Case law

Molly Brown v. Madison Reed, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 13, 2023

McGinity v. Procter & Gamble Co., 69 F.4th 1093, 1099 (9th Cir. 2023). II The district court did not err in dismissing Brown’s claims. … (quoting Cook, Perkiss & Liehe v. N. Cal.

National Labor Relations Board v. United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipe Fitting Industry Of The United States And Canada, Local 675, Afl-Cio

427 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 1970

427 F.2d 341 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, LOCAL 675, AFL-CIO, Respondent. … Before JERTBERG, BROWNING, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

United States of America, and v. State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, And

694 F.2d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 1982

United States v. … Friends of the Earth v.

Timothy McIlwain, I v. James Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 2021

No. 2:18-cv-05275-DMG-SK v. JAMES NATHANIEL BROWN, AKA MEMORANDUM* Jim Brown, Defendant-Appellee. … R. 7-9 (setting forth deadline for opposition papers), 7-12 (providing that failure to timely oppose motion is ground for granting motion); Ghazali v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 340, Afl-Clo

301 F.2d 824 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 10, 1962

See Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 9 Cir., 284 F.2d 74, 83-84 . It is likewise true that, as a general proposition, to disprove a defense is not to prove the affirmative elements of a violation. … Broth. of Teamsters, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 365 U.S. 667 , 81 S.Ct. 835 , 6 L.Ed.2d 11 ; Radio Officers’ Union, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 347 U.S. 17, 42-43 , 74 S.Ct. 323 , 98 L.Ed. 455 . 2 .

Adams v. Clarke

22 F.2d 957 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 1927

C.) 265 F. 293 ; Bailey v. Babcock (D. C.) 241 F. 501 . See, also, Brown v. Allebach (C. C.) 156 F. 897 . … Curtis v. Connly, supra. But here, during the entire period in question, defendants not only held a majority of the capital stock, but constituted the entire board of directors.

Coronet-Western, a Division of Coronet Industries, Inc., and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

518 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 1975

In supervising election proceedings, the Board has a wide degree of discretion. The scope of our review, on the other hand, is limited. See, e. g., NLRB v. A. J. … See NLRB v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc., supra at 1130-31; cf. Thiem Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 489 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1973).

Steven Brown v. Department of Children Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 2023

Accordingly, Brown’s arrest did not violate clearly established federal law. Contrary to Brown’s argument, our decision in Beier v. … The cases Brown cites that involved social workers, including Wallis and Rogers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 12, Afl-Cio

323 F.2d 545 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 9, 1963

Broth, of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-men and Helpers of America v. N. L. R. B., 365 U.S. 667 , 81 S.Ct. 835 , 6 L.Ed.2d 11 (1961). … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464-465 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

United States v. Erminio Giustina and Irene O. Giustina, United States of America v. Anselmo Giustina and Josephine Giustina, United States of America v. Natale B. Giustina and Jacqueline Giustina, United States of America v. Ehrman v. Giustina and Marion Lee Giustina

313 F.2d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 1963

Before HAMLIN, JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. … Giustina v.

Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. H.F. Johnson, Inc.

830 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 16, 1987

Board of Trustees Etc. v. H.F. Johnson, 606 F.Supp. 231 (W.D.Wash.1985). H.F. Johnson is not a party to this appeal. … See, e.g., 29 U.S.C. § 160 (6 month period of limitations applies to unfair labor practice actions brought by National Labor Relations Board); Herget v.

In Re Geothermal Resources International, Inc., Debtor. Thomas I. Hamilton v. Thomas E. Lumsden, Chapter 11 Trustee of Geothermal Resources Int'l, Inc. New East Mesa Limited Partnership Geo East Mesa, Inc. Geo Science (Usa) Inc., in Re Geothermal Resources International, Inc., Debtor. Thomas I. Hamilton, and Ronald P. Baldwin v. Thomas E. Lumsden, Chapter 11 Trustee of Geothermal Resources Int'l, Inc. New East Mesa Limited Partnership Geo East Mesa, Inc. Geo Science (Usa) Inc.

93 F.3d 648 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 1996

See Mueller v. MacBan, 62 Cal.App.3d 258, 276 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 222 (1976). … Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1268 , 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 153 , (1994), quoting Mitchell v.

Clovis Unified School District v. California Office of Administrative Hearings

903 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1990

Similarly, in Board of Education v. … In Jefferson County Board of Education v.

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. California State Board Of Equalization

102 F.3d 425 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 1996

See Vernon v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir.1987) (internal quotations and citations omitted); see also Browder v. … See Taragan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 838 F.2d 1337, 1340-41 (D.C.Cir.1988); IBM Corp. v. Edelstein, 526 F.2d 37 , 47 (2d Cir.1975); Alger v. Hayes, 452 F.2d 841, 843 (8th Cir.1972).

Webster v. Board of Trustees of School Dist. No. 25, Bannock County, Pocatello, Idaho

774 F.2d 1176 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 24, 1985

774 F.2d 1176 Webster v. Board of Trustees of School Dist. No. 25, Bannock County, Pocatello, Idaho 84-3732 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 9/24/85 D.Idaho AFFIRMED

Transbay Container Terminal v. United States Department Of Labor Benefits Review Board

141 F.3d 907 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1998

We therefore review the ALJ decision, as affirmed by the Board, as the Board decision. Jones Stevedoring Co. v. … The Board's factual findings are reviewed for substantial evidence. Sproull v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Joseph C. Asher, D/B/A the Meat Cleaver

492 F.2d 1189 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 21, 1974

OPINION PER CURIAM: The petitioning Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 200 NLRB No. 130 . … We are not persuaded that the Board’s critical factual determinations were not supported by substantial evidence; therefore, its Order will be Enforced.

Alessandro P. Nardella v. Campbell MacHine Inc. And Zenith National Insurance Company

525 F.2d 46 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 1975

Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Association, 390 U.S. 459, 467 , 88 S.Ct. 1140, 1145 , 20 L.Ed.2d 30 (1968); see O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). … We therefore affirm the decision of the Benefits Review Board.

Horizon Christian School v. Kate Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 2, 2021

No. 3:20-cv-01345-MO Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEMORANDUM* KATE BROWN, Governor, State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellee. … Brown’s announcement of a change in policy, Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that they “‘remain[ed] under a constant threat’ that [Gov. Brown] will use [her] power to reinstate the challenged restrictions.” Tandon v.

United States v. Christopher Brown

452 F. App'x 738 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 5, 2011

No. 2:05-cr-00580-SMM v. MEMORANDUM * CHRISTOPHER AUGUSTINE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … Nevertheless, because the government forfeited the argument that Brown’s appeal is untimely, we may exercise jurisdiction over Brown’s claim. See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 940 (9th Cir. 2007).