Case law

Donald Singer v. The Flying Tiger Line Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, International

652 F.2d 1349 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 13, 1981

In Chevron Oil Co. v. … Courts are also foreclosed from examining the merits of a System Board decision so long as the subject matter is within the Board’s jurisdiction. Gunther v.

Adela Hernandez-Ortiz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

777 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1985

When the Board denies any motion as a matter of discretion, it must specify clearly the factors it has considered. See Patel v. INS, 741 F.2d 1134, 1137 (9th Cir.1984); De La Luz v. … V. CONCLUSION The Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion when it denied Hernandez-Ortiz’s motion to reopen.

Adams House Health Care v. Heckler

817 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 18, 1987

Vance v. Hegstrom, 793 F.2d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.1986). In other words, we review the Board’s refusals to accept jurisdiction under the same standard as did the district court. … See University of Cincinnati v. Sec’y of Health and Human Services, 809 F.2d 307 (6th Cir.1987); North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Bowen, 808 F.2d 1405 (11th Cir.1987); Baptist Hospital East v.

United States v. Coates

692 F.2d 629 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 18, 1982

Before BROWNING, PREGERSON and POOLE, Circuit Judges. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1722 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) 6 This interpretation is supported by U.S. v.

Musibau Hassan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

927 F.2d 465 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 1991

Although the Board has “authority to construe ‘extreme hardship’ narrowly,” INS v. … Mattis v. INS, 774 F.2d 965, 968 (9th Cir.1985); see also Vargas v.

Hee Yung Ahn and Kyung Hee Ahn v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

651 F.2d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 30, 1981

In INS v. … And in Perez v. INS, 643 F.2d 640 (9th Cir. 1981), the court reversed the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen.

Johansen v. Chauffeurs, Salesmen & Helpers Local 572

535 F.2d 1204 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1976

The Board’s motion to dismiss the appeal for mootness is granted. … The Board’s motion for an order remanding the matter to the district court with directions to vacate its order denying the Board’s petition for Section 10(j) injunctive relief and to dismiss the petition for mootness is likewise

Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Plaintiffs v. The Board of Oil and Gas Conservation of the State of Montana

792 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 1986

See Buckley v. … See also Nader v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 657 F.2d 453, 456 (D.C.Cir. 1981) (where claim is that adoption of rule violated statutory directives, non-reviewability doctrine was “simply inapplicable”); Matzke v.

William Chernekoff, Jr. v. United States

219 F.2d 721 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 25, 1955

United States v. … United States, 9 Cir., 218 F.2d 375 ; Kalpakoff v. United States, 9 Cir., 217 F.2d 748 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 1944, 321 U.S. 542, 558 , 64 S.Ct. 737 , 88 L.Ed. 917 ; Williams v.

Christopher Garnier v. Michelle O'connor-Ratcliff

41 F.4th 1158 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 27, 2022

In other posts, O’Connor-Ratcliff and Zane reported on PUSD Board-related business. For instance, on several occasions, O’Connor-Ratcliff posted  GARNIER V. … “[N]o one fact can function as a necessary condition across the board.” Rawson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen, Helpers And Automotive Employees Of Contra Costa County, Local No. 315

20 F.3d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1994

(quoting Turcios v. INS, 821 F.2d 1396, 1398 (9th Cir.1987)). We defer to the Board's interpretation of the National Labor Relations Act " 'if it is reasonably defensible.' " N.L.R.B. v. … In light of the deference we accord decisions of the Board, we will enforce the Board's order in this case. See N.L.R.B. v. O'Neill, 965 F.2d at 1526 ; N.L.R.B. v. United Union of Roofers, Local 81, 915 F.2d at 510 .

Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

257 F.3d 1038 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 2001

Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000). … Mejia Paiz v. INS, 111 F.3d 720, 723-24 (9th Cir.1997).

George E. Vanelli, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Reynolds School District No. 7, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

667 F.2d 773 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 1982

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Stretten v. Wadsworth Veterans Hosp., 537 F.2d 361, 367 (9th Cir. 1976); see Peacock v. Board of Regents, 510 F.2d 1324, 1328 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1049 , 95 S.Ct. 2668 , 45 L.Ed.2d 701 (1975).

Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. Ewing

174 F.2d 676 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1949

Note that there is no lay jury to be protected from improper influence. 20 See Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197, 229-230 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L. … Ct. 391 , 77 L.Ed. 819 ; Ballston-Still-water Knitting Co. ,v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 1938, 98 E.2d 758, 760; N. L. R. B. v.

NATIONAL MEAT ASS'N v. Harris

680 F.3d 1193 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2012

BROWN NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION,  Plaintiff-Appellee, and AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. KAMALA D. … BROWN 6565 vacate our prior opinion in National Meat Ass’n v. Brown, 599 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2010), and affirm the judgment of the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R. App.

Jennifer Cruz v. the City of Anaheim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 2014

We therefore affirm summary judgment in favor of Officer Brown.  CRUZ V. … Brown shall recover his costs against appellants.

International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union v. Paul R. Kuntz and John G. Cvitkovic, Individually and as Members of a Class, Pacific Maritime Association v. Paul R. Kuntz and John G. Cvitkovic, Individually and as Members of a Class

334 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 1964

Dinwiddie v. Brown, 230 F.2d 465, 468 (5th Cir. 1956); Lane Bryant, Inc. v. Maternity Lane, Ltd., 173 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1949). … Kelly Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corporations, 172 F.2d 865, 866 (1st Cir. 1949); Dinwiddie v. Brown, supra. It was the procedural vehicle employed in Hardcastle v.

Willard v. City of Los Angeles

803 F.2d 526 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 28, 1986

In its -recent opinion in Evans v. … Brown v.

Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California Corporation

798 F.2d 1279 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 1986

University of Tennessee v. Elliott, — U.S.—, 106 S.Ct. 3220, 3224 , 92 L.Ed.2d 635 (1986); Buckhalter v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc., 768 F.2d 842, 849 (7th Cir.1985); Holley v. … See Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 9 Cal.3d 494, 500-501 , 509 P.2d 945, 949 , 108 Cal.Rptr. 1, 5 , (1973).

Albert Stain v. United States

235 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 15, 1956

La Charity v. … Our instant case is distinguishable from Olvera v.