Case law

Lawrence S. Wagle v. H. Max Murray, as Principal of the R. A. Long High School

546 F.2d 1329 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 19, 1977

BROWNING, Circuit Judge. Appellant brought this action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , against the principal of R. A. … See Pickering v. *1336 Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 572-73 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Schroder v. Volcker

864 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 1988

Paul VOLCKER, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Denver Branch; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Silas Keehn, President, Federal Reserve … Brown v. Reardon, 770 F.2d 896, 907 (10th Cir.1985); see also Moor v.

Barroga v. Board of Administration of the California Employees' Retirement System

235 F. App'x 414 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 2007

Co. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1192 (9th Cir.1997). We review for an abuse of discretion the imposition of a pre-filing review order. De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.1990).

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, Western Division v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, Western Division

52 F.3d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 11, 1995

P 11,311 LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, WESTERN DIVISION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 88 , 63 S.Ct. 454, 459 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943); County of Los Angeles v. Sullivan, 969 F.2d 735, 740 (9th Cir.1992) 4 For example, the ALJ wrote: ..

A. N. Decker v. North Idaho College

552 F.2d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 1977

BROWNING, Chief Judge, dissenting: 15 The district court found appellees violated appellant's due process rights by denying him a pretermination hearing. See Board of Education v. … Minnesota State Junior College Board, 487 F.2d 153, 157 (8th Cir. 1973); see Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 545, 546 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Greene v.

Pacific Northwest Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

654 F.2d 1301 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 17, 1981

Woelke petitions for review of the Board’s order, and the Board seeks enforcement. 6 Both decisions of the Board were reviewed by a panel of this court. 609 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1979). … Despite the General Counsel’s action, the Taft-Hartley Act was virtually ignored within the construction industry until the Board decided United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry (Brown-Olds

Lipman, Wolfe & Co. v. Phœnix Assur. Co.

258 F. 544 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 26, 1919

Sea Board Air Line, 63 Fla. 122 , 58 South. 182 ; Knight v. Forbes, 19 Ga. App. 320 , 91 S. … W. 997 ; Baldwin v. Hutchison, 8 Ind. App. 454 , 35 N. E. 711 ; Brown v. Worthington, 162 Mo. App. 508 , 142 S. W. 1082 ; Rees v. Schmits, 164 Ill. App. 251 ; Sartwell v. Horton, 28 Vt. 370 ; Parmentier v.

Anglo Canadian Shipping Company, Ltd. v. United States of America and Federal Maritime Board

264 F.2d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1959

Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co., 356 U.S. 481 , 78 S.Ct. 851 , 2 L.Ed.2d 926 . … This provision is referred to by the Supreme Court in Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen, supra, at 486. We understand Isbrandtsen Co. v.

Manuel Valencia v. Loretta E. Lynch

811 F.3d 1211 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 2, 2016

FDA v. Brown &Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132–33 (2000). … VALENCIA V.

Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board Of Education Of The Anchorage School District

952 F.2d 1173 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 3, 1992

Big Country Foods v. Board of Education, 868 F.2d 1085 (9th Cir.1989). The district court then granted summary judgment for the federal defendants and dismissed all claims against all defendants. Big Country appeals. … Window Co. v.

Sahara Datsun, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

811 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1987

Here, the Board invoked the rule against relitigation and declined to hear evidence on the LWW’s status as a labor organization. In Magnesium Casting Co. v. … In some instances, however, the Board will require an employer to recognize and bargain with a union which has never achieved a majority in a Board election. In NLRB v.

Estate of Bruce Barton v. Adt Security Services Pension

820 F.3d 1060 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2016

See, e.g., Nigro v. … See It’s Your First Kiss, Charlie Brown (CBS television broadcast Oct. 24,1977).

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, & Locals 6, 10, 34, 54 & 91

378 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 15, 1967

The Board, in order to effectuate its determination of the underlying work assignment, seeks enforcement of its order. In N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Local 991, International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO, 332 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1964); N. L. R. B. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, 326 F.2d 213 (3rd Cir. 1964).

Christopher Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc.

909 F.3d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 2018

See Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744, 1752 (2017) (explaining that “an unregistered trademark can be enforced against would-be infringers” under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)); Brown v. Elec. … Brown v. 20 GORDON V. DRAPE CREATIVE Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).

Benda v. Grand Lodge of the International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

584 F.2d 308 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 1978

No different is Executive Board Local 1302 v. … Gordon, supra, distinguished Brown as not involving collective bargaining, the crucial element which legitimized the trusteeship in Gordon .

Raymond L. Reese v. United States Board of Parole, and J. Pat Madrid, United States Marshal, Richard Arthur Marine v. Maurice H. Sigler, Chairman, United States Board of Parole, Jerry Lee Miller v. United States Board of Parole and Warden, U.S.P., McNeil Island

530 F.2d 231 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1976

REESE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, and J. Pat Madrid, United States Marshal, Respondents-Appellees. Richard Arthur MARINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Maurice H. … Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270 (D.D.C.1973), considers a factual situation similar to Marine v.

Jack Ybarra, Also Known as Isaias M. Ybarra, Individually and as President of the Confederacion De La Raza Unida v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation v. McCarthy

503 F.2d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 16, 1974

Before KOELSCH, BROWNING, and CHOY, Circuit Judges. … Oxnard School District Board of Trustees, 488 F.2d 579, 586 (9th Cir. 1973), we indicated that one of the several elements to be considered by the district court on remand in connection with whether the school board had engaged

Krause v. Sacramento Inn

479 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 1973

See id.; Toymenka, Inc. v. Mount Hope Finishing Co., 432 F.2d 722 , 727 n. 10 (4th Cir. 1970); Wratehford v. S. J. Groves & *990 Sons Co., 405 F.2d 1061, 1063 (4th Cir. 1969); Green v. … Brown, 398 F.2d 1006, 1009 (2d Cir. 1968); New York, N. H. & H. R. R. v. Reconstruction Finance Co., 180 F.2d 241, 244 (2d Cir. 1950) (L. Hand, J.).

Florin Dente v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Local 90, Anunincorporated Labor Organization

492 F.2d 10 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 1974

See, e. g., Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330, 337 , 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 (1953); Vaca v. Sipes, supra, 386 U.S. at 177 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 ; Retana v. … The collective bargaining agreement only required the Licensed Personnel Board to meet promptly to consider grievances; no provision of the agreement imposed a duty upon the union to present grievances promptly to the Board

Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP

734 F.3d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 2013

But see Brown v. Citicorp Credit Servs., No. 1:12-cv-00062-BLW, 2013 WL 645942, at *3 (D. Idaho Feb. 21, 2013) (deferring to NLRB’s decision in D.R. Horton under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. … Mar. 16, 2012) (finding “the Board’s interpretation of the NLRA in D.R.