Case law

United States v. Ralph Brown, Iii

407 F. App'x 245 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 5, 2011

No. 1:09-cr-00098-RFC v. MEMORANDUM * RALPH DELBERT BROWN, III, Defendant - Appellant. … See United States v. Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 952 (9th Cir. 2008). Brown also challenges several conditions of his supervised release.

Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books Usa, Inc., a Corporation Dove Audio, Inc., a Corporation

109 F.3d 1394 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 1997

See Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1472 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 869 , 113 S.Ct. 198 , 121 L.Ed.2d 141 (1992). First, Seuss is the owner of the Dr. … Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board of Educ., 868 F.2d 1085 , 1088 (9th Cir. 1989) (internal citations omitted). 2 .

Hayes Spray Gun Company, a Corporation, Stanley A. Hayes and E. A. Patterson v. E. C. Brown Company, a Corporation, E. C. Brown Company, a Corporation v. Hayes Spray Gun Company, a Corporation, Stanley A. Hayes and E. A. Patterson

291 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 1961

Patterson, Appellants, v. E. C. BROWN COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee. E. C. BROWN COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. HAYES SPRAY GUN COMPANY, a Corporation, Stanley A. Hayes and E. A. Patterson, Appellees. … Brown Co. Before BARNES, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

United States v. Mark Anthony Brown

962 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 1992

See, e.g., Gregorian v. Izvestia, 871 F.2d 1515, 1526 (9th Cir.1989). 3 * This case arises from Brown's behavior at two banks. He did not take anything of value from either bank. … Penal Code 1 or United States v.

Southcentral Foundation v. Anthc

983 F.3d 411 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 2020

ANTHC’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) held its first meeting in January 1998 and concurrently adopted its original bylaws (the “Bylaws”).  SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION V. ANTHC 7 II. … of the Board.

Wiltsie v. California Department of Corrections

406 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 31, 1968

With regard to the allegations pertaining to the beating, this case is indistinguishable from Brown v. Brown, 9 Cir., 368 F.2d 992 . … The court, in Brown , stated that it reached this conclusion notwithstanding the fact that such allegations tax a reader’s credibility. Brown was cited with approval in Dodd v.

Clifford Tindall v. First Solar Inc.

892 F.3d 1043 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2018

TINDALL V. … Delaware law appears clear that the Aronson test does not apply to all actions, but to board business decisions. In Rales v.

Tyrell Erlebach v. Payette County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 2023

No. 1:18-cv-00173-MDH v. … Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We vacate and remand.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brotherhood Of Teamsters And Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70

470 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 19, 1973

P 13,239 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … See NLRB v. Jeffries Banknote Co., 281 F.2d 893 (CA 9, 1960); NLRB v. Hart, 453 F.2d 215 (CA 9, 1971). 3 We have reviewed the record and find substantial support therein to support the Board's factual determinations.

United States v. Derrick H. Brown

953 F.2d 1388 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 3, 1992

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick H. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50286. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 28, 1992. * Decided Feb. 3, 1992. … Doganiere v.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl E. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant

84 F.3d 1154 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 1996

United States v. … In United States v.

Rookard v. Mexicoach

680 F.2d 1257 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 28, 1982

In Tradewind the tour passengers would re-board the tour-bus after visiting a given site. … In Ostrander v.

Pritam Taggar v. Eric Holder, Jr.

736 F.3d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 2013

The Board held that the IJ had properly deemed Taggar’s applications abandoned and waived. Further, the Board held that Taggar was not eligible  TAGGAR V. … Hassan v. Gonzales, 403 F.3d 429, 436 (6th Cir. 2005). We review the Board’s denial of motions to remand for abuse of discretion. Vargas-Hernandez, 497 F.3d at 923. 6 TAGGAR V.

The Boeing Company v. The National Labor Relations Board, and Local 286-W, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

581 F.2d 793 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 1978

Paper Products v. … See N L Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 536 F.2d 786, 789 (8th Cir. 1976); Leeds & Northrup Co. v. N.L.R.B., 391 F.2d 874, 877 (3d Cir. 1968); Robertshaw Controls Co. v.

California Hospital Association v. Henning

770 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 6, 1985

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, ALARCON, Circuit Judge, and SOLOMON, District Judge * . JAMES R. … Such a plan was involved in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 679 F.2d 1307, 1308-09 (9th Cir.1982), rev'd on other grounds, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

Maas & Feduska, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Local No. 12, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

632 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 31, 1979

This is an area in which we “recognize *719 without hesitation the primary function and responsibility of the Board . . . . Labor Board v. Insurance Agents, 361 U.S. 477, 499 , 80 S.Ct. 419 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960).” … The Board relies primarily on the following cases in support of this proposition: Teamsters Union v.

Salveson v. Western States Bankcard Ass'n

731 F.2d 1423 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 1, 1984

Moitie and Brown then appealed to this court as the other plaintiffs had already done. While the seven cases were pending appeal the Supreme Court on June 11, 1979, decided in Reiter v. … We reversed and remanded Moitie II and Brown II to the district court. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, disagreed, and reversed. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v.

Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa

35 F.3d 1355 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 9, 1994

See Shaw v. … Co. v.

Reid v. Engen

765 F.2d 1457 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 1985

See also Board of Public Instruction v. Finch, 414 F.2d 1068, 1073 (5th Cir.1979) (discussing possible factors for defining exceptional circumstances). … See generally Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 569-70 & n. 7, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 2705 & n. 7, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Westlands Water District San Benito County Water District San Luis Water District Panoche Water District v. Natural Resources Defense Council United Anglers of California Save San Francisco Bay Association California Waterfowl Association Sierra Club Bay Institute of San Francisco Environmental Defense Fund, Intervenors v. United States Department of Interior United States Department of Reclamation United States Fish and Wildlife Service Bruce Babbitt, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the Interior United States Department of Commerce the National Marine Fisheries Service and Ronald Brown, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Commerce, Westlands Water District San Benito County Water District San Luis Water District Panoche Water District v. United States Department of Interior United States Department of Reclamation United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bruce Babbitt, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the Interior United States Department of Commerce the National Marine Fisheries Service and Ronald Brown, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Commerce, and Natural Resources Defense Council United Anglers of California Save San Francisco Bay Association California Waterfowl Association Sierra Club Bay Institute of San Francisco Environmental Defense Fund, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Westlands Water District San Benito County Water District v. United States Department of Interior United States Department of Reclamation United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Grassland Water District and Grassland Resource Conservation District, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants

43 F.3d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 1994

See State of Cal. v. Watt, 683 F.2d 1253, 1269 (9th Cir.1982) (affirming district court decision that letter by Governor Brown and response by Secretary Watt satisfied the consultation requirements of 43 U.S.C. … Inst. v.