Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.85s
436 F. App'x 765 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 7, 2011
No. 2:09-cr-01189-R v. MEMORANDUM * LEON BROWN, a.k.a. B-Rock, Defendant - Appellant. … The government agrees that our case law requires vacatur of the condition prohibiting Brown from associating with persons associated with the Athens Park Bloods gang. See United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAlice Brown v. County of Del Norte
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 28, 2020
ALICE BROWN, No. 19-15017 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-07235-RMI v. … Brown also asserts that vacatur and remand is warranted to allow the district court to consider her Eighth Amendment claim in light of Martin v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished824 F.2d 806 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 13, 1987
See also Brown v. Capitol Air, Inc., 797 F.2d 106, 108 (2d Cir.1986) (“Rule 11, of course, does not purport to authorize sanctions for actions taken in state courts.”). … In Vaca v.
Cited 46 timesPublished680 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1982
The opinion of this court, Jensen v. Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, 641 F.2d 797 (1981) is hereby vacated. Great Western Sugar Co. v. … Nelson, 442 U.S. 92 , 99 S.Ct. 2149 , 60 L.Ed.2d 735 (1979); see United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 , 71 S.Ct. 104 , 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Of Nevada Employees Assoc., Inc. v. Keating
903 F.2d 1223 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 18, 1990
Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Washoe County, 96 Nev. 718 , 615 P.2d 972, 974 (1980). Other courts consider pension rights of non-vested employees to be non-contractual gratuities. See, e.g., Creps v. … Public Employees' Retirement Board, 615 P.2d at 974-5 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedWorldwide Church of God v. McNair
805 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 1986
Allen v. … See also Brown v.
Cited 351 timesPublished53 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1995
DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY; Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation Board of Directors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16364. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. … Denton, 112 S.Ct. at 1733 ; Jackson v.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 F.3d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 1994
(n. 7); see also United States v. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished510 F.3d 1045 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 2007
Clark v. Brown, 450 F.3d 898, 905 (9th Cir.2006), as amended (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Beardslee, 358 F.3d at 578 . … Victor v.
Cited 8 timesPublished82 F.3d 291 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 17, 1996
Vlandis v. … In Hillside Community Hosp. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished402 F.2d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1969
Sharpe, 1954, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 ; Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; Sweatt v. … State of California, 1948, 332 U.S. 633, 663 , 68 S.Ct. 269 , 92 L.Ed. 249 (Murphy, J., concurring) ; Sipuel v. Board of Regents, etc., 1948, 332 U.S. 631 , 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. 247 ; Edwards v.
Cited 27 timesPublished893 F.2d 1128 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 1990
This is not a distinction made by the Board, and we do not know whether the Board would impose such a distinction. See Local Union No. 2338, Int'l Bhd. Electrical Workers v. … NLRB, 499 F.2d 542 , 544 (D.C.Cir.1974) ("reasons for Board action are to be supplied by the Board, and not by counsel as its surrogate”); see also SEC v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFratus v. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
599 F. App'x 707 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 6, 2015
Ass’n v. City of Berkeley, 114 F.3d 840, 847 (9th Cir. 1997). … United States v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished483 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1973
S & W Holding Co. v. Kuriansky, 317 F.2d 666, 668-669 (2d Cir. 1963). See also In re Buttonwood Securities, Inc., 349 F.Supp. 273, 278 (S.D.Cal.1972). Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Cited 24 timesPublishedBuchanan v. County of Humboldt
50 F. App'x 343 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 2002
See L.W. v. … Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).
Cited 0 timesPublished877 F.2d 1415 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 21, 1989
The Board's fiduciary duties, however, are owed only to participants and beneficiaries of the trust. C. Colteryahn Dairy v. … Kaiser Steel Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCathleen Brown v. Nancy Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 2018
Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110-11 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm. The ALJ did not err in evaluating Brown’s testimony. … The ALJ did not err in formulating Brown’s RFC by failing to include in the hypothetical to the vocational expert restrictions that Brown’s attorney added when questioning the vocational expert. See Magallanes v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished431 F. App'x 528 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 2011
The district court entered judgment for defendants on Brown’s claims for compensatory and punitive damages and dismissed Brown’s claim for declaratory and injunctive relief as moot. … As a result, Brown was not a prevailing party, see Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished431 F. App'x 536 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 2011
See Brown v. … The district court properly exercised its discretion by denying Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel because Brown failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. See Palmer v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTrinidad Corp. v. S.S. Keiyoh Maru
845 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 25, 1988
Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 173 F.2d 108, 109 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom. Gulf Oil Corp. v. M/V The John A. … Co. v. M/V Bodena, 829 F.2d 293, 311 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied sub. nom. J.E. Bernard & Co. v. Ingersoll Milling Mach.
Cited 36 timesPublished
Ask Donna