Case law

Daniel Rivera v. United States

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify … Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). 28 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established

Gerardo Ramon Cano Orozco, an individual v. City of Pasadena, Alejandro Loeza, Officer Cardenas, Officer Orozco, and Corporal Mulrooney

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 … If 28 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 1 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 2 appropriate markings in the margins).

William L. Snow v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2021

If only a portion of the 8 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 9 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 10 || margins). 11 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 24

Tyrone Johnson, individually, et al. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2025

If 6 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 7 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 8 appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or 19 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins

Cesar Puga v. City of Riverside, County of Riverside; and Doe Officers 1 – 10

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 24 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

Rossi v. Trans World Airlines

350 F. Supp. 1263 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 13, 1972

Rossi may have had an option, but he clearly made a definite decision by exercising his option to seek redress through the Pilot Board — and he adhered to that decision through a final judgment. … not decided under the procedure established herein. 5 .

Aram Muradyan v. Nissan North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 25 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 26 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

David Vaccaro v. Colibri Real Estate, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 15, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on 4 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 5 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 1 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 2 privilege review.

Mohammad Saleem Nasim v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 18 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 19 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 20

Antoinette Hanson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 19, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 25 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 8 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 9 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10

Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. BPI Communications, Inc.

378 F. Supp. 2d 1189 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 7, 2005

The Court finds David Weitzner is qualified as an expert. (Weitzner Decl. ¶¶ 2-3 (summarizing his experience in academia and the motion picture industry).) … Because Plaintiff cannot establish validity, the Court does not reach the "copying” element of the copyright infringement test. 12 .

George Lopez Ramirez v. City of Glendale

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 2020

Counsel have an obligation to 24 lay out their support clearly. Carmen v. San Francisco Sch. Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th 25 Cir. 2001). … Zeigler is entitled to 5 qualified immunity. (Id. at 7-8.)

Rosa Noyola v. Televisaunivision Management Co

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 5, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 23 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 6 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 7 markings in the margins).

Fernando Torres v. TheSize Surfaces USA, LLC, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 24 margins).

Human Rights Defense Center v. County of Riverside, Chad Bianco, Herman Lopez, Mike Koehler, Michael Moulton, and Bruce Phillips

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 29, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 12 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 18 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 19 without prior privilege review.

Marie Soria-Gomes v. Princess Cruise Lines, LTD.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 27, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions 26 || of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Barbara Jean Ingram and John Ingram Jr. v. County of Riverside, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 7 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 9

Marlo Van Oorschot v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America; Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 11, 2026

If only a 5 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 6 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

John RA DOE v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Temple Corporation of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 24 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 6 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 7 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 8 markings in the margins).

In re Cohen

551 B.R. 23 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2015

Findings of fact, however, are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. In re Chang, 163 F.3d at 1140. … By requesting that the State Court find that the FCO was, in its entirety, in the nature of a support order, the Support Application is clearly intended to establish or modify an order for a domestic support obligation.