The opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official
capacity as Attorney General of No. 09-15483
California; EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,
in his official capacity as D.C. No.
1:08-cv-01963-
Governor of California; STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, LJO-DLB
Defendants-Appellants,
and
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE
UNITED STATES; FARM SANCTUARY,
INC.; HUMANE FARMING
ASSOCIATION; ANIMAL LEGAL
DEFENSE FUND,
Defendant-Intervenors.
6563
6564 NATIONAL MEAT ASS’N v. BROWN
NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official
capacity as Attorney General of No. 09-15486
California; EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,
D.C. No.
in his official capacity as
Governor of California; STATE OF 1:08-cv-01963-
CALIFORNIA, LJO-DLB
Defendants, ORDER
and
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE
UNITED STATES; FARM SANCTUARY,
INC.; HUMANE FARMING
ASSOCIATION; ANIMAL LEGAL
DEFENSE FUND,
Defendants-Intervenors-
Appellants.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed June 8, 2012
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt and
Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in
National Meat Ass’n v. Harris, 132 S. Ct. 965 (2012), we
NATIONAL MEAT ASS’N v. BROWN 6565
vacate our prior opinion in National Meat Ass’n v. Brown,
599 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2010), and affirm the judgment of the
district court.
The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R. App. P.
41(b).
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2012 Thomson Reuters.