429 (9th Cir.2001).
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Milton Arbitrage Partners, LLC v. Syncor International Corp., 239 F. App'x 318 (2007)Cited 6 timesPublished57 F. Supp. 3d 1249 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 2014
See Henderson v. … In Christoff v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedChloe Villano v. Shashamane Group, LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 3, 2024
v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDivine Son Irvis v. Israel Jacquez
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 10, 2025
See, e.g., Doe v. … Woods v. Carey, 525 F.3d 886, 889 n.2 (9th Cir. 2008). Section 2241 permits a prisoner to challenge the manner in which the BOP is executing their sentence. See, e.g., Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownElectronic Memories & Magnetics Corp. v. United States
431 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 1977
V On September 29, 1975, plaintiff supplemented its original request, and sought, in addition to the Report of Investigation, the following: 1. … See Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., Inc:, 415 U.S. 1 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2020
Starr v. … Board of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. 10 v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404, 117 S. Ct. 1382, 137 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1997).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSuperclinics USA, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2023
Superclinics finds support for 28 this contention in Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 168 Cal. App. 4th 938 (2008). 1 (Id.) … Brown, 168 Cal. App. 4th at 960–61.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCalifornia Cosmetology Coalition v. Riley
871 F. Supp. 1263 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 1994
See Dowling v. … See United States v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOrange County Coastkeeper v. Griswold Industries
District Court, C.D. California · Nov 27, 2024
(the “State Water Board”), the Executive Officer 21 the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Regional Water Board”’), 22 ||the Regional Administrator of EPA Region IX, the U.S. … See, e.g., Hathorn v. Lovorn, 457 U.S. 255, 268 n.23 (1982) (Attorney General is not bound by cases to which he was not a party); Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Found.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBenson v. Long Term Disability Income Plan for the Employees of Xerox
108 F. Supp. 2d 1074 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 1999
See Eley v. … See Celotex Corp. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedOrange County Nursery, Inc. v. Minority Voting Trust (In re Orange County Nursery, Inc.)
523 B.R. 692 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 2014
In re SeaQuest Diving, LP, 579 F.3d at 423 -24 (citing Archer v. Warner, 538 U.S. 314, 323 , 123 S.Ct. 1462 , 155 L.Ed.2d 454 (2003); Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 138-39 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979)). … The Court looked behind the judgment, citing Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublished997 F. Supp. 1276 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 1998
Brown [v. … See id. at 798; Estate of Shockley v. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co., 130 F.3d 403 , 405 (9th Cir.1997);. Snow v. Standard Ins. Co., 87 F.3d 327, 331 (9th Cir.1996), quoting Atwood, 45 F.3d at 1323 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedAlishia Hopkins v. Kilolo Kijakazi
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2023
Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Jan 14, 2020
Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 25 2012). Another valid exception is when a prisoner raises a “colorable claim 26 of double jeopardy.” Stanley v. Baca, 555 F. … Brown, 676 8 F.3d at 901; Stanley, 555 F. App’x at 708. 9 10.
Cited 0 timesUnknownManhart v. City of Los Angeles, Dept. of W. & P.
387 F. Supp. 980 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 15, 1975
Seamen v. Spring Lake Park Independent School District No. 16, 363 F.Supp. 944, 945 (D.Minn.1973); United States v. Local 638, 337 F.Supp. 217, 220 (S.D. N.Y.1972). See King v. … See Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 542 , 91 S.Ct. 496 , 27 L.Ed.2d 613 (1971); Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Co., 444 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1971); Sprogis v.
Cited 11 timesPublished308 F. Supp. 1048 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 30, 1970
Dunn v. California Department of Corrections, 401 F.2d 340 (9th Cir., 1968). … Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 17 , 83 S.Ct. 1068, 1078 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJose Padro v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · May 26, 2026
See Kamakana v. City and 12 Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips ex rel. Ests. of Byrd v. 13 Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210–11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. … See 25 Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677–79 (9th Cir. 2010).
Cited 0 timesUnknown562 F. Supp. 752 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 1983
As we have noted, in Hellenic Lines v. … Fisher v. Agios Nicolaos V, 628 F.2d 308 (5th Cir.1980); DeMateos v. Texaco Inc., 562 F.2d 895 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978); Antypas v. Cia.
Cited 12 timesPublishedLisa Marie Hren-Fazzino v. The Superior Court of the State of California
District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2024
. Page v. … . Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2 2012). Additionally, an inmate may demonstrate that she or he faces 3 irreparable harm as a result of the ongoing state proceeding.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna