Case law

Burbridge v. Sampson

74 F. Supp. 2d 940 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 1999

Background In the spring of this year, defendant South Orange County Community College District Board of Trustees (the “Board”) enacted Board Policy 5406 (“BP 5406” or the “Policy”), regulating the time, manner and place … Perry v.

Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc. v. City of Burbank

318 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 1970

Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 272 U.S. 605, 611 , 47 S.Ct. 207 , 71 L.Ed. 432 ; Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U.S. 740, 749 , 62 S.Ct. 820 , 86 L.Ed. 1154 . … See Castle v.

United States v. Solis

393 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 27, 1975

That case is Corngold v. United States, 367 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1966). … See United States v. Magana, 512 F.2d 1169 (9th Cir. Feb. 12, 1975); Ponce v. Craven, 409 F.2d 621, 625 (9th Cir. 1969). The court believes that Solis had such an expectation of privacy.

Jose Alfredo Gutierrez Esparza v. B. Braun Medical, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 2025

.”); Lee v. Am. Nat. Ins. … Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005).

Standard Drywall, Inc. v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n, Local 200

633 F. Supp. 2d 1114 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 8, 2009

(UAW) v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 619 F.2d 580 , 582, 584 (6th Cir.1980); Building Trades Employers’ Ass’n v. Marchell, No. 08 Civ. 4564, 2008 WL 2421634 at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 13, 2008); Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. v. … Corp. v. Mass. Laborers’ Dist. Council, 166 F.3d 11 (1st Cir.1999); J.F. White Contracting Co. v. Local 103 Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 890 F.2d 528 (1st Cir.1989) (Breyer, J.); Eshbach Bros., LP v.

United States v. County of Los Angeles

635 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, C.D. California · May 9, 1986

On March 28, 1985 the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) notified the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and Los Angeles County Counsel of the USAG’s intention to investigate conditions at the juvenile halls … Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. DeLaCuesta, 458 U.S. 141 , 102 S.Ct. 3014 , 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982). 10.

Mavis v. Commercial Carriers, Inc.

408 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 21, 1975

(i) Adams v. … v*- !

Briskin v. Ernst & Ernst

398 F. Supp. 997 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 3, 1975

A further meeting between McDevitt and the members of the Sloane board occurred in late November or early December 1968 in Los Angeles. … Robinson v.

United States v. Shell Oil Co.

13 F. Supp. 2d 1018 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 1998

In United States v. R.W. … See United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc., supra.

Woods v. Adams

631 F. Supp. 2d 1261 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2009

Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d at 919-924 . … See Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d at 919-924 . a.

Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande

796 F. Supp. 1320 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 30, 1992

In FDIC v. Henderson, 940 F.2d 465 (9th Cir.1991), the former president of a minority-owned bank sued federal bank regulators, whose actions allegedly resulted in his being fired by the bank’s board of directors. … County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F.2d 872 (9th Cir.1987), where the plaintiff claimed the decision of the board of supervisors was tainted by the bias of an individual board member.

In Re Alicia Marie Richards

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 2023

See, e.g., Cowan v. Brown, No. 16-56673, 2017 WL 5514688, at *1 (dismissing an appeal as duplicative when it challenged the same order as another appeal).

Francis v. California

326 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 1971

Contrary to the assertions, the testimony of Officer Brown was that Petitioner was told his rights and said he clearly understood them before making a statement on July 26, 1967 at 7 P.M. (C.T. 54-66). … Stout v. Cupp, 426 F.2d 881 (9th Cir. 1970); Wilson v. Anderson, supra. Sixth.

Somerset Marine, Inc. v. Forespar Products Corp.

876 F. Supp. 1114 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 25, 1994

Fortunately, no one on board was injured, and the JADEANTE, which allegedly suffered $100,-000 in damages, was insured. The insurer’s subrogee, plaintiff Somerset Marine, Inc. … Karshan v. Mattituck Inlet Marina & Shipyard, Inc., 785 F.Supp. 363, 365-66 (E.D.N.Y.1992); Lewinter v. Genmar Industries, Inc., 1993 A.M.C. 939 , 944-48 (Cal.Superior 1993); Sisson v.

Joy Johnson v. Navient Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 4, 2025

Corp. v. … Co. v.

Goleta Union Elementary School District v. Ordway

166 F. Supp. 2d 1287 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 2001

School Bd., 141 F.3d 524 , 529 (4th Cir.1998); Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in City & County of Denver, Colo., 233 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir.2000); Charlie F. v. Board of Educ., 98 F.3d 989 (7th Cir.1996); Heidemann v. … Porter v. Board of Tr. of Manhattan Beach Unif. Sch.

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Aerojet-General Corp.

263 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 23, 1966

The court in Todd Shipyards Corp. v. … The defendant company sought a re-submission of the dispute to the arbitration board with request for clarification of the award.

Turo Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2019

See Kamakana v. City and 12 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Phillips v. Gen. Motors 13 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); Makar-Welbon v. … Brown Matthew D.

Morales v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

531 F. Supp. 2d 1225 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 10, 2008

See Franchise Tax Board v. Constr. … Haug v. Bank of America, N.A., 317 F.3d 832 (8th Cir.2003); Krzalic v. Republic Title Co., 314 F.3d 875 (7th Cir.2002); Boulware, 291 F.3d at 268 .

Del Mundo v. Rosenberg

341 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 1972

On December 5, 1969, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the decision of the Special Inquiry Officer. … See Luk v. Rosenberg, 409 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1969); 8 C.F.R. 243.4.