Case law

Thessolonia Smith, by Julia Brown, His Mother and Next Friend, and Julia Brown v. United States

337 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 1964

National Labor Relations Board v. Dant

195 F.2d 299 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 20, 1952

B. v. Postex Cotton Mills, 5 Cir., 181 F.2d 919 ; N. L. R. B. v. J. I. Case Co., 8 Cir., 189 F.2d 599 ;. N. L. R. B. v. Clark Shoe Co., 1 Cir., 189 F.2d 731 . … However, they had no retroactive effect and hence did not validate the charge or empower the Board to entertain it or to issue the complaint or the order. See N. L. R. B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., supra; N. L. R. B. v.

Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 6, 2026

UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WA V. BROWN 7 Steven T. … Malik v. Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting in part Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215 (1972)).

Joye v. Franchise Tax Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 2009

The other cases relied on by the Board are also unhelpful. In Schatz v. Franchise Tax Board, 81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 719 (Cal. Ct. … In Schatz v. Franchise Tax Board, 81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 719, 724 (Ct.

Perez-Arellano v. Smith

279 F.3d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 21, 2002

& Care Home, Inc. v. … Heeren v. City of Jamestown, 39 F.3d 628, 631 (6th Cir.1994) (quoting Citizens Coalition for Block Grant Compliance, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Dant

207 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1953

N.L.R.B. v. West Coast Casket Co., 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 902 . The inferences drawn by the trial examiner in this case from credible testimony are not so improbable as to impeach the Board’s findings. … It is well settled that the inferences drawn by the Board are strengthened by the fact that the explanation of the discharge offered by the respondent fails to stand under scrutiny. N.L.R.B. v. Bird Mach.

DHX, INC. v. Surface Transportation Board

501 F.3d 1080 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 30, 2007

See Fox v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Cirque Du Soleil Nevada, Inc.

255 F. App'x 117 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 1, 2007

Thus, Brown established a prima facie case of discrimination. See Aragon v. Republic Silver State Disposal Inc., 292 F.3d 654, 659-60 (9th Cir.2002). … See Stegall v.

Atchison v. Board of Equalization

795 F.2d 1442 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 31, 1986

Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization, No. CV-81-4365-SW (N.D.Cal. June 22, 1984). … State Board of Equalization, No. 810433 (S.F.Super.Ct.Cal., filed June 14, 1983); Union Tank Car Co. v. State Board of Equalization, No. 840231 (S.F.Super.Ct.Cal., filed May 16, 1985); Union Tank Car Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Radcliffe

211 F.2d 309 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 1954

N.L.R.B. v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co., 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 471, 475 . . N.L.R.B. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 9 Cir., 204 F.2d 79, 86 ; See also Mar Gong v. Brownell, 9 Cir., 209 F.2d 448 . . N.L.R.B. v. … N.L.R.B. v. A. S. Abell Co., 4 Cir., 97 F.2d 951 ; N.L.R.B. v. Laister-Kauffmann Aircraft Corp., 8 Cir., 144 F.2d 9 ; N.L.R.B. v. W. T. Grant Co., 9 Cir., 199 F.2d 711 ; N.L.R.B. v.

James Brown v. Southern California Ibew-Neca

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 7, 2009

Brown did not hold a C-10 license.  BROWN v. … The district court concluded that the Board of Trustees erred when it determined that Brown’s job as a systems spe- 15970 BROWN v.

Hess v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 2008

Hess appealed the Board’s deci- sion to the Administrative Review Board, which affirmed the 1462 HESS v. BOARD OF PAROLE Board’s decision, noting that “Dr. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2). 1464 HESS v. BOARD OF PAROLE States v. Dang, 488 F.3d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir. 2007).

National Labor Relations Board v. Reed

206 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 1953

Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin, 1937, 301 U.S. 1, 31, 32 , 57 S.Ct. 615, 621 . … The Board’s petition for enforcement of its order as modified to conform to this opinion is granted. Granted. 1 . National Labor Relations Board v.

Morales v. Merit System Protection Board

932 F.2d 800 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 6, 1991

Harp v. Dept. of Army, 791 F.2d 161 (Fed.Cir.1986). … All reasonable inferences in Morales’ favor were to be considered by the court in connection with the Board’s motion for summary judgment. Matsushita Elec. v.

Local Joint Executive Board v. NLRB

883 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 2018

V. … V.

Johnson v. Franchise Tax Board

61 F. App'x 494 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2003

The district court properly dismissed Johnson’s claim under the FDCPA because the Franchise Tax Board is not a “debt collector” as defined by the statute. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6)(C). … See Pedrina v. Chun, 97 F.3d 1296, 1300 (9th Cir.1996).

National Labor Relations Board v. Noroian

193 F.2d 172 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 1951

The above named Board has moved for a summary entry of a decree of enforcement of an order of the Board. … National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385 , 66 S.Ct. 553 , 90 L.Ed. 739 . Let decree be entered accordingly.

Beneli v. National Labor Relations Board

873 F.3d 1094 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 17, 2017

See also Saipan Hotel Corp. v. NLRB, 114 F.3d 994 , 998 (9th Cir. 1997) (same); Garfias-Rodriguez v. … As developed in Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union v.

Pacific Plywood Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Independent Particle Board Employees, Inc.

315 F.2d 671 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 1963

The Board’s decision and order are reported at 134 N.L.R.B. No. 77. The Board’s jurisdiction is based on Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. … The Board’s Trial Examiner, who observed the demeanor of the witnesses, made his findings, and the Board adopted those findings.

Cross v. Board of Supervisors

442 F.2d 362 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 23, 1971