Case law

Reynolds v. Cambra

136 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2001

The threshold question under AEDPA is whether petitioner “seeks to apply a rule of law that was clearly established at the time his state-court conviction became final.” Williams, 120 S.Ct. at 1511 . … The federal court making the “unreasonable application” inquiry asks “whether the state court’s application of clearly established federal law was objectively unreasonable.”

Pablo Canales v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 2026

If only a 4 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 5 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 6 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 17 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

McGuire v. Times Mirror Company

405 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 8, 1975

Since Times Mirror will sell The Times directly to all consumers, there will be no price fixing; rather, there will simply be a publisher establishing the price at which it sells its own product to its customers. … Finally, the new systems proposed by Times Mirror will not have any effect on intrabrand competition, since plaintiffs have not established that such competition existed on more than a de minimis basis. *65 36.

John Doe A.W. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 9 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 10 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 11 in the margins).

De Von Hart v. Honeywell International, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 24 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 25 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 7 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 8 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 9 in the margins).

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Comcast Corp.

821 F. Supp. 2d 1135 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2011

Student Registration qualifies as prior art to ... the '120 patent. … The Federal Circuit said that “Student Registration clearly discloses the ‘cue suppression’ decision. In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Litigation, 639 F.3d 1303, 1323 (Fed.Cir.2011).

Diego Basile, professionally known as ATLXS, an individual v. CBMG, LLC, doing business as BROKE, a Delaware limited liability company, DOES 1-10 inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 10, 2026

If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 24 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 8 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 9 appropriate markings in the margins).

Adam Andru Sutton v. Camden Development, Inc., Valerie Tilakamonkul, Martin Doma, Anderson Hernandez Adame, and Paul Nguyen

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 2026

If only a portion of the material 9 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 11 A … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 21 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Carol Mendizabal v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2020

If only a 5 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 6 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 7 markings in the margins … If only a 17 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 18 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 19 markings in the margins

Jadelyn Feilke v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Corporation doing business in California; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 8 the … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 24 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 25 margins

Magnesystems, Inc. v. Nikken, Inc.

933 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 1996

al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 0.404[1] at 118) (“after the law of the case is determined by a superior court, the inferior court lacks authority to depart from it, and any change must be made by the superior court that established … The Federal Circuit held that because the district court's validity finding was interlocutory, it was not a final judgment immune from the other court’s invalidity finding.

Brejeik Barrow v. City of Inglewood; Officer Gleb Shein; Officer Elias Alvarez; Officer Peter Lopresti

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 27, 2026

The parties’ mere designation of material as 15 “CONFIDENTIAL” does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 16 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as 17 … If only a portion of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19

Maria Cardenas v. City of Santa Ana, a municipal corporation; and Does 1-50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 19, 2026

If only a 13] portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 14] also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 27

Tracy Hill, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Pretty Litter, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 23 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 24 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 25 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 4 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

AMMANUEL MUZGEBE, an individual v. CONSOLIDATED DISPOSAL SERVICE, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this 25 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 26 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 18 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Nayrika Debora Masjedi v. United States of America

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 2021

As stated above, Plaintiff’s allegation 9 that she is suffering these restraints along with all other Californians, and/or all other 10 Americans is insufficient to establish that she has standing to seek … The United States has not waived its sovereign immunity for suits brought under 12 the civil rights statutes, and such claims are barred by sovereign immunity. See Morse v.

Chloe Temtchine v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Experian Information Solutions, LLC; Equifax Information Services, LLC; and Trans Union, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2025

If only a portion of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 12 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 24 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 25 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Susilo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

796 F. Supp. 2d 1177 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 21, 2011

ETS contends that the “case law is split as to whether subsection (d) provides for a qualified or absolute privilege under Section 47,” but that “the public policy reasoning for affording trustees such immunity flows directly … Additionally, plaintiff alleges that the FAC sufficiently establishes fraud, malice, and oppression as used in Cal.Civ.Code § 3294(a). Id. at 4.

Cervantez v. Celestica Corp.

253 F.R.D. 562 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2008

Accordingly, the objections are overruled as to Exhibit F, which is clearly relevant and is an admission from Defendants’ own records. III. … Accordingly, Plaintiffs have established numerosity of the proposed security line class.

Josue Hernandez v. WM Wholesale, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 11 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 12 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 13 the … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(