Case law

Jiwan Singh v. Immigration And Naturalization Service

456 F.2d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 13, 1972

Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant; Will Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul C. Summitt, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. … We find the Service's arguments more persuasive than Singh's and, accordingly, reverse the District Court's decision. 11 Singh urges this Court to follow Quintana v.

Diane Y. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. Lawrence GARRETT, III, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee

10 F.3d 1421 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 1994

We review the Board’s order to make sure that the Board applied the correct legal standards and the entire administrative record to ascertain whether its findings are supported by substantial evidence. Young v. … Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (c), we must set aside a Board decision that is not in accordance with applicable law or is not supported by substantial record evidence. See Lindahl v.

United States v. Burreson

643 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 9, 1981

No connection between the defendants was established other than that each obtained his fraudulent loan through Brown. … Brown, 551 F.2d 639, 647 , rev’d on other grounds, 569 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc).

National Labor Relations Board v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc. Patrick Pettit Elmer Lee Pettit David A. Adams

102 F.3d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 19, 1996

The Board may issue subpoenas requiring both the production of evidence and testimony during the investigatory stages of an unfair labor practice proceeding. See NLRB v. … “[T]he Board’s power to issue investigatory subpoenas does not depend on the filing of a complaint.” Id. at 512 (citing Link v.

Aaron Zamora v. Arizona Board of Regents

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 13, 2026

MEMORANDUM* ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a political subdivision of the state of Arizona, and Arizona State University, a public university; ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendants-Appellees. … Students’ Ass’n v. Ariz.

William E. H. TAGUPA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Research Corp., University of Hawaii, Defendants-Appellees

633 F.2d 1309 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 1980

Defendants cite McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Crawford v. Western Electric Co.

National Labor Relations Board v. Fishermen & Allied Workers Union, Local 33, International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union

448 F.2d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 1971

NLRB v. Spector Freight Sys., Inc., 273 F.2d 272 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, Local 600, Highway and City Freight Drivers, Dockmen and Helpers v. N.L.R.B., 362 U.S. 962 , 80 S.Ct. 878 , 4 L.Ed.2d 877 (1960); NLRB v. … Authority for the Board’s position is found in NLRB v.

Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified School District No. 40 Of Pima County, Arizona v. Kirk

91 F.3d 1240 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 31, 1996

Seattle School District, No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 , 102 S.Ct. 3187 , 73 L.Ed.2d 896 (1982) and if we had not previously recognized that implicit holding in Board of Natural Resources v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937 (9th Cir.1993). … Id 10 See, e.g., Board of Education of Central School Dist. No. 1 v.

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. City & County Of San Francisco

121 F.3d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 1997

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Board of Supervisors; Assessment Appeals Board for the City and County of San Francisco; Doris Ward, Tax Assessor for the City and County of San Francisco; Thad Brown, Tax Assessor … In Franchise Tax Board of California v.

United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford

372 F.3d 1048 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 21, 2004

For that argument he relied on two detention cases, Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979), and Brown v. … Brown, 422 U.S. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 ; see also Taylor v.

Janet Eichelberger v. National Labor Relations Board, Office of Professional Employees International Union Local 2, Respondent- Intervenor

765 F.2d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 9, 1985

This standard does not change when the Board disagrees with prior AU findings; in this case, the latter are simply part of the record to be weighed against other evidence supporting the Board. Stamper v. … Vaca v.

Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City Of Carson

353 F.3d 824 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 2, 2004

Rochelle Browne, Peter M. Thorson, Richards Watson & Gershon, Los Angeles, California, for the defendants-appellees City of Carson and City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board. … Legal Found. v. Legal Found. of Wash., 271 F.3d 835, 851 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), aff'd by Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003).

The Daido Line v. Thomas P. Gonzalez, Corporation

299 F.2d 669 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1962

Milling Co. v. Hauptman, 95 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1938). See also The Niel Maersk, 91 F.2d 932 (2d Cir. 1937), cert. denied 302 U.S. 753 , 58 S.Ct. 281 , 82 L.Ed. 582 . But see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 277 F.2d 9 (4th Cir. 1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 879 , 81 S.Ct. 168 , 5 L.Ed.2d 102 . 6 . See generally 27 Texas L.Rev. 525 (1949).

Joint Board Of Control Of The Flathead, Mission And Jocko Irrigation Districts v. United States

832 F.2d 1127 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 17, 1987

832 F.2d 1127 JOINT BOARD OF CONTROL OF the FLATHEAD, MISSION AND JOCKO IRRIGATION DISTRICTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. … The Joint Board of Control of the Flathead, Mission and Jocko Irrigation Districts v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 73, Afl-Cio

621 F.2d 1035 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1980

Florida Power & Light Co., v. International Brotherhood of Elec. Workers, 417 U.S. 790, 803 , 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2743 , 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974). … Enforcement of the Board’s order is denied.

National Labor Relations Board v. Van De Kamp's Holland-Dutch Bakeries, Inc.

154 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 26, 1946

This requires objection before the Board to the specific portion of its order complaint of to give the circuit court of appeals power to consider it. National Labor Relations Board v. … Cheney California Lumber Company, 66 S.Ct. 553 ; Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 318 U.S. 253, 256 , 63 S.Ct. 585 , 87 L.Ed. 744 .

Jonathon Castro v. County of Los Angeles

833 F.3d 1060 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 2016

In Pembaur v. … In Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v.

Whitney v. Arntz

320 F. App'x 799 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 2009

MEMORANDUM * Whitney, Hadley, Brelle and Kornow-Brown (collectively, Whitney) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment for Arntz. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 . … See Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Sup.

Stromberg-Carlson Communications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

580 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 1978

Waterway Terminals Co. v. NLRB, 467 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1972). The Board asks us to reexamine that decision but we decline to do so. The motion to dismiss is denied. … See, e. g., NLRB v. Plasterers’ Local Union No. 79, 404 U.S. 116 , 92 S.Ct. 360 , 30 L.Ed.2d 312 (1971). Petitioner does not contend that IBEW wanted the work on the United Parcels job.

Roberto Roldan-Figueroa v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

5 F.3d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 1993

BIA 2 PETITION DENIED. 3 Before: BROWNING, FARRIS AND KELLY, ** Circuit Judges. 4 MEMORANDUM *** 5 Roberto Roldan-Figueroa, a citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' affirmance of a final order … Sangabi v. INS, 763 F.2d 374, 375 (9th Cir.1984) (motion to reopen); Rodriguez v. INS, 841 F.2d 865, 867 (9th Cir.1987) (holding that motion to remand is treated the same as motion to reopen).