Case law

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

858 F.2d 576 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 1988

ANALYSIS Decisions of the NLRB will be upheld if the Board correctly applied the law and if its factual findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. NLRB v. … See Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB, 441 U.S. 488, 497 , 99 S.Ct. 1842, 1849 , 60 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979). The Board found that the July 20 poll was an unfair labor practice, violative of section 8(a)(1).

Community Builders, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal Corporation, and the City of Scottsdale, a Municipal Corporation

652 F.2d 823 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 1981

E. g., McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, 444 U.S. 232 , 100 S.Ct. 502 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980). … See California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 , 100 S.Ct. 937 , 63 L.Ed.2d 233 (1980); New Motor Vehicle Board v. Orrin W.

Brown Jordan International Inc v. Dale Boles

375 F. App'x 700 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 13, 2010

Boles’ request for fees followed the district court’s order denying a motion to reopen that had been filed by Brown Jordan International, Inc. (“BJI”). … Towers of Wash. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 12, International Union of Operating Engineers

673 F.2d 1094 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1982

The Board has discretion to determine what complaints shall be filed in an unfair labor practice proceeding. Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171,182 , 87 S.Ct. 903, 912 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Pacific Southwest Airlines v. … Thus an NLRB decision cannot consider anything except the charges in the complaint filed by General Counsel for the Labor Board. See, General Teamsters Local 162 v. NLRB, 568 F.2d 665 , 669 (9th Cir. 1978); Frito Co. v.

King County v. Rasmussen

299 F.3d 1077 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 9, 2002

Veach v. Culp, 92 Wash.2d 570 , 599 P.2d 526, 527 (Wash.1979). The intent of the parties is of paramount importance in determining what interest the deed conveyed. Brown v. … King County v. Hanson Inv. Co., 34 Wash.2d 112 , 208 P.2d 113, 119 (1949) (cited in Brown, 924 P.2d at 912 ).

Perkins v. Marine Terminals Corp.

673 F.2d 1097 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1982

As the Board noted in Lasky v. … Accord, Stockman v. John T. Clark & Son of Boston, Inc., 539 F.2d 264 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 908 , 97 S.Ct. 2972 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1092 (1977); Brown v. Reynolds Shipyard, 9 BRBS 614 (1979); Nalej v. H. W.

Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School District

714 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1983

See Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Brown, 651 F.2d 613, 615 (9th Cir.1980). … Brown, Jr., who were named as parties when this suit was brought.

Financial Institution Employees of America, Local No. 1182 v. National Labor Relations Board

738 F.2d 1038 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 24, 1984

Corp. v. … The Board also noted that “the eontemporaneous understanding of the parties supports a finding of impasse.” The Board relies on NLRB v.

Local No. 3-193 International Woodworkers of America v. Ketchikan Pulp Company

611 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 1980

In the words of Judge Browning (Bartenders & Culinary Workers Union Local 340 v. Howard Johnson Co., 535 F.2d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1976)), “There is no incisive response, in purely conceptual terms, to this argument.” … “Board policy has been to deny efficacy to such clauses, and this court has explicitly approved this policy. E. g., Sheraton-Kauai Corp. v. NLRB, 429 F.2d 1352 (CA 9 1970).

Royal Development Co., Ltd., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

703 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 1983

II We must enforce the Board’s order if the Board correctly applied the law and if the Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence in the record viewed as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v. … Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. NLRB, 565 F.2d 1074, 1078-79 (9th Cir. 1977). She did not act unreasonably in admitting the page of the affidavit. 7 . The Board also cites NLRB v.

Sohio Petroleum Co., a Division of Sohio Natural Resources Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

625 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 1980

Beck Corp. v. NLRB, 590 F.2d 290 , 293 (9th Cir. 1978); see also NLRB v. Don Burgess Const. Corp., 596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979). … NLRB v. Local 588, Retail Clerks International Ass’n, 587 F.2d 984 (9th Cir. 1978).

Cecile Brown v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 16, 2020

No. 3:20-cv-05640-RSM v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Board of Veteran Appeals, Defendant-Appellee. … The district court properly dismissed Brown’s action because Brown failed to allege facts sufficient to state a claim and her request for damages was frivolous. See Hebbe v.

United States v. Charles Keith Hardman

439 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1971

Accord, Straight v. United States (9 Cir. 1969) 413 F.2d 263 ; Brown v. United States (9 Cir. 1969) 409 F.2d 1354 . … Thus, the board was not required to reclassify appellant. See, United States v. Blakely (9 Cir. 1970) 424 F.2d 1043 ; Straight v. United States (9 Cir. 1969). 413 F.2d 263, 264 ; Blades v.

United States v. Litton Industries, Inc.

462 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 28, 1972

See Genuine Parts Co. v. F.T.C., supra; F.T.C. v. Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292 , 435 F.2d 96 (1970). See also United States v. Newman, 441 F.2d 165, 169 (5th Cir. 1971). … Since the courts do not presume administrative irregularity, National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Robert E. Brown

142 F.3d 446 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 24, 1998

Evidence of Brown's flight was probative of his consciousness of guilt and of his possession of the cocaine, see United States v. … Because Brown did not properly object to the delay, we review for plain error, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); United States v.

Paul A. Staael v. Samuel Trivette, Executive Director, Alaska Parole Board

5 F.3d 540 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 26, 1993

State v. … Thomas v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Bay Counties District Council Of Carpenters, Afl-Cio

382 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 21, 1967

382 F.2d 593 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BAY COUNTIES DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, AFL-CIO, and its Agent C. R.Bartalini, Carpenters Union Local No. 162, AFL-CIO, and its Agent, E. … See Lane-Coos-Curry-Douglas Counties Building & Construction Trades Council and Willamette General Contractors Association, Case No. 36-CC-130, 155 NLRB 1115 , enforced in National Labor Relations Board v.

Mary Frudden v. Kayann Pilling

742 F.3d 1199 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 2014

The compelled speech doctrine was articulated by the United States Supreme Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624. … In considering the exemption at issue, we find Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), instructive.

Spring City Knitting Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Intervenor

647 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 13, 1981

The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of the order. We affirm and enforce the Board’s order. I. … The Board enjoys a wide discretion in conducting and supervising representation elections. Summa Corp., v. N.L.R.B., 625 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1980); N.L.R.B. v. Masonic Homes of California, 624 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1980).

Nancy E. Sutherland and Donald Sutherland and Stephen Newnham, Trustees of the Ralph L. Evans Trust v. Kaonohi Ohana, Ltd., Kaonohi Ohana, Ltd. v. Nancy E. Sutherland

776 F.2d 1425 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 22, 1985

Brown, vice-president of appellee, acting for appellee corporation's board of directors, agreed to sell the parcel of land to appellants for $1.4 million. … On June 12, Brown informed appellants that at the request of Ferreira's creditors he had accepted the new offer on behalf of appellee's board of directors. 3 Appellants, viewing Brown's actions as an anticipatory repudiation