Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.36s
United States v. Bryson Jose Roberto A. Miguel
425 F.3d 1237 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 19, 2005
Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … See Brown, 432 U.S. at 168-69 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 .
Cited 46 timesPublishedProject 80's, Inc. And David John Fitzen v. City of Pocatello and the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho
876 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 25, 1989
See Valentine v. Chrestensen, 316 U.S. 52 , 62 S.Ct. 920 , 86 L.Ed. 1262 (1942). Subsequently, in Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See Frisby v. Schultz, — U.S. -, -, 108 S.Ct. 2495, 2502 , 101 L.Ed. 2d 420 (1988); Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 471 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2295 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980).
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States v. Clay Brown, Jr.
892 F.2d 1047 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 1989
United States v. … See 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (d) (Supp.1989); United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMotel Corporation v. Motel Corporation
450 F.2d 499 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 21, 1971
Appellants Caruso and CEI, together with two intervenors, Day and Brown Insurance Company and Mr. … United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished794 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1986
See United Steelworkers of America v. NLRB, 692 F.2d 1052 (7th Cir.1982) (denying enforcement of Board order awarding backpay against union for breach of duty because grievance not shown to have merit); NLRB v. … However, federal interests such as the parties’ attempt to resolve the case through the Board, see Retail Clerks Union Local 648 v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedAlbert v. Frisby v. General Stanley Larsen
486 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 1973
Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., Janet Aitken, John F. Cooney, Jr., F. Steele Langford, Frederic F. Tilton, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Richard L. … United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of Leland Stanford University v. Chungyan Chan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 13, 2026
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE No. 23-16077 LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, D.C. … See Bock v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities Litigation
11 F.3d 843 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 25, 1994
Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and KELLY, * Circuit Judges. The memorandum disposition filed September 15, 1993, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Kelly. … See O'Brien v.
Vacated by In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities Litigation, 42 F.3d 1541 (1994)Cited 22 timesPublishedRodney Green, Sr. v. Mercy Housing, Inc.
991 F.3d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 2021
Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1)). … See Brown, 246 F.3d at 1190.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPanatronic Usa, a California General Partnership Lemar Textile Co. v. At&t Corporation
287 F.3d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 22, 2002
Brown v. MCI World-Com Network Services Inc., 277 F.3d 1166 , 1170 (9th Cir.2002). … See In The Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 12 F.C.C.R. 8776, 1997 WL 236383 § 829 (May 8, 1997); Evanns v.
Cited 74 timesPublishedSino Clean Energy, Inc. v. Robert Seiden
901 F.3d 1139 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 27, 2018
Corp. v. Coleman (In re Coleman), 560 F.3d 1000, 1003 (9th Cir. 2009). … Price v. Gurney, 324 U.S. 100, 106–07 (1945); see also Keenihan v.
Cited 23 timesPublished403 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 1968
The broad scope of the Board’s functioning in section 10 (k) proceedings is outlined in N.L.R.B. v. … N.L.R.B. v. C. & C. Plywood Corp., 385 U.S. 421, 427, 428 , 87 S.Ct. 559 , 17 L.Ed.2d 486 , makes it clear, however, that the Board has such authority. See also, N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBennie Brown v. Mike Stoffel Joseph Malcolm
141 F.3d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 2, 1998
Butz v. Economu, 438 U.S. 478, 508-17 , 98 S.Ct. 2894 , 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978). Therefore, while members of a parole board are entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity, Sellars v. … Although the record does not indicate that he argued before the board, his preparation and presentation of evidence against Brown to the parole board evidences a prosecutorial function.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished759 F.2d 1411 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 1985
West v. Brown, 558 F.2d at 761 . 23 Lindenau v. … See Lindenau v. Alexander, supra; West v. Brown, supra; Henson v. Alexander, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrothers Market LLC No. 2 v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 2026
OPINION v. … Without other evidence supporting Brown’s affidavit, Plaintiffs cannot establish a genuine issue of material fact. See FTC v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCitizens For A Better Environment-California v. Union Oil Company Of California
83 F.3d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 16, 1996
Henderson, District Judge, Presiding. 6 Before: BROWNING and JOHN T. … Chevron U.S.A. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAtchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Seamas
201 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 16, 1952
Co., 149 Iowa 41 , 127 N.W. 1093 ; Rush v. Brown, 153 Kan. 59 , 109 P.2d 84 ; Illinois , Steel Co. v. Schymanowski, 162 Ill. 447 , 44 N.E. 876 ; Usry v. Augusta Southern R. … Co. v. Brown, 195 Ark. 1060 , 115 S. W.2d 1083 ; Oakes v. Mohon, 208, Miss. 478, 44 So.2d 551 ; 4 Labatt, Master and Servant, 3933-3934 ; 56 C.J.S. Master and Servant, § 464. . Hardy v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.
Cited 6 timesPublished183 F.3d 970 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 25, 1999
Before: BROWNING and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, 1 District Judge. … V.
Abrogated on other grounds by South Ferry LP, No. 2 v. Killinger, 542 F.3d 776 (2008)Cited 805 timesPublished116 F.3d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 10, 1997
TEEHEE, Plaintff-Appellant, v. … In Schnidria v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBennie L. West v. Armando Gonzalez
37 F.3d 1508 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1994
In the context of prison disciplinary proceedings, the requirements of due process are satisfied if there is "some evidence" to support the findings of the prison disciplinary board. Bostic v. … The relevant inquiry is " 'whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.' " Id. at 1270 (quoting Superintendent v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna