Opinion

United States v. Brown

  • 32 F. App'x 264
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Feb 22, 2002
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.7%

The opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Cutrenia Monea Brown appeals her 24-month sentence following a guilty plea conviction for making false, fictitious or fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287 . We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Brown contends that the district court erroneously concluded it lacked the discretion to depart downward on the combined grounds of her post-offense rehabilitation, her extraordinary family circumstances, and her cooperation with the government. Neither party disputed the court’s authority to depart, rather the issue presented to the district court was whether the facts in this case warranted a downward depar *265 ture; the court simply declined to exercise its discretion based on those facts. See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.2000) (“Although the district court did not specifically address its authority to depart downward ... it is clear from the record that its refusal to depart downward was not based on a belief that it lacked the authority to depart downward ... but rather, was an exercise of its discretion.”). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary denial of Brown’s request for a downward departure. See id.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.