Case law

Blixseth v. Brown (In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC)

841 F.3d 1090 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 2016

BLIXSETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, OPINION v. STEPHEN R. BROWN; GARLINGTON, LOHN & ROBINSON, PLLP, Defendants-Appellees. … See Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 135 S.

State Board of Equalization v. Boteler

131 F.2d 386 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 10, 1942

With this holding of the California Court in mind, it will be well to turn to the case of Boteler v. Ingels, supra, upon which the Board relies. … Johnson, supra, nor Boteler v.

Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas v. National Labor Relations Board

309 F.3d 578 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 28, 2002

We therefore must defer to the Board’s rule if (1) it is “ ‘rational and consistent with the Act,’ ” see Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. … NLRB, 482 U.S. 27, 42 , 107 S.Ct. 2225 , 96 L.Ed.2d 22 (1987)); and (2) the Board’s “ ‘explication is not inadequate, irrational or arbitrary,’ ” see id. (quoting NLRB v.

Charfauros v. Board of Elections

249 F.3d 941 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 6, 2001

In King v. Board of Elections, No. 91-1191 (N. Mar. I. Commw. Super. … in the Commonwealth. 48 The Board members argue that Bisom v.

Dorothy E. Brown and Donald Lee Brown and United States National Bank of Oregon, Etc. v. United States

427 F.2d 57 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1970

(Tucker v. Alexander (1927) 275 U.S. 228 , 48 S.Ct. 45 , 72 L.Ed. 253 ; Scharpf v. United States (D.Or.1956) 157 F.Supp. 434, 437 , aff’d per curiam (9th Cir. 1957) 250 F.2d 744 .) And it is true that Mr. … The district court’s opinion is reported as Brown v. United States (D.Ore.1968) 292 F.Supp. 527 . 2 . Section 421 was substantially revised in 1984 and new §§ 422-25 concerning stock options were enacted.

Douglas E. Brown Katherine E. Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified School District, Woodland Parents Group, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

27 F.3d 1373 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 15, 1994

XIV; Everson v. Board of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 8 , 67 S.Ct. 504, 507-08 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … See Board of Educ. of Westside Comm. Sch. v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, 250 , 110 S.Ct. 2356, 2371-72 , 110 L.Ed.2d 191 (1990) (plurality portion of opinion); Edwards v.

John Lee v. Federal Maritime Board

284 F.2d 577 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 9, 1960

This is made clear in Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. … Rule 10 (aa) of the Board’s Rules of Practice and Procedure; Federal Trade Commission v. Menzies, D.C., 145 F.Supp. 164, 171 .

Broadway Towel Supply Co. v. Brown-Meyer Co.

245 F. 659 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 1917

In Liberman’s Ex’rs v. Ruwell (C. … Cases of similar import are Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co., 99 Fed. 90 , 39 C. C. A. 426 ; Wright & Colton Wire-Cloth Co. v. Clinton Wire-Cloth Co., 67 Fed. 790 , 14 C. C. A. 646 ; Hill v. Sawyer (C.

National Labor Relations Board v. Jonas

611 F.2d 1248 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 1979

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, NLRB v. … In Nathanson v.

Peacock v. Board of Regents

776 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 11, 1985

776 F.2d 1053 Peacock v. Board of Regents 84-1663, 84-1697 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 10/11/85 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

Leitch v. National Mediation Board

628 F.2d 1356 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 10, 1980

628 F.2d 1356 Leitch v. National Mediation Board 78-2634 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 9/10/80 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. Hazen

203 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 28, 1953

Two questions are presented: first, whether the respondents’ business was sufficiently interstate to give the Board jurisdiction, and second, whether there was proof of the alleged unfair labor practices. … This issue relates to a question of fact which was for the Board and we cannot disturb its finding. Order enforced.

McGee v. Railroad Retirement Board

549 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 3, 1977

549 F.2d 807 McGee v. Railroad Retirement Board No. 76-2453 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1/3/77 1 R.R.B. AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. Daboll

216 F.2d 143 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 1954

N.L.R.B. v. Stoller, 9 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 305 . The Board declines jurisdiction when in its opinion commerce is affected only by way of a direct inflow of goods and such inflow is less than $500,000. … Radio Officers’ Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A.F.L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323 . It is ordered that a decree be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Charfauros v. Board of Elections

249 F.3d 941 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 2001

In King v. Board of Elections, No. 91-1191, 1991 WL 328471 (N. Mar. … The Board members argue that Bisom v. CNMI, No. 95-0042 (D.N. Mar. I.

Connors v. National Transportation Safety Board

844 F.3d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 4, 2017

SE-19621 v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPINION SAFETY BOARD; MICHAEL P. … CONNORS V.

Brown v. Puget Sound Electrical Apprenticeship & Training Trust

732 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1984

In Krenzer v. Ford, 429 F.Supp. 499, 502 (D.D.C.1977), the facts showed that the Administrator of the Veterans Administration would submit only veterans’ names for appointment to the Board of Veterans Appeals. … In Woody v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Smith

209 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 27, 1954

Such being the case the determination to exercise jurisdiction in the instant case was exclusively for the Board. N. L. R. B. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 9 Cir., 195 F.2d 141 . … As to this contention our review is confined to a consideration of whether or not the action of the Board was unreasonable or clearly arbitrary. N. L. R. B. v.

Brown v. Sprint United Management

136 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2005

Under Nevada law, an at-will employee has no cognizable “bad faith” discharge claim, and Brown did not carry his burden to show his discharge violated Nevada public policy. See Allum v. … See Abogados v. AT&T, Inc., 223 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir.2000). The district court did not err by declining to award Brown additional incentive compensation.

Alaska Survival v. Surface Transportation Board

704 F.3d 615 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 2012

FD-35095 v. … , and denied a petition for review of the Board’s order.