Case law

Transbay Container Terminal v. United States Department Of Labor Benefits Review Board

141 F.3d 907 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1998

We therefore review the ALJ decision, as affirmed by the Board, as the Board decision. Jones Stevedoring Co. v. … The Board's factual findings are reviewed for substantial evidence. Sproull v.

Alessandro P. Nardella v. Campbell MacHine Inc. And Zenith National Insurance Company

525 F.2d 46 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 1975

Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Association, 390 U.S. 459, 467 , 88 S.Ct. 1140, 1145 , 20 L.Ed.2d 30 (1968); see O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). … We therefore affirm the decision of the Benefits Review Board.

United States v. Christopher Brown

452 F. App'x 738 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 5, 2011

No. 2:05-cr-00580-SMM v. MEMORANDUM * CHRISTOPHER AUGUSTINE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … Nevertheless, because the government forfeited the argument that Brown’s appeal is untimely, we may exercise jurisdiction over Brown’s claim. See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 940 (9th Cir. 2007).

Brian Brown v. Unknown Olivious

453 F. App'x 752 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 13, 2011

BROWN, No. 10-16541 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00336-JMR- PSOT v. … Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis, under the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), in his action under Bivens v.

Prudencio Chavez v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs United States Department of Labor Todd Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Todd Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Prudencio P. Chavez

961 F.2d 1409 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 1992

Brown ("Brown"), representing Armstrong, and Catherine Hunt Ruddy ("Ruddy"), representing Keene, into evidence. These declarations stated that Chavez's case had not been settled. … See United States v.

Consolidated Water Co. v. City of San Diego

93 F. 849 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 6, 1899

Dows, 18 Wall. 626 ; Bland v. Fleeman, 29 Fed. 669, 673 ; Water Co. v. Babcock, 76 Fed. 243 ; Mangels v. Brewing Co., 53 Fed. 513 ; Board v. Blair, 70 Fed. 414, 419 . … Prac. § 42; Gaylords v. Kelshaw, 1 Wall. 81 ; New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. City of New Orleans, 164 U. S. 471, 480 , 17 Sup. Ct. 161; Chadbourn v. Coe, 45 Fed. 822, 825 ; Gardner v. Brown, 21 Wall. 36, 40 ; Mallow v.

Patrick v. Burget

800 F.2d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 30, 1986

See Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350-51 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … See Brown v. Avemco Investment Co., 603 F.2d 1367, 1371 (9th Cir. 1979).

Sasetharan Arulampalam v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

399 F.3d 1087 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 2005

v. … Grivois v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 100, 101 (1994) (interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(B) to mean that “to timely ‘submit’ an EAJA application, it must be received by the. Court within 30 days of final judgment.”

Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary/Bartender Trust Fund v. Las Vegas Sands, Inc.

7 F. App'x 753 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 11, 2001

United States v. John Alfred Hamilton

490 F.2d 598 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 18, 1974

It is true that there were visible plywood boards over the compartment, but no witness suggested that a plywood flooring in a pick-up truck was unusual or suspicious. … Thus in Draper v.

Ashton Jones v. Board of Regents of the University and State Colleges of Arizona, Douglas Paxton

397 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 1968

PER CURIAM: Before us is an interlocutory appeal from the order of the district court denying appellant’s prayer, contained in his amended complaint, for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the members of the Board of … See Maas v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 251 , 371 F.2d 348 (1966); Dymo Industries, Inc. v. Tapeprinter, Inc., 326 F.2d 141 (9th Cir. 1964); B. W. Photo Utilities v.

Alexander v. County of Los Angeles

64 F.3d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 29, 1995

Thus, under clearly established law, the officers acted reasonably in ordering Alexander and Brown from their car at gunpoint. See United States v. … Handcuffing Alexander and Brown also was not necessarily unlawful under clearly established law. In United States v.

Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers, Mesa Verde Construction Company v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board

895 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 1990

The en banc panel adopted as the law of this circuit the decision of the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB or Board) in Deklewa v. … The Board's decision to apply Deklewa retroactively is not binding on this court. See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.

633 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 22, 1980

P 12,333 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. * WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: 1 The National Labor Relations Board ordered a multi-employer bargaining agent to furnish a complete roster of its members

Ellenberger v. Warren

199 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 3, 1952

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Wilson

178 F.2d 534 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 22, 1949

In its opinion the court cited with approval Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. … The situation of pre-existing disease dealt with in Browning v. Equitable Life Assur.

Olivo v. Duncan

317 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 9, 2009

See Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 , 104 S.Ct. 3315 , 82 L.Ed.2d 556 (1984). Second, appellant does not have a right to a racially segregated school environment. Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); see also United States v.

Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young

834 F.3d 975 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 2016

The Board’s reasonable interpretations of the NLRA command deference, while the Board’s remedial preferences and interpretations of unrelated statutes do not. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (quoting Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561, 569 , 115 S.Ct. 1061 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1 (1995)).

State of California State Board of Equalization v. Taxel (In re Del Mission Ltd.)

998 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 16, 1993

Taxel complained that EDD and the Board violated the automatic stay by demanding payment of unauthorized amounts. … EDD and the Board do not argue that California’s right to payment of prepetition taxes is secured.

Khor Chin Lim v. Board of Regents of University of California

76 F. App'x 177 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 22, 2003

We consider on our own motion whether an order dismissing a complaint is appealable, California v. Harvier, 700 F.2d 1217, 1218 (9th Cir.1983), and we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. … See Lopez v. City of Needles, 95 F.3d 20, 23 (9th Cir.1996). DISMISSED.