Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.35s
Abraham v. Oregon Department of Corrections
692 F. App'x 469 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 2017
Moreover, there was no error in granting summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity to the state officials sued in their individual capacities. … Qualified immunity protects “state officials from money damages unless a plaintiff pleads facts showing (1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTyson v. Oregon Department of Corrections
483 F. App'x 347 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2012
The district court properly granted the remaining individual defendants qualified immunity at summary judgment on the excessive force claim because Tyson failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether … The district court properly granted qualified immunity at summary judgment on Tyson’s conspiracy claim because Tyson failed to allege any evidence suggesting an agreement or meeting of the minds among supposed conspirators
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJames L. Tatum v. Norman Carlson, Warden, and Lt. Mickey Ray
2 F.3d 1158 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 4, 1993
not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." … Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense, and the federal official bears the burden of proof. Harlow, 457 U.S. at 815 .
Cited 0 timesUnpublished87 F. 801 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 1898
It does not appear from the record that any right, privilege, or immunity under the constitution or laws of the United States was specially sol, up or claimed by the defendant below, or that any such right was denied them … of a federal nature unless it *810 clearly appears from the averments of the complaint or the declaration that in the progress of the trial, and preliminary to an adjudication, the right of the one or the other of the parties
Reversed on other grounds by Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter, 177 U.S. 505 (1900)Cited 25 timesPublishedUnited States v. Giovanni Ramirez
347 F.3d 792 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 24, 2003
. § 4A1.2(k)(l), “To qualify as a sentence of imprisonment, the defendant must have actually served a period of imprisonment on such sentence.” U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2 cmt. n. 2. … Code Ann. § 2967.141 (West 2003) (establishing series of violation sanction centers as restrictive control sanctions); Okla. Stat.
Cited 20 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 23, 2021
Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 (2009) (“Qualified immunity is applicable unless the official’s conduct violated a clearly established constitutional right.”); Horton v. … City of Santa Maria, 915 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir. 2019) (the inquiry as to whether a constitutional right is clearly established must be undertaken “in light of the specific context of the case, not as a broad general proposition
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMichael Foss, a Minor v. United States
623 F.2d 104 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 1980
In this case, if an incorrect standard had been used and if, indeed, Foss was negligent, then the damages to Foss’s survivors would be diminished accordingly under California’s comparative negligence law as established in … He was clearly entitled to accept this hypothesis over others urged by the F.A.A. and to resolve conflicting testimony in so doing. Neal v. United States, 562 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1977).
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Mendoza-Garcia
29 F. App'x 449 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 2, 2002
United States, 495 U.S. 575 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 , 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990), a court can examine “documentation or judicially noticeable facts that clearly establish that the conviction is a predicate conviction for enhancement … Í2] Based on our review of the record, we conclude that Mendoza-Garcia’s conviction qualified as an aggravated felony.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDiana Steinmetz v. City of Camas
390 F. App'x 655 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 2010
As they are entitled to qualified immunity, we affirm. … the right was clearly established in light of the specific context of the case.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedExchange Nat. Bank of Spokane v. Meikle
61 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 1932
Meikle, ap-pellee herein, was elected trustee and duly qualified. On August 5, 1929, a suit was instituted against the Exchange National Bank of Spokane and James A. … That being so, the total sum of $506,445.02 of the “Fred Herrick Advance Account” on the books of the Fred Herrick Lumber Company was a liability on October 9, 1928, and it clearly follows that the Fred Herrick Lumber Company
Cited 15 timesPublished104 F.3d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 1996
The district court held that Muzquiz was entitled to qualified immunity on this claim. 7 The qualified immunity test consists of three prongs: 1) the identification of a specific right allegedly violated; 2) whether the conduct … Accordingly, because Muzquiz's acts did not violate clearly established law, she was entitled to qualified immunity and the district court's grant of summary judgment on this issue was proper.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJeanne P. Herman v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union No. 971
60 F.3d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 21, 1995
The employer and the union then waived the contractually-established twenty-four-hour period for selecting the neutral chairperson or requesting a list of qualified arbitrators. … Herman’s claim for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is clearly preempted.
Cited 60 timesPublished186 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1951
The case presents the same two main issues present in the other two cases: (1) qualify of the hops and (2) the proper measure of damages. … While we express no opinion on what view of this conflicting evidence we might take we cannot say that the finding of the trial court is clearly erroneous.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJacquelyn McGee v. S-L Snacks National, LLC
982 F.3d 700 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 2020
“[A]t the pleading stage, the plaintiff must ‘clearly . . . allege facts demonstrating’ each element.” Id. at 1547 (alteration in original) (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 518). … Once again, McGee relies on a viable legal theory to establish standing for her non-UCL claims.
Cited 46 timesPublished872 F.2d 919 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 18, 1989
Such a benefit, though not a contractual right of employment, may qualify as a “privileg[e]” of employment under Title VII. … Burns, 427 U.S. 347 , 96 S.Ct. 2673 , 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976), as clearly protecting political appointees from discrimination on the basis of race. Adams, 695 F.2d at 107 .
Cited 54 timesPublishedNeedbasedapps, LLC v. Robbins Research International, Inc.
655 F. App'x 541 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 5, 2016
like judicial or qualified immunity. … An order denying immunity from suit is immediately appealable because such immunity is “effectively lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCity of San Jose v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
776 F.3d 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 15, 2015
And Federal Baseball and Toolson clearly extend the baseball exemption to the entire “business of providing public baseball games for profit between clubs of professional baseball players.” … Nor does it mean that MLB or its franchises are immune from antitrust suit.
Cited 15 timesPublished66 F. App'x 86 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2003
Smith, 203 F.3d *89 1122,1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (stating that mere negligence does not establish deliberate indifference to medical needs). … Even assuming arguendo that Jones violated Cardenas’ rights, qualified immunity protects Jones from suit. See Butler v. Elle, 281 F.3d 1014, 1021 (9th Cir.2002).
Cited 0 timesPublished650 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 6, 1981
appeals explained that the causal relation between the lawsuit and the relief received “must be more than simple knowledge that litigation may occur,” and that the chronology of events, while a “factor to consider” was “clearly … Id. at 1163 . 17 It is clear, then, that the courts have required consistently that plaintiffs seeking to qualify as “prevailing parties” establish some sort of clear, causal relationship between the litigation brought and
Cited 94 timesPublished231 F.2d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 30, 1956
The truth of whatever charges were made must have been established by defendants for them to prevail on the plea of truth. Testimony as to this feature was submitted by both sides. … The tendered evidence as to procedure in a preliminary hearing, when the prosecuting attorney and complaining witness fail to appear, was clearly immaterial under the circumstances of the case.
Cited 20 timesPublished
Ask Donna