Case law

Harris v. Brown

338 F. App'x 660 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 16, 2009

See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 757 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); see also McMann v. … See People v.

Harris v. Brown

338 F. App'x 660 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 16, 2009

See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 757 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); see also McMann v. … See People v.

Bird v. Brown

338 F. App'x 573 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 2009

the California Court of Appeal affirmed Bird’s conviction, finding the state court’s use of the preliminary hearing transcript to determine whether the *575 prior conviction was a strike was not a violation of Apprendi v. … Franklin v. Johnson, 290 F.3d 1223, 1233, n. 3 (9th Cir.2002). That court held that the determination did not violate state law and that there was no Supreme Court law extending Apprendi to this context.

Langley v. Brown

204 F. App'x 597 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 1, 2006

Giles v. Hill Lewis Marce, 195 Ariz. 358 , 988 P.2d 143, 146 (1999). The district court did not err in granting summary judgment against Langley on his claim for attorney malpractice. … Langley failed to submit evidence of specific facts showing that there was a genuine issue whether Brown had committed malpractice during his representation of Langley. See Anderson v.

Marciano Plata v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

754 F.3d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 2014

Brown v. Plata, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1910, 1922 , 179 L.Ed.2d 969 (2011). … See Brown v. Plata, 131 S.Ct. at 1939 (noting the “long history of failed remedial orders” in the case).

Brown v. Mahoney

338 F. App'x 688 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 2009

Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging the Montana Board of Pardons and Parole’s (“Board”) 2003 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. … As Brown acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by Neal v. Shimoda, 131 F.3d 818 (9th Cir.1997).

Bird v. Brown

338 F. App'x 573 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 2009

the California Court of Appeal affirmed Bird’s conviction, finding the state court’s use of the preliminary hearing transcript to determine whether the *575 prior conviction was a strike was not a violation of Apprendi v. … Franklin v. Johnson, 290 F.3d 1223, 1233, n. 3 (9th Cir.2002). That court held that the determination did not violate state law and that there was no Supreme Court law extending Apprendi to this context.

Brown v. Mahoney

329 F. App'x 157 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 2009

Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the Montana Board of Pardons and Parole’s (“Board”) 2006 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. … Brown raises several constitutional claims relating to the Board’s 2006 denial of parole.

Brown v. Shinseki

336 F. App'x 591 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 2009

Walton v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 492 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir.2007). … Collings v. Longview Fibre Co., 63 F.3d 828, 833 (9th Cir.1995).

Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.

953 F.3d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2020

BROWN V. … BROWN V.

Brown v. Mahoney

329 F. App'x 157 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 2009

Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the Montana Board of Pardons and Parole’s (“Board”) 2006 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. … Brown raises several constitutional claims relating to the Board’s 2006 denial of parole.

Local Joint Executive Board v. National Labor Relations Board

515 F.3d 942 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 2008

STANDARD OF REVIEW The Board’s interpretation of the Act is accorded considerable deference as long as it is “rational and consistent” with the statute. NLRB v. Calkins, 187 F.3d 1080, 1085 (9th Cir.1999); NLRB v. … “If ‘there are conflicting interpretations of the facts, and the one adopted by the Board is supported by substantial evidence,’ we may not substitute our own interpretation.” UAW v.

Brown v. Valenzuela

324 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 2009

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm. … The district court properly dismissed the action because Brown failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he suffered an actual injury as a result of defendant’s conduct. See Lewis v.

Brown v. Palmateer

202 F. App'x 234 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 2006

See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1273 (9th Cir.2005). … Although Brown conceives of a more specific argument that could have been raised, his attorney’s argument fell within the “wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland, v.

Brown v. Valenzuela

324 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 2009

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm. … The district court properly dismissed the action because Brown failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he suffered an actual injury as a result of defendant’s conduct. See Lewis v.

Grant v. Brown

312 F. App'x 71 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 2009

Boyde v. … Under Strickland v.

Brown v. Gonzales

187 F. App'x 691 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2006

MEMORANDUM ** Douglas Brown, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) decision that he is ineligible for asylum or other relief because he has no well-founded … Shah v. INS, 220 F.3d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir.2000). Because the BIA found Brown credible, we take his testimony as true. Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646 , 652 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000).

Fuentez v. Brown

196 F. App'x 584 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 7, 2006

Bennett v. Mueller, 322 F.3d 573, 581-83 (9th Cir.2003). … Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 589 , 84 S.Ct. 841 , 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964); Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67 , 112 S.Ct. 475 , 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991).

Brown v. Gutierrez

316 F. App'x 590 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 2009

Appling v. State Farm, Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 340 F.3d 769, 780 (9th Cir.2003). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. Shanks v. Dressel, 540 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir.2008). We affirm. … The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Brown’s independent action because his allegations fail to state a claim for fraud on the court. See United States v.

Wasson v. Brown

316 F. App'x 663 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 5, 2009

Bd. of Natural Res. v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937 , 945 (9th Cir.1993). … See Lewis v.