Case law

United States v. Brown

518 F. App'x 553 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2013

Pursuant to Anders v. … We have provided Brown the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

United States v. Rita Darlene Brown

602 F.2d 909 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 1979

Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975).” (Brown v. Ohio (1977) 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 .) … Our issue is resolved by United States v. Batchelder (1979)- U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2198 , 60 L.Ed.2d 755 .

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Brown

651 F.2d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 1980

See Simon v. … See Shell Oil Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc.

233 F.3d 1176 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 22, 2000

, Petitioner-Intervenor, v. … We grant summary enforcement of the Board's order with respect to those findings. See Gardner Mech. Serv., Inc. v.

United States v. Brown

31 F. App'x 408 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 2002

We decline to address this contention, because we find that Brown waived the specific objections he now raises on appeal. See United States v. … Brown also challenges the constitutionality of § 841(a) in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v.

Donyel v. Brown v. Ernie Roe, Warden

279 F.3d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 2002

Although Brown’s conviction became final prior to the passage of AEDPA, the statute’s time limits apply because Brown filed his petition after AEDPA’s effective date. See Calderon v. United States Dist. … .”); Wimmer v.

United States v. Brown

32 F. App'x 264 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 2002

See United States v. … Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary denial of Brown’s request for a downward departure. See id. DISMISSED.

Shamsher Singh v. Merrick Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 12, 2023

We must defer to the Board’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), as well as, in certain cases, to its interpretation of the statute, see Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984); Route v. … Perhaps the most helpful case for the Board is Hoxha v.

Robert Allen Brown v. United States

409 F.2d 1354 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 1969

“A registrant is not entitled to have a local board reopen his classification where the conscientious objector form is not filed until after the registrant has refused to submit to induction. *1355 Palmer v. … Appellant mistakenly relies on our decision in Boyd v. United States, 269 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1959).

Harris v. Board of Supervisors

366 F.3d 754 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 2004

And in Tail-feather v. … Defendants, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DHS), and Thomas Garthwaite, Director of DHS, are referred to herein as the "County." . Rodde v.

Brown v. Attorney General

291 F. App'x 15 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 2008

Stillman v. LaMarque, 319 F.3d 1199, 1202 (9th Cir.2003). … See Dictado v. Ducharme, 244 F.3d 724, 727-28 (9th Cir. 2001). In 2005, the Supreme Court held in Pace v.

Rene Lopez Rodriguez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

683 F.3d 1164 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 27, 2012

[1] BIA regulations prohibit the Board from “engag[ing] in de novo review of findings of fact determined by an [IJ].” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(i); see also Brezilien v. … v.

Alaska Airlines v. Judy Schurke

898 F.3d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 2018

a constitutional violation or [an] egregious violation of the RLA” that would allow for judicial review of the Board’s decision). 38 ALASKA AIRLINES V. … (quoting Brown v. Hotel Emps., 468 U.S. 491, 501 (1984))). The majority asserts that Livadas illuminates a distinction between ordinary conflict preemption and § 301 preemption. Maj. Op. at 25–28.

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain

400 F.3d 659 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 2005

THEIS RESEARCH v. BROWN & BAIN 1963 The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. … There is no dispute as to diversity of  THEIS RESEARCH v. BROWN & BAIN 1971 the parties.

Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.

960 F.2d 1465 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1992

Anderson v. … See Wabol v. Villacrusis, 908 F.2d 411 , 424 n. 22 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Bergmann, 836 F.2d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.1988).

United States v. Brown

4 F. App'x 420 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 2001

See United States v. Lothian, 976 F.2d 1257, 1267 (9th Cir.1992). … United States v. Ortega, 203 F.3d 675, 684 (9th Cir.2000). Brown argues that the district court was required to instruct the jury that Brown must have specifically intended to break the law.

Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

63 F.2d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 6, 1933

Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 43 F.(2d) 78 , 76 A. L. R. 1063; Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 , 50 S. Ct. 202 , 74 L. Ed. 538 ; Thomas Cronin Co. v. Lewellyn (D. … C.) 9 F.(2d) 974 ; Consolidated Tea Co. v. Bowers (D. C.) 19 F.(2d) 382 ; Highland Milk Condensing Co. v. Phillips (C. C. A.) 34 F.(2d) 777 ; Earle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C.

Marciano Plata v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 2014

Brown v. Plata, 131 S. Ct. 1910, 1922 (2011). … H.R. 18 PLATA V. BROWN Rep.

Milner v. U.S. Dept of Navy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 2009

See Morley v. … The court held that requir- ing the NLRB to disclose its litigation strategies would “com- promis[e] the Board’s ability to defend itself in EAJA actions.” 964 F.2d at 1208. In PHE, Inc. v.

United States v. Kerry Lynn Brown

873 F.2d 1265 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 1989

See also United States v. … See United States v.