Opinion

Brown v. Mahoney

  • 329 F. App'x 157
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jul 22, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Schroeder, Thomas, Wardlaw
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.6%

The opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Montana state prisoner Anthel L. Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the Montana Board of Pardons and Parole’s (“Board”) 2006 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.

Brown raises several constitutional claims relating to the Board’s 2006 denial of parole. Upon independent review of the record, we conclude that the claims are unexhausted and that the district court did *158 not err in dismissing Brown’s claims on screening. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (b)(1)(A); Shumway v. Payne, 223 F.3d 982, 987 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.