Case law

Francisco Garcia-Mendez v. Loretta E. Lynch

788 F.3d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2015

GARCIA-MENDEZ V. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000) (“The meaning—or ambiguity—of certain words or phrases may only become 12 GARCIA-MENDEZ V. LYNCH evident when placed in context.”).

United States v. Erika Brown

655 F. App'x 562 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 12, 2016

No. 6:15-cr-00001-SEH-1 v. MEMORANDUM* ERIKA RAE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … United States v. Hinkson, 585 F.3d 1247, 1251 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

Earl Perkins v. Marine Terminals Corporation, and Pacific Employers Insurance Co., Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Marine Terminals Corporation, and Pacific Employers Insurance Co.

673 F.2d 1097 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1982

As the Board noted in Lasky v. … Clark & Son of Boston, Inc., 539 F.2d 264 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 908 , 97 S.Ct. 2972 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1092 (1977); Brown v. Reynolds Shipyard, 9 BRBS 614 (1979); Nalej v. H. W.

Michael R. Turpin v. Stanley S. Resor, as Secretary of the Army of the United States

452 F.2d 240 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 1971

Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686 (D.C.N.J.1967), aff’d 387 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1967). However, the Defense Department, viewing 50 U.S.C. … Burns v. Wilson, 346 U.S. 137, 140 , 73 S.Ct. 1045, 1048 , 97 L.Ed. 1508 (1953). See also, Orloff v.

Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department

195 F.3d 1065 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 1999

See Boise Cascade Corp. v. … First, the Board argues that state and local governments can regulate and ban outdoor tobacco advertising under Packer Corp. v. Utah , 285 U.S. 105 (1932).

Swayne & Hoyt, Inc. v. Barsch

226 F. 581 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 9, 1915

C.) 10 Fed. 137 ; The Ottawa, 1 Brown’s Adm. 356, Fed. Cas. No. 10,616; The Mary Garrett (D. C.) 63 Fed. 1009 ; The Maud Webster, 8 Ben. 547 , Fed. Cas. No. 9,302; Bain v. Sandusky Transportation Co. (D. … In Steamship Co. v.

David Joseph Brown v. United States

9 F.3d 1550 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 4, 1993

See Strickland v. … Under these circumstances, the rental agreement cannot be considered exculpatory evidence favorable to Brown's defense, see United States v.

Tilden v. United States

21 F.2d 967 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 17, 1927

In the court below the plaintiffs in error, who constitute the board of state harbor commissioners of California, were adjudged to pay a penalty of $100 for violation of section 2 of tb© *968 Safety Appliance Act, approved … The writ of error presents the questions which were before this court in MeCallum v. United States (C. C. A.) 298 F. 373 , 38 A. L.

Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. U. S. A. Motel Corp.

450 F.2d 499 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 21, 1971

Appellants Caruso and CEI, together with two interve-nors, Day and Brown Insurance Company and Mr. … Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Dameron, 406 F.2d 803, 806 (4th Cir. 1969) ; Janaf Shopping Center, Inc. v.

United States v. Brone

792 F.2d 1504 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1986

See United States v. Ippolito, 774 F.2d 1482,1486 (9th Cir.1985); United States v. Brown, 761 F.2d 1272, 1275-76 (9th Cir.1985). … Brown, 761 F.2d at 1275 .

James Hendricks v. Airline Pilots Association, International and United Airlines, Inc.

696 F.2d 673 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 10, 1983

Railway Express Agency, Inc., 321 U.S. 342, 347 , 64 S.Ct. 582, 585 , 88 L.Ed. 788 (1944); Cox & Dunlop, Regulation of Collective Bargaining by the National Labor Relations Board, 63 Harv.L. … Toensing v. Brown, 528 F.2d 69, 72 (9th Cir.1975). But retirees are not “employees” and hence are not members of the bargaining unit, and their benefits are not a mandatory subject of bargaining.

Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department Of

682 F.3d 789 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 2012

Ctr. for Bio-ethical Reform, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 455 F.3d 910, 920 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Transp., 321 F.3d 1217, 1222 (9th Cir. 2002). … Twelve years later, in Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System v.

Hays v. Postmaster General of the United States

868 F.2d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1989

We agree that “[allowing a party to withhold important issues from the board and later present them to this court would undermine the board’s authority.” Lizut, 717 F.2d at 1396 . B. … See also Hymen v. Merit Sys.

Roderick Go v. Eric Holder, Jr.

744 F.3d 604 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2014

See, e.g., Singh v. … We review the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 983 (9th Cir.2005).

Willis A. Holden

174 F. 5 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 9, 1909

By this time the Plolden had taken in the 10-inch hawser, and this was passed on board the Nelson and made fast. … In McConnochie v. Kerr (D.

Manuel Olivas-Motta v. Matthew Whitaker

910 F.3d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 19, 2018

Olivas-Motta v. Holder, 746 F.3d 907, 917 (9th Cir. 2013), as amended (April 1, 2014); see also Ali v. Holder, 637 F.3d 1025, 1029 (9th Cir. 2011) (confining our review to grounds relied upon by the Board). … Accordingly, the rule of mandate did not foreclose the Board’s reconsideration of the issue. V.

United States v. Chet Govan

152 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 1998

See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); United States v. Nash, 115 F.3d 1431, 1435 (9th Cir.1997); United States v. Iriarte-Ortega, 113 F.3d 1022 , 1024 n. 2 (9th Cir.1997). … Govan claims this ease is similar to United States v.

Hume v. J. D. Spreckels & Bros.

115 F. 51 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 17, 1902

Williamson v. Alphonso, 30 Fed. Cas. 4 ; The Centurion, 5 Fed. Cas. 369 ; The M. B. Stetson, 16 Fed. Cas. 1,273 ; The H. B. Foster, 11 Fed. Cas. 948 . … S.) 243; Id., Brown. & L. 113; The Fusilier, 3 Moore, P. C. (N. S.) 51; Id., Brown. & L. 341.” We find no such reason for reducing the judgment in the present case. The decree of the district court is therefore affirmed.

United States v. Umagat

998 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 1993

Id. at 588; United States v. Brown, 912 F.2d 1040, 1043 (9th Cir.1990). … We find United States v. Brown, supra, controlling.

Manuela Villa v. Maricopa County

865 F.3d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 2, 2017

v. 2:14-cv-01681- DJH MARICOPA COUNTY; MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY, OPINION … V.