Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Searle Auto Glass, Inc., D/B/A Best Glass Company

833 F.2d 1016 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 10, 1987

833 F.2d 1016 National Labor Relations Board v. Searle Auto Glass, Inc., d/b/a Best Glass Company NO. 86-7593 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. NOV 10, 1987 1 Appeal From: N.L.R.B. 2 ORDER ENFORCED.

United States v. Warren Gerald Harding

461 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1972

United States v. Norman, 412 F.2d 629, 631 (9th Cir. 1969), Petrie v. United States, 407 F.2d 267, 275 (9th Cir. 1969) (In Banc). … There is no reason to believe that the members of the local board did not have a similar view of appellant's tactics. 12 Appellant's speedy trial Sixth Amendment argument is answered by United States v.

Ascherman v. Presbyterian Hospital of Pacific Medical Center, Inc.

507 F.2d 1103 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 1974

Board of Managers of Val Verde Memorial Hospital, 5 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 173, 174 ; Foster v. Mobile County Hospital Board, 5 Cir., 1968, 398 F.2d 227, 230 ; Meredith v. … Isenbarger, 7 Cir., 1971, 445 F.2d 412 ; Browns v. Mitchell, 10 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 593, 595-596 . What I believe to be the correct rule is stated by Judge Friendly in Powe v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brotherhood Of Teamsters And Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 85

458 F.2d 222 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 30, 1972

P 12,558 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS AND AUTO TRUCK DRIVERS LOCAL NO. 85, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent. … N.L.R.B. v. Technicolor Motion Pictures Corp., 248 F.2d 348, 356 (9th Cir.1957). In N.L.R.B. v.

MEZA-VALLEJOS v. Holder

660 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 11, 2011

Board to grant an extension of voluntary departure where this Board has already provided . . . the maxi- mum period of voluntary departure allowed,” and that “this Board does not have the authority to further extend [Meza … V). Id.

Miller v. California Pacific Medical Center

991 F.2d 536 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 13, 1993

Nonetheless, the Board urges and the district court held, the standard for issuing preliminary injunctions under section 10(j) is different. Specifically, the Board maintains Scott ex rel. NLRB v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Pacific Tel. & Tel., 218 F.2d 542 , 544-45 (9th Cir.1954) (Pope, J., concurring).

The Boeing Company, Formerly Boeing Airplane Company v. The Renegotiation Board of the United States of America

325 F.2d 885 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 1963

The Renegotiation Board asks us to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. We conclude that the Board’s position is correct and that this proceeding must be dismissed. … (See Golbert v.

The Associated Press v. Otter

682 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2012

VAN TASSEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Idaho Board of Correction; JAY NIELSEN, in his official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Idaho Board of Correction; BRENT REINKE, in his official capacity as the Director … Brown, Lewiston, Idaho, for the Plaintiffs-Appellants. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Steven L. Olsen, Chief of Civil Litigation; Michael S. Gilmore, Deputy Attorney General; Mark A.

Community Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and Board of Governors of the Federalreserve System

500 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1974

See American Bank and Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 262 U.S. 643 , 43 S.Ct. 649 , 67 L.Ed. 1153 (1923). … The appellant State Banks heavily rest their contention on Farmers and Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 262 U.S. 649 , 43 S.Ct. 651 , 67 L.Ed. 1157 (1923).

Marlene Leorna v. United States Department of State Warren M. Christopher, Secretary of the United States Department of State

105 F.3d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 1997

Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). The procedures for submitting an employment discrimination claim to the State Department are set forth at 29 C.F.R. … See Brown, 425 U.S. at 832 , 96 S.Ct. at 1967 . B.

United States v. Brown

935 F.2d 276 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 1991

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre Mitchell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. 1 No. 89-20536. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. … United States v. Kessi, 868 F.2d 1097, 1107 (9th Cir.1989); United States v.

Kenney v. Louie

128 F. 856 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 1904

Brown v. Overton, 4 Spr. 462 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,024; The Chandos (D. C.) 4 Fed. 645 ; The City of Alexandria *859 (D. C.) 17 Fed. 390 ; The Vigilant (D. C.) 30 Fed. 288 ; The J. F. Card (D. C.) 43 Fed. 92 ; Gabrielson v. … Not only does the opinion in the Osceola Case express no disapproval of the doctrine of these decisions, but it incidentally cites the two' leading cases of Brown v.

Sarahrose Kilpatrick v. Kilolo Kijakazi

35 F.4th 1187 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 27, 2022

Brown, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 8, 2021 Portland, Oregon Filed May 27, 2022 Before: William A. Fletcher, Sandra S. … Relying on Buck v.

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1

294 F.3d 1084 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 2002

Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AG, 196 F.3d 1075, 1076 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 46 , 117 S.Ct. 1055 , 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997)).

In Re: Kirk Brown v. Roxana Chamouille

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 13, 2024

--------------- MEMORANDUM* KIRK BROWN, Appellant, v. … Chamouille v. Brown, No. B321555, 2023 WL 5361571, at *6 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 22, 2023) (concluding that “Brown raise[d] no issue that is even arguably correct”). 2. Monetary damages.

Baumgartner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

51 F.2d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 20, 1931

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Board of Tax Appeals. 21 B. T. A. 623. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 , 51 S. Ct. 140 , 75 L. Ed. 343 . To discuss, apply, or distinguish the numerous decisions could serve no useful purpose. The'order is affirmed.

Henry C. Hicks v. City of Los Angeles, a Corporation Board of Civil Service Commissioners, Etc.

240 F.2d 495 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1957

the Board of Public Works and its members as defendants. … Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 ; Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 . By that we mean due process.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1547 v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F. App'x 814 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 26, 2002

Beasley v. Food Fair of North Carolina, 416 U.S. 653, 662 , 94 S.Ct. 2023 , 40 L.Ed.2d 443 (1974). A fortiori, that is true when the supervisors are the governing board of the company. … We must defer to the Board’s reasonable interpretation of the NLRA. Allentown Mack Sales and Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 364 , 118 S.Ct. 818 , 139 L.Ed.2d 797 (1998).

Richard E. Garrett v. United States Lines, Inc. And United States of America, United States Lines, Inc., Cross-Complainant-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Defendant-Appellee

574 F.2d 997 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 8, 1978

The court concluded that the Navy owed little or no duty to Garrett, a trespasser making an unauthorized boarding of the LCM for purposes inimical to the legitimate interests of the Navy. Kermarec v. … The LCM was not on board, Petterson v. Alaska S.S. Co., 205 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1953), aff'd, 347 U.S. 396 , 74 S.Ct. 601 , 98 L.Ed. 798 (1954), nor moored to, Bradshaw v.

United States v. Steven Allen Boyd

473 F.2d 674 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 1973

Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. … A letter he then submitted to the board so states. 22 United States v. Stupke (9 Cir. 1971) 451 F.2d 997 is in point.