Case law

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

834 F.2d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 16, 1987

In NLRB v. … Motors v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local No. 8, Afl-Cio

465 F.2d 974 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 1972

Accordingly, the Examiner, and the Board, concluded that the Union had violated section 8(b) (3) of the Act by failing to execute the collective bargaining agreement. See N.L.R.B. v. Ralph Printing & Litho. … However, compliance with a Board order does not necessarily render the case moot. N.L.R.B. v. Raytheon Co., 398 U.S. 25, 26-28 , 90 S.Ct. 1547 , 26 L.Ed.2d 21 (1970); N.L.R.B. v.

United States v. Gustavo Alvarado, United States of America v. Oscar Oqueli-Hernandez

817 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 18, 1987

See United States v. … See United States v. White, 794 F.2d 367, 371 (8th Cir.1986); United States v. Nordstrom, 730 F.2d 556, 557 (8th Cir.1984). Cf . United States v.

Pacific Northwest Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

654 F.2d 1301 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 17, 1981

Woelke petitions for review of the Board’s order, and the Board seeks enforcement. 6 Both decisions of the Board were reviewed by a panel of this court. 609 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1979). … Despite the General Counsel’s action, the Taft-Hartley Act was virtually ignored within the construction industry until the Board decided United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry (Brown-Olds

Sean David Sengenberger v. Ralph Townsend, President, Idaho Board of Corrections, State of Idaho

473 F.3d 914 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 2006

Stanley v. Univ. of So. Calif., 178 F.3d 1069, 1079 (9th Cir.1999). “Indigency is a factor that the district court may properly consider in deciding whether to award costs.” Id.

Woodfeathers, Inc. v. Washington County

180 F.3d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1999

Brown, 731 F.2d 1406, 1408 (9th Cir.1984); and where the federal regulatory jurisdiction of the employees in a bargaining unit had previously been determined. See Bud Antle, Inc. v. … See Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 529 F.Supp. 287, 289 (N.D.Ala.1981) (“Congress conspicuously omitted a definition of ‘property’ from the Interstate Commerce Act.”).

Sahara Datsun, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

811 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1987

Here, the Board invoked the rule against relitigation and declined to hear evidence on the LWW’s status as a labor organization. In Magnesium Casting Co. v. … In some instances, however, the Board will require an employer to recognize and bargain with a union which has never achieved a majority in a Board election. In NLRB v.

Ruby v. United States

341 F.2d 585 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 1965

Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. 3 Before POPE and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District judge. 4 THOMPSON, District Judge. 5 This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying Appellant's petition … The petition alleges that on December 15, 1931, the Secretary of the Navy issued an undesirable discharge from service with respect to petitioner without investigation, board hearing or court martial.

Claude Brown v. King County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 11, 2020

Reynaga v. Roseburg Forest Prods., 847 F.3d 678, 691 (9th Cir. 2017). … a “substantial factor” in the adverse action, Allison v.

Compagnie Maritime Francaise v. Meyer

248 F. 881 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 4, 1918

Justice Brown, referring to the Harter Act said: “By the third section of that act [Comp. … Justice Brown in the Chattahoochee Case was relied upon in The Wildcroft, 130 Fed. 521 , 65 C. C.

Tricou v. Helvering

68 F.2d 280 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 18, 1933

R. 1277; Brown v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 797 . In Burr v. Des Moines Co., 68 U. S. (1 Wall.) 99, 102 , 17 L. … We are confirmed in this view by the two decisions of the Supreme Court rendered after the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, Burnet v. Clark, 287 U. S. 410 , 53 S. Ct. 207 , 77 L. Ed. 397 ; Burnet v.

Iron Workers District Council of the Pacific Northwest v. National Labor Relations Board

913 F.2d 1470 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 13, 1990

Co. v. Building & Constr. … The Board’s resolution of this factual question will be upheld on appeal if substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings of fact and if the Board has correctly applied the law. NLRB v. Howard Elec.

Krause v. Sacramento Inn

479 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 1973

See id.; Toymenka, Inc. v. Mount Hope Finishing Co., 432 F.2d 722 , 727 n. 10 (4th Cir. 1970); Wratehford v. S. J. Groves & *990 Sons Co., 405 F.2d 1061, 1063 (4th Cir. 1969); Green v. … Brown, 398 F.2d 1006, 1009 (2d Cir. 1968); New York, N. H. & H. R. R. v. Reconstruction Finance Co., 180 F.2d 241, 244 (2d Cir. 1950) (L. Hand, J.).

Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson

353 F.3d 824 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 2, 2004

See Carson Harbor Village Ltd. v. … Legal Found. v. Legal Found. of Wash., 271 F.3d 835, 851 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), aff'd by Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003).

Defenders of Wildlife Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. Mike Bernal Robert Smith, Dr.,superintendent Board

204 F.3d 920 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 2000

See Browning-Ferns Indus. of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 278 , 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989); Scott v. Ross, 140 F.3d 1275, 1281 (9th Cir.1998). … See Gould v. Mutual Life Ins.

In Re: Harry H. Mitchell

209 F.3d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2000

MITCHELL, OPINION Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD,STATE OF CALIFORNIA;BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Appellees. … Browning and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges, and Samuel P. King, * District Judge.

Barker v. Board of Prison Terms

389 F. App'x 650 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 2010

CV-03-06100-AWI v. MEMORANDUM * BOARD OF PRISON TERMS; et al., Respondents - Appellees. … The state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence supports the Board’s decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 562-63, 569 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc).

Bowen v. Needles Nat. Bank

94 F. 925 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 15, 1899

And the court quoted with approval from the opinion in State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens’ St. Ry. … .” *930 In Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487 , 1 Sup.

United States v. Everett Monte Cristo Hotel, Inc.

524 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 1, 1975

Brown further testified that at least some of these discussions involved several people, though his testimony left unclear whether there was a formal board meeting on the subject. … They, too, are liable to Veca for Brown's acts within the scope of his authority. 1 (Restatement (Second) Agency, Supra, § 186; Cf. Matsko v.

Dwight-Eubank Rambler, Inc., D/B/A Al Ortale Rambler v. National Labor Relations Board

380 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 1967

See Killian v. United States, 368 U.S. 231, 239-243 , 82 S.Ct. 302 , 7 L.Ed.2d 256 ; N.L.R.B. v. Seine and Line Fishermen’s Union of San Pedro, 9 Cir., 374 F.2d 974 , decided January 6, 1967. … Section 102.118 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.118 (1964); Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated) v. N.L. R.B., 9 Cir., 335 F.2d 749, 753 ; Ra-Rich Mfg. Corp., 121 N.L.R.B. 700 . 4 .