Case law

SHERI SHELTON v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; and DOES 1-50

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2025

Order must 17 be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 18 2. … If only a portion 15 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 16 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 17 portion(s) (e.g.,

CAMBRIA COMPANY LLC v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 17 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Nicholas Antosca v. Henry Chaisson

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 25 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 26 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 27 margins

Yvette Price, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. First Financial Security, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 11 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 markings in the margins

New High Limited v. Daniel Guez; Amy Guez; Jericho Holding Co LLC; Mapleton Capital, LLC; and Does 1-10

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 24 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 10 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 11 prior privilege review.

United States v. Aguilar

783 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2011

That is, only entities that have characteristics like those that are the sine qua non of both agencies and departments qualify as ‘instrumentalities.’ ” Reply at 3. … Defendants acknowledge in a footnote that the OECD Convention establishes “that not all state-owned corporations satisfy the OECD definition....

Futuredontics, LLC v. Jenelly Rodriguez

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 23, 2026

If only a portion 28 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 1 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 2 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 13 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Josue Hernandez v. WM Wholesale, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 11 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 12 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 13 the … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(

Daniel Rivera v. United States

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify … Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). 28 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established

Gerardo Ramon Cano Orozco, an individual v. City of Pasadena, Alejandro Loeza, Officer Cardenas, Officer Orozco, and Corporal Mulrooney

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 12, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 … If 28 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 1 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 2 appropriate markings in the margins).

Tyrone Johnson, individually, et al. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2025

If 6 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 7 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 8 appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or 19 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21 in the margins

Ana Rogel v. Sprouts Farmers Market, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 2 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 3 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 4 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion

Cesar Puga v. City of Riverside, County of Riverside; and Doe Officers 1 – 10

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 24 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

Rossi v. Trans World Airlines

350 F. Supp. 1263 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 13, 1972

Rossi may have had an option, but he clearly made a definite decision by exercising his option to seek redress through the Pilot Board — and he adhered to that decision through a final judgment. … not decided under the procedure established herein. 5 .

Aram Muradyan v. Nissan North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 25 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 26 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

David Vaccaro v. Colibri Real Estate, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 15, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on 4 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 5 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 1 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 2 privilege review.

Douglas Malo and Jomaira Jaime v. County of Los Angeles, Deputy Fujino, and Deputies 1-10

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 22 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 23 without prior privilege review.

Mohammad Saleem Nasim v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 18 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 19 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 20

Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. BPI Communications, Inc.

378 F. Supp. 2d 1189 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 7, 2005

The Court finds David Weitzner is qualified as an expert. (Weitzner Decl. ¶¶ 2-3 (summarizing his experience in academia and the motion picture industry).) … Because Plaintiff cannot establish validity, the Court does not reach the "copying” element of the copyright infringement test. 12 .

George Lopez Ramirez v. City of Glendale

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 2020

Counsel have an obligation to 24 lay out their support clearly. Carmen v. San Francisco Sch. Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th 25 Cir. 2001). … Zeigler is entitled to 5 qualified immunity. (Id. at 7-8.)