Case law

United States v. Indian Boy X

565 F.2d 585 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1977

Blood of appellant’s type was found on Miss Brown’s blouse and shawl. One of Miss Brown’s hairs, crushed as with a blunt instrument, was found on appellant’s jacket. … Appellant’s mother testified that she was a cousin of Miss Brown and that her children were very close to Miss Brown. (Tr. 667). Miss Brown’s hospital record was admitted which indicated that she was an Indian.

Kraft v. Jacka

872 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 12, 1989

Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 650 F.2d 1093, 1101 (9th Cir.1981) (citing Board of Regents v. … Learned v.

Lorcan Kilroy v. Lausd Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 2020

v. … See Mathews v.

The Queen

186 F. 725 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 21, 1910

In Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Philadelphia, 12 How. 299, 319 , 13 L. … In Bigley v. New York P. R. S. S. Co. (D.

Hun Chak Sun, Also Known as Jack Sun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

415 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 27, 1969

Whether to grant reopening rests within the sound discretion of the Board. Greene v. I & NS, 313 F.2d 148 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 828 , 83 S.Ct. 1869 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963). … Cubillos-Gonzalez v. I & NS, 352 F.2d 782 (9th Cir. 1965); Cabrera v. I & NS, 415 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir. Aug. 19, 1969).

Zemke v. Larsen

434 F.2d 1281 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 1970

In making their recommendations, neither the commanding officer nor the Army Board had the benefit of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Welsh v. … We recognize that these contentions may raise substantial issues, see Hand v. Laird, 3 SSLR 3298 (N.D.Cal.1970); Shirer v. Hackel, 3 SSLR 3211 (N.D.Cal.1970); Rabbito v. Larson, 3 SSLR 3211 (N.D.Cal.1970); Gresham v.

Milne Employees Association v. Sun Carriers, Inc.

960 F.2d 1401 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1992

Bloom v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 734 F.Supp. 1553, 1559 (C.D.Cal.1990) (section 301 can preempt state law claim against defendants who did not sign CBA), aff'd, 933 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir.1991); Brown v. … Id. at 208 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 887 (quoting Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 111 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901, 906 (1976)).

Carpenters' Local Union No. 1478 v. Neal Stevens, Neal Stevens v. Carpenters' Local Union No. 1478 Southern California Conference of Carpenters

743 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 4, 1984

Co. v. … v.

Doernbecher Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

95 F.2d 296 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 9, 1938

Burnet v. Leininger, 285 U.S. 136 , 52 S.Ct. 345 , 76 L.Ed. 665 ; Helvering v. Rankin, 295 U.S. 123 , 55 S.Ct. 732 , 79 L.Ed. 1343 ; General Utilities & Operating Co. v. … S. v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co., 89 F.2d 606, 609 ; by this court, speaking through Judge Haney, in Buck v. Com’r, 83 F.2d 786 ; and by Justice Cardozo, speaking for the Supreme Court, in Dayton Power & Lt. Co. v.

Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose

841 F.2d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 1988

Conley v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) (Parker ).

WESTERN MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

783 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1986

Center, Inc. v. … The Board “has employed its expertise and judgment in a way that the law has contemplated.” Id., cited in Johnson Oyster Co. v. Baldridge, 704 F.2d 1060, 1063 (9th Cir.1983). V.

M.W. Kellogg Constructors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. M.W. Kellogg Constructors, Inc., National Labor Relations Board v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 250, Afl-Cio

806 F.2d 1435 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 30, 1986

KELLOGG CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. M.W. KELLOGG CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Respondent. … See Ward v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Phillip Davisson, William Davisson, Oscar Scherrer and Warner Scherrer, D/B/A Scherrer and Davisson Logging Company

221 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 25, 1955

This matter is before us on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order issued against respondents. … The findings of the Board are substantially supported upon the record considered as a whole. A decree enforcing the order will accordingly be entered.

Delano Farms Company v. California Table Grape Commiss

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 2009

See Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 463(1980). … Congress created Amtrak as a corporation and gave the President the power to appoint the majority of Amtrak’s board members. See id. at 384-85.  DELANO FARMS v.

Kevin Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University, Frank Kush, William Maskill, Fred L. Miller, Kevin Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University, Frank Kush, William Maskill, Fred L. Miller, and Gary Horton

660 F.2d 1345 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1981

660 F.2d 1345 Kevin RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, Arizona State University, Frank Kush, William Maskill, Fred L. Miller, Defendants-Appellees. Kevin RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The Arizona Board of Regents is treated as the State of Arizona under Arizona law. See Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona York Refrigeration Co., 115 Ariz. 338 , 565 P.2d 518 (1977). Its funds are state funds.

Glen Woodson Palmer, Jr. v. United States

401 F.2d 226 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 1968

On January 5, 1968, for the first time he submitted a claim of conscientious objection to his local draft board. No action was taken by the board. … United States v. Bonga, 201 F.Supp. 908 (E.D.Mich. 1962); United States v. Monroe, 150 F.Supp. 785 (S.D.Cal.1957); approved in Boyd v. United States, 269 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1959). Contra, United States v.

Steven Michael Oshatz v. United States

404 F.2d 9 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 23, 1968

See Simmons v. United States, supra; Chernekoff v. United States, 219 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1955). … See, e. g., Davis v. United States, 374 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1967); United States v. Gearey, 368 F.2d 144 (2d Cir. 1966); United States v. Al-Majied Muhammad, 364 F.2d 223 (4th Cir. 1966); United States v.

The Sea Ranch Association v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commissions

537 F.2d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 10, 1976

OPINION Before BARNES, BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. … See Section 27001 of the Act; Board of Regents v. New Left Education Project, 404 U.S. 541, 542 , 92 S.Ct. 652 , 30 L.Ed.2d 697 (1972). Compare Hjelle v. Brooks, 377 F.Supp. 430, 435 (D.Alaska 1974).

Jackie Lee Hinkle v. United States

216 F.2d 8 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 24, 1954

This question has been considered in Taffs v. United States, 8 Cir., 208 F.2d 329 ; United States v. Hartman, 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 366 , and Annett v. United States, 10 Cir., 205 F.2d 689 . … As the appellant’s final classification was that given him by the appeal board, the question here arises upon the validity of that board’s action; the preceding classification is not in issue. United States v.

Lewis v. Anderson

615 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 1979

In Auerbach v. … See Ross v.