Case law

Nancy Jewell Cross v. John A. Bruning, County Clerk of San Mateo County, California

413 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 15, 1969

Bruning, Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County, and William M. Werder, filed a similar motion and a further motion to affirm the judgment. … Browning /s/ Ben C. Duniway Circuit Judges Cross “appealed” this court’s decision to the Supreme Court of the United States. That Court on October 10, 1966, in Cross v.

Libertarian Party Los Angeles v. Debra Bowen

709 F.3d 867 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 2013

LIBERTARIAN PARTY V . … Plaintiffs Brown and Agrella live in California and would like to serve as circulators in political subdivisions other than their own.

Vasquez v. Los Angeles County

487 F.3d 1246 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 15, 2007

See Lemon, 403 U.S. at 612-13 , 91 S.Ct. 2105 ; Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified Sch. Dist., 27 F.3d 1373, 1378 (9th Cir.1994). … Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified Sch. Dist., 27 F.3d 1373, 1378 (9th Cir.1994) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted).

Gayle Meshawn Brown v. United States

141 F.3d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 23, 1998

See United States v. … United States v.

Richard Clark v. Kevin Chappell

936 F.3d 944 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 2019

Briggs  CLARK V. CHAPPELL 65 v. Brown, 400 P.3d 29, 47 (Cal. 2017) (quoting In re William Clark, 855 P.2d at 763–70). … Rather, Brown took steps to eliminate any adverse effect: Brown terminated representation of Williams; Brown and Allen each attested that Brown did not disclose to Allen any confidential information from Brown’s representation

Misischia v. Pirie

60 F.3d 626 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 20, 1995

Misischia also argues that the district court should have reviewed the Board’s procedure for compliance with the federal decree in Pekarsky v. Ariyoshi, Civil No. 76-0455 (D.Haw.1980); see also Pekarsky v. … See Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 106 , 104 S.Ct. 900, 911 , 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984); Han v.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Ass'n of Bridge

891 F.3d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2018

We consolidated these four actions and stayed proceedings pending the outcome of National Labor Relations Board v. … V.

Keith Chandler v. California Board of Prison Terms Attorney General of the State of California

59 F.3d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 1995

Keith CHANDLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-16795. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. … Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir.1994) (citing Rule 2(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. Sec. 2254).

United States v. Antwan E. Brown

131 F.3d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 1997

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwan E. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-36077. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted November 17, 1997 ** Decided Nov. 20, 1997. … Brown, No. 95-30129, unpublished memorandum disposition (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 1995). Accordingly, Brown cannot use this section 2255 motion to reargue the matter. See United States v.

Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew Cate

757 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 1, 2014

See Larsen v. … At trial, prosecution witness Kevin Brown testified that he saw Stewart at his football practice, where Stewart told him "I shot your homeboy.” Brown assumed Stewart was referring to one of the Parish brothers.

Vardoui Kaladjian v. Jefferson Sessions, III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 2018

See Bonilla v. … See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 824 (9th Cir. 2011) (“no significant changes” occurred since Ekimian v.

Vito Balice, Individually and as the Agent of O. R. C. Company v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Opinion

203 F.3d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 8, 2000

See Cole v. U.S. … See United States v.

United States v. David Joseph Brown

134 F.3d 379 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 15, 1998

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Joseph BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-10004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 12, 1998. ** Decided Jan. 15, 1998. … R. 36-3 1 We decline to address Brown's First Amendment and due process challenges to section 3573, because he did not present these arguments to the district court. See United States v.

Browning v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 2009

P. 43(c)(2). 6079  BROWNING v. … Dist., 249 F.3d 786 (8th Cir. 2001), and Fite v. Digital Equip. Corp., 232 F.3d 3 (1st Cir. 2000), and Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340 (7th Cir. 1994). 6086 BROWNING v.

Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc.

960 F.2d 1401 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 1991

Bloom v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 734 F.Supp. 1553, 1559 (C.D.Cal.1990) (section 301 can preempt state law claim against defendants who did not sign CBA), aff'd, 933 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir.1991); Brown v. … Id. at 208 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 887 (quoting Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 111 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901, 906 (1976)).

Candaso v. Manibusan

405 F.2d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

Before JERTBERG, BROWNING and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. … De Castro v. Board of Com'rs of San Juan, 322 U.S. 451 , 64 S.Ct. 1121 , 88 L.Ed. 1384 (1944); Bonet v. Texas Co. (P.R.), Inc., 308 U.S. 463 , 60 S.Ct. 349 , 84 L.Ed. 401 (1940); Advertiser Publishing Company v.

San Francisco National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People v. San Francisco Unified School District

284 F.3d 1163 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 2002

Stewart, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Peter Graham Cohn, Petaluma, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. … Alexander v.

Nve Constructors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Laborers' International Union of North America, Local No. 1184, Intervenor

934 F.2d 1084 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 1991

“Furthermore, a Board rule is entitled to deference even if it represents a departure from the Board’s prior policy.” Id. (citing NLRB v. J. … NLRB v.

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

707 F.2d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 1983

Compare NLRB v. … NLRB v.

United States v. Daniel Brown

671 F. App'x 681 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 2016

The record reflects that, even if the district court misstated the duration of Brown’s illegal activity, that characterization did not affect Brown’s substantial rights. See United States v. … The court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Brown’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).