Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local 11, Afl-Cio

772 F.2d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 24, 1985

P 11,594 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and Steven R. Loveall, Vincent J. Sokol and William G. Mott, Petitioners-Intervenors, v. … This court's review of the Board's deferral decision is limited to determining whether the Board has abused its discretion. Servair, 726 F.2d at 1438-39 ; Hawaiian Hauling Service, Ltd. v.

Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of Education

552 F.2d 1326 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1977

Hines v. Rapides Parish School Board, 479 F.2d 762, 765 (5th Cir. 1973). … Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 427 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1970).

Eric Brown v. Matthew Cate

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2020

Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. … See Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 735 (2011) (explaining two-part test for qualified immunity); Hines v.

Pacific Northwest Chapter of the Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

699 F.2d 488 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1983

Pursuant to the decision and remand by the Supreme Court of the United States in this case, Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. NLRB, 456 U.S. 645 , 102 S.Ct. 2071 , 72 L.Ed.2d 398 (1982), it is ORDERED: 1. … The orders of the Board are enforced in their entirety. Judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 29 of this Court.

Eldon C. Hart v. John L. McLucas Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, and National Transportation Safety Board

535 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1976

Jay v. Boyd, 351 U.S. 345, 360-61 , 76 S.Ct. 919, 928 , 100 L.Ed. 1242, 1255 (1956); Klein v. Republic Steel Corp., 435 F.2d 762, 766 (3d Cir. 1970); Rucker v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 205 F.2d 449, 450 (9th Cir. 1953).

Brian Brown v. Barbara Von Blanckensee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 2021

BROWN, No. 20-15748 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00436-RCC-LCK v. … Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Alaimalo v.

Employment Development Department v. United States Postal Service, Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal Service

698 F.2d 1029 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 10, 1983

It relies upon United States v. … The Franchise Tax Board In Mid-1978, the Franchise Tax Board (the Board) issued four “orders to withhold” to the Postal Service under Cal.Rev. & Tax.

Alan J. Mishler, M.D. v. Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners Robert C. Clift, M.D.

896 F.2d 408 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 16, 1990

Haygood v. Younger, 769 F.2d 1350, 1356 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Cranke v. Haygood, 478 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 3333 , 92 L.Ed.2d 739 (1986) (citing Mathews v. … See Ostlund v. Bobb, 825 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied 486 U.S. 1033 , 108 S.Ct. 2016 , 100 L.Ed.2d 603 (1988); Private Investigator’s Licensing *411 Bd. v.

Board of Trustees of Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Thompson Bldg. Materials, Inc.

749 F.2d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 1984

749 F.2d 1396 6 Employee Benefits Ca 1233 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the WESTERN CONFERENCE OF TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. … In United States v.

Gerald L. Stone v. United States

358 F.2d 503 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 11, 1966

BROWNING, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 without a hearing. We reverse. … Krupnick v.

Thomas B. Sawyer v. County of Sonoma and Retirement Board of the County of Sonoma, Defendants

719 F.2d 1001 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 1, 1983

Brown v. Solano County Business Development, 92 Cal. App.3d 192, 196 , 154 Cal.Rptr. 700, 702 (1979) (court holds that doctrine inapplicable in situation where the purpose of the requirements would be defeated). … In Adler v.

Raul Morales-Izquierdo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

388 F.3d 1299 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 18, 2004

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). … See Lattab v. Ashcroft, 384 F.3d 8, 19 (1st Cir.2004).

Lindahl King v. Saddleback Junior College District

425 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 1970

See, e. g., Davis v. Firment, 269 F.Supp. 524 (E.D.La.1967): Zachry v. Brown, 299 F.Supp. 1360 (N.D.Ala. 1969); Griffin v. Tatum, 300 F.Supp. 60 (M.D.Ala.1969); Crews v. … Rossi, 305 F.Supp. 706 (D.Minn.1969); Brick v. Board, 305 F.Supp. 1316 (D.Colo.1969); Sims v. Colfax Community School Dist., 307 F.Supp. 485 (S.D.Iowa 1969); Neuhaus v. Torrey, 310 F.Supp. 192 (N.D.Cal.1970).

Debra J. Grunwald Lewis N. Adams Vicki S. Burdeaux Maria Buselle v. San Bernardino City Unified School District Shelby Obershaw, President, Sbcusd Hardy L. Brown, Vice President, Sbcusd Elisa Diaz, School Board Member San Bernardino Teachers Association, Cta/nea, Debra J. Grunwald Lewis N. Adams Vicki S. Burdeaux Maria Buselle v. San Bernardino City Unified School District Shelby Obershaw, President, Sbcusd Hardy L. Brown, Vice President, Sbcusd Elisa Diaz, School Board Member San Bernardino Teachers Association, Cta/nea

994 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1993

Brown, Vice President, SBCUSD; Elisa Diaz, School Board Member, et al.; San Bernardino Teachers Association, CTA/NEA, Defendants-Appellees. Debra J. GRUNWALD; Lewis N. Adams; Vicki S. … This is like the District refusing to follow Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 501, Afl-Cio

806 F.2d 1405 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 1986

DISCUSSION An NLRB order will be enforced if the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and if the Board correctly applied the law. NLRB v. IBEW Local 46, 793 F.2d 1026, 1028 (9th Cir.1986). … .); Railway Mail Association v.

Benjamin Flournoy, Jr. v. Larry Small

681 F.3d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 30, 2012

 3:08-cv-02298- BROWN, Jr., Attorney General; IEG-POR MATHEW CATE, Secretary CDCR, OPINION Respondents-Appellees. … FLOURNOY v.

Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

124 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 29, 1941

Commissioner v. Babson, 7 Cir., 70 F.2d 304, 306 ; Randolph v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 76 F.2d 472, 476 ; Commissioner v. Champion, 6 Cir., 78 F.2d 513, 514 ; Brown v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 73, 74 . … The petitioner urges that the decision of the Board in Bona Allen v.

Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-Massengale

781 F.2d 1349 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 30, 1986

See Champion International Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406, 1407-08 (9th Cir.1984); Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, 463 U.S. 86 , 96 n. 14, 103 5.Ct. 2890, 2899 n. 14, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983). III. … See Champion International Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406 (9th Cir.1984) (Montana did not have vital state interest in enforcing age discrimination laws).

Sombat Kamheangpatiyooth v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

597 F.2d 1253 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 30, 1979

The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed petitioner’s appeal, stating simply, “[t]he decision of the immigration judge was correct,” citing Munoz-Casarez v. … The principal case on which the Immigration judge and the Board relied, Munoz-Casarez v. INS, 511 F.2d 947 (9th Cir. 1975), is distinguishable.

James Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department

203 F.3d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 2000

TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, a combined City County Health Department; its ORDER Board of Health; TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH; FEDERICO CRUZ-URIBE, Director of Health for the Tacoma-Pierce County Health … Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/ American Express, 490 U.S. 477, 484 (1989); see also Agostini v.