Case law

Remsen v. Daly

85 F. App'x 582 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 8, 2004

See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133 , 1136-37 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc).

Alexander Hebrard v. Jeremy Nofziger

90 F.4th 1000 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 11, 2024

Plaintiff-Appellant, 6:19-cv-01498- YY v. JEREMY M. NOFZIGER; OPINION BRANDON KELLY; JASON BROWN; C. … See Samson v. Brown, 486 P.3d 59, 61 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). Given the complaint and final disciplinary report use the term “earned-time” credits, we will do so as well. 8 HEBRARD V.

Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. Cyr

200 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 1952

O’Leary, Deputy Com’r v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 ; Contractors v. Pillsbury, Deputy Com’r, 9 Cir., 150 F.2d 310 . … Southern Stevedoring Company v. Voris, Deputy Commissioner, 5 Cir., 190 F.2d 275 .

Local v. Local

507 F.2d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 1975

Carey v. … Boire v.

Fa v. Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 2024

Even if Fa’s explanation is plausible, “the IJ and Board were not compelled to accept [his] explanation for the discrepancy.” See Li v. Garland, 13 F.4th 954, 961 (9th Cir. 2021); see id. … (“Particularly because Li was assisted by counsel, the Board and IJ were not required to accept Li’s explanation for the discrepancy, and the record does not compel a contrary conclusion.”); Dong v.

Gus F. Mienke, Jr. v. United States

452 F.2d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 1972

United States v. Avey, 428 F.2d 1159 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Miranda, 426 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1970); Fernandez v. … stated in his dissent in United States v.

Hotel, Motel And Restaurant Employees And Bartenders Union Local No. 19 v. National Labor Relations Board

785 F.2d 796 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 25, 1986

P 11,830 HOTEL, MOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS UNION LOCAL NO. 19, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … Although a reviewing court reviews questions of law de novo it should give considerable deference to the Board's expertise in construing and applying the labor laws. United States v.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 720 v. National Labor Relations Board

626 F.2d 119 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 1980

EAST, District Judge: The Union petitions for a review and the Board cross-applies for enforcement of the Board’s order of July 26, 1976. 243 NLRB No. 128 . … E. g., Prestige Bedding Co., 212 NLRB 690 (1974); NLRB v. Local 169, Int’l Teamsters, 111 NLRB 460 , enforced, 228 F.2d 425 (3d Cir. 1955).

Hossein G. Vahedi Fatemeh G. Vahedi, AKA Fatemeh Hessam v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

53 F.3d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1995

Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. … Sec. 3.1(d)(1-a)(i)(A). 1 4 In Padilla-Agustin v.

Harris v. County of Orange

682 F.3d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2012

In Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors of Mono Cnty., 502 P.2d 1049, 1062–63 (Cal. 1972), disapproved on other grounds by Kowis v. … Brown, Moscone Emblidge & Sater LLP, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Arthur A. Hartinger, Jennifer L.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's And Warehousemen's Union, Local 17

431 F.2d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 1970

P 11,118 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S AND WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 17, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S AND WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, Respondent. No. 23910. … See NLRB v. General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734, 743 , 83 S.Ct. 1453 , 10 L.Ed.2d 670 (1963); NLRB v. National Automotive Fibres, Inc., 277 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1960); NLRB v.

Darrell Williams v. Brown

678 F. App'x 586 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 2017

No. 2:10-cv-02043-JAM- DAD v. BROWN, Nurse, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellee. … Toguchi v.

James Delbert Smith v. United States

409 F.2d 1188 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 10, 1969

See Saylor v. United States Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 206 , 345 F.2d 100 (1965); Sadler v. United States, 313 F.2d 106 (10th Cir. 1963); Jenkins v. Madigan, 211 F.2d 904 (7th Cir. 1954); Normandale v. … Mock v. United States Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 (1965).

Wallace Brown, Iii v. Department of Public Safety, S

446 F. App'x 70 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 2011

I Brown failed to demonstrate that, in connection to the “Operation Mandingo” incident, he suffered an adverse employment action. See Davis v. … King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.1987). Here, Brown is not pro se. The June 30, 2008 letter was drafted by Brown’s counsel, who is not “unschooled in the technicalities of formal pleading.”

In Re: James Ellett, Debtor. Gerald Goldberg, Executive Director of the Franchise Tax Bap Board v. James Ellett

254 F.3d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 27, 2001

Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Brown, 124 F.3d 1179, 1184 (9th Cir.1997). … As support, he cites Schatz v. Franchise Tax Board, 69 Cal.App.4th 595 , 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 719 (1999).

Todd Roberts v. Springfield Utility Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 2023

No. 6:19-cv-01595-MC v. MEMORANDUM* SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD, a Public Body; et al., Defendants-Appellees. … Miller v.

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the L.A. MART, Defendant-Appellee

68 F.3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 20, 1995

Prudential argues that the approach taken by the California Supreme Court in Sewell Sheet Metal v. Loverde, 70 Cal.2d 666 , 75 Cal.Rptr. 889 , 451 P.2d 721 (1969), and most recently in Brown v. … Brown, 35 Cal.Rptr.2d at 607 , 884 P.2d at 64 .

Washington State Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. v. Frank Forrest

839 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 8, 1988

Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 , 100 S.Ct. 937 , 63 L.Ed.2d 233 (1980), and a state administrative board regulating new franchises, New Motor Vehicle Bd. of California v. Orrin W. … This court, in Patrick v. Burget, did not require active supervision of a state medical board of examiners to find that an individual board member's actions were immune from antitrust liability. 800 F.2d at 1506-07 .

Orlando Garcia v. Gateway Hotel L.P.

82 F.4th 750 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 2023

Relying on Brown v. … But, Brown is not our only relevant precedent. In Green v.

National Conference of Personal Managers, Inc. v. Brown

599 F. App'x 275 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 2015

See Steel Co. v. … See Lee v.