Case law

Cooke v. Solis

606 F.3d 1206 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 4, 2010

The Board also reviewed  COOKE v. … Doody v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 112, Afl-Cio, and Fischbach/lord Electric Company

827 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 1987

Our standard of review requires us to enforce the Board’s order if the Board correctly applied the law and its findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record viewed as a whole. Carpenters Union Local 25 v. … Actions before the Board are not subject to technical pleading requirements that govern private lawsuits. National Maritime Union of America v. N.L.R.B., 683 F.2d 305, 307-08 (9th Cir.1982).

Kevin Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University, and Gary Horton, an Individual and Frank Kush, an Individual, Defendants

859 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 14, 1988

A detailed narration of the facts underlying Rutledge’s claims appears in Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1981) (“Rutledge I”) and Rutledge v. … Arizona Board of Regents, 147 Ariz. 534 , 711 P.2d 1207 (Ct.App.1985) (“Rutledge II”).

Joyce Lewis v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

281 F.3d 1081 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 2002

BROWNING. WALLACE, Circuit Judge. … To Judge Browning, our approach is contrary to Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562 (9th Cir.1995) and Corbin v.

In Re Sunset Bay Associates, a California Joint Venture, Debtor. Richard J. Plastino, Janice Gudde Plastino Doris L. Brown v. Eureka Federal Savings and Loan Association, and Allan Jamieson, Richard J. Plastino Janice Gudde Plastino Doris L. Brown v. Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Association

944 F.2d 1503 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 24, 1991

Hoptowit v. … Youst v.

Robert J. Brown v. United States

993 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 6, 1993

We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal of Brown's action for failure to state a claim. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. … See Wilcox v.

Cornelious Lockhart v. United States

420 F.2d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 1970

BROWNING, Circuit Judge, with whom HAMLEY, Circuit Judge, joins (dissenting). Defendant was classified I-A by his local Selective Service board and ordered to report for induction. … Judicial review of the local board’s classification order is confined to the administrative record; no additional evidence may be received. Cox v.

Veterans for Common Sense v. Shinseki

663 F.3d 1033 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 2011

And in Cleveland Board of Education v. … Clearly v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 305, 308 (1995) (emphasis added); see also Dacoran v. Brown, 4 Vet.

Dallin Fort v. State of Washington

41 F.4th 1141 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 26, 2022

FORT V. … Kwan v.

Lazaro Fernandez v. United States

321 F.2d 283 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1963

In Contreras v. … Appellants rely on Contreras v.

United States v. Richard Daniel Alsop

479 F.2d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 14, 1973

See United States v. Brown, 412 F.2d 381, 383-384 (8th Cir. 1969). … See United States v. Epps, 438 F.2d 1192, 1193 (4th Cir. 1971) ; United States v. Brown, supra, 412 F.2d at 383-384 ; United States v. Baker, 129 F.Supp. 684, 686-687 (S.D.Cal.1955). See also United States v.

Jose Euceda Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

738 F.3d 1099 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 24, 2013

HERNANDEZ V. … . § 1229a(c)(7), does nothing to diminish the Board’s jurisdiction or authorize the Board to diminish its own jurisdiction. See Union Pac. R.R. v. Bhd. of Locomotive 8 HERNANDEZ V.

Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

299 F. 705 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 30, 1924

Co. v. … Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 165 Fed. 283 , 91 C. C. A. 251 ; In re McCrum, 214 Fed. 207 , 130 C. C. A. 555 .

United States v. Darrell Lee Brown

988 F.2d 122 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 1993

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell Lee BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10490. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 1, 1993. … Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

Anthony Marcella v. United States

285 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 3, 1961

United States, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 772 ; Todorow v. United States, 9 Cir., 173 F.2d 439 ; Catrino v. United States, 9 Cir., 176 F.2d 884 ; Doherty v. United States, 9 Cir., 230 F.2d 605 ; Cowell v. … Browning.” We find no merit on the question of insufficiency of the evidence on any count.

Rickman Brown v. Eva Sperber-Porter

711 F. App'x 416 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 2018

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICKMAN BROWN; et al., No. 17-15121 Petitioners-Appellees, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-02801-SRB v. … Brown Co. v. Super. Ct., 490 P.2d 867, 869 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). The Arbitrator’s award thus did not conflict with the “express guidelines” of the arbitration agreement. Pasqualetti, 525 P.2d at 313.

United States v. Raymond Eugene Johnson

626 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 1980

In Brown v. … The Court in Dunaway elaborated on the Brown doctrine stating: Brown articulated a test designed to vindicate the “distinct policies and interests of the Fourth Amendment.” Following Wong Sun [v. U.

Planned Parenthood of Southern Nevada, Inc. v. Clark County School District

887 F.2d 935 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 11, 1989

See Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v. Fox, — U.S. -, -, 109 S.Ct. 3028, 3031-3035 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989); Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. … Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1981).

United States v. Robert Deleon, Jr.

955 F.2d 1346 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 1992

In Franks v. … In United States v.

Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board v. Zcon Builders, Individually and D/B/A Sharon Hill Corporation Sharon Hill Corporation

96 F.3d 410 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 1996

The arbitration was undertaken pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between Zcon Builders and Appellee Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board (“Carpenters”). … In George Day Const. v.