Case law

Local No. 2880, Lumber & Sawmill Workers Union, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations Board

158 F.2d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 22, 1946

Medo Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 678, 681 , 64 S.Ct. 830, 832 , 88 L.Ed. 1007 . … We agree with the Board that its conclusion is supported by the following from, the decision of the Supreme Court in, Wallace Corporation v.

Jeffrey Sulitzer v. Joseph Tippins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2022

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). 3 After a second round of briefing, the district court nonetheless dismissed the Sherman Act claim, holding that the Complaint only pled “an agreement consistent with the Dental Board’s regulatory … Noting that the Board Actors could not demonstrate active state supervision, the district court rejected their argument that they were home free under Parker v. Brown’s state-action immunity doctrine.

Kearney v. Foley & Lardner, LLP

566 F.3d 826 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 2009

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOAN BROWN KEARNEY,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 07-55566 … v.

Jerryal Culler v. Board of Prison Terms

405 F. App'x 263 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 13, 2010

No. 3:07-cv-01552-WHA v. MEMORANDUM * BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Respondent - Appellee. … No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED. 2 09-16114

Llewellyn v. Crothers

765 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 1985

Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 314 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), as actions of the State of Oregon in its sovereign capacity. See Hoover v. … Even if regarded as a private party, SAIF has immunity under Parker v. Brown for its conduct taken pursuant to the rules and regulations of the OWCD.

John Rambo, Claimant-Petitioner v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Metropolitan Stevedore Company

81 F.3d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 10, 1996

LaFaille v. Benefits Review Board, 884 F.2d 54, 62 (2nd Cir.1989); Hole v. Miami Shipyards Corp., 640 F.2d 769, 772 (5th Cir.1981); Randall v. … Browning, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation

Garrett v. Lehman

751 F.2d 997 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 8, 1985

the Board). … Goldburg, 453 U.S. 57, 66 , 101 S.Ct. 2646, 2652 , 69 L.Ed.2d 478 (1981) (recognizing strong need for "a healthy deference to legislative and executive judgments in the area of military affairs); Brown v.

Clovis Unified School District v. California Office Of Administrative Hearings

903 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1990

Similarly, in Board of Education v. … In Jefferson County Board of Education v.

C.S. ex rel. Sundberg v. Governing Board of Riverside Unified School District

321 F. App'x 630 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 6, 2009

Annette J. v. Clark County Sch. Dist., 267 F.3d 877, 888 (9th Cir.2001). The award or denial of compensatory damages is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Park ex rel. Park v. Anaheim Union High Sch. … See Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir.1994); Weston v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., 881 F.2d 814, 816 (9th Cir.1989). .

Jan Emil Donato v. United States

302 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 1962

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. … of 1-O (50 U.S.C.Appendix, 456(j)), which case was not rebutted; that there was no basis in fact for the board's classification of 1-A; that under Estep v.

Helene P. Pierre v. Frank M. Jordan, Secretary of State of California

333 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 1964

Stafford v. Superior Court, 9 Cir., 272 F.2d 407, 409 . The judgment is affirmed. 1 . Frank M. Jordan, Secretary of State, Edmund G. Brown, Governor, and Stanley Mosk, Attorney General. 2 . Benjamin S. … But see Mosher v.

Paul Joseph Janka Michael E. Newman v. Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board Federal Aviation Administration

925 F.2d 1147 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 1991

Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board, 857 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1988); Reid v. Engen, 765 F.2d 1457 (9th Cir.1985); Ferguson v. … Cassis v. Helms, 737 F.2d 545, 547 (6th Cir.1984) (Cassis); see also Twomey v. National Transportation Safety Board, 821 F.2d 63, 66 (1st Cir.1987).

United States v. Jack Osborn Watson, Jeffrey Craig Evenson, and Dale Stanley Browning

678 F.2d 765 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 2, 1982

Defendants Evenson and Browning were the only other persons on board. As the boarding party entered the cabin to inspect the vessel’s registration papers, one of them immediately noticed a heavy odor of marijuana. … See United States v.

Parents Involved In Community Schools v. Seattle School District

285 F.3d 1236 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 2002

Browne, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA; Russell C. … Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 745, Afl-Cio

450 F.2d 1255 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 1, 1971

The function of this court is to determine whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … In making its findings the Board need not ascribe to the signs words other than those of the signs themselves. N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Local 2133, 356 F.2d 464 , 465, 466 (C.A.9 1966).

National Labor Relations Board v. Gary E. Calkins Anna Rosa Calkins, D/B/A Indio Grocery Outlet

187 F.3d 1080 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 11, 1999

The Board’s interpretation of the NLRA is accorded deference as long as it is “rational and consistent” with the statute. See NLRB v. … The Board applied the balancing test it had announced in Jean Country v.

Blockbuster Videos, Inc. v. City of Tempe

141 F.3d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 1998

Opinion by Judge THOMPSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BROWNING. DAVID R. … The owner of a shopping center creates the sign package, subject to review and approval by the Tempe Design Review Board (the “Board”). Individual tenants may apply to the Board for variances from the sign package.

United States v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle

152 F.2d 243 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 3, 1945

It is managed by a board of fifteen directors who serve without compensation. … Brown v. La Societe, etc., 138 Cal. 475, 477 , 71 P. 516, 517 .

United States v. Norman Arthur Newlon

460 F.2d 1268 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 1972

Before MERRILL, BROWNING and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 This appeal is taken from conviction of failure to report for induction into the Armed Forces of the United States, a violation of 50 U.S.C.App. … In our judgment reversal is compelled by Fisher v. United States, 413 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir. 1969). See also Graves v.

Professional Programs Group v. Department of Commerce

29 F.3d 1349 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 1994

Buffalo v. Sunn, 854 F.2d 1158, 1161 (9th Cir.1988). … Dobronski v.