Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Valley Health System, LLC Dba Desert Springs Hospital Medical Cent

93 F.4th 1115 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 2024

NLRB V. … NLRB V.

Barrymore v. Kemp

69 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 16, 1934

Ch. 93 , 107 A. 453 ; State v. Scarpaci, 86 Mo. App. 301 ; Grohmann v. Brown, 68 Mo. App. 630 ; Bottle v. Republic Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 71 N. J. Eq. 613, 64 A. 176 ; Cook v. Equitable Bldg. & L. Ass’n, 104 Ga. 814 , 30 S. … E. 911 ; Cashen v. Southern Mutual Bldg. & L. Ass’n, 114 Ga. 983 , 41 S. E. 51 ; Parker v. Heald, 29 App. D. C. 35. Decrees affirmed..

National Labor Relations Board v. George Joseph Orchard Siding, Inc.

123 F. App'x 746 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 2004

We have jurisdiction over the Board’s enforcement application under 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). We uphold a decision of the Board that correctly applies the law, if substantial evidence supports its findings of fact. NLRB v. … Underwriters Labs., Inc. v. NLRB, 147 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir.1998). Orchard challenges the Board’s acceptance of the ALJ’s credibility determinations.

National Labor Relations Board v. Randall P. Kane, Inc., D/B/A the Catalyst

581 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 1978

DISCUSSION The general standard of review of Board decisions is clear. If the Board’s decision rests on findings of fact for-which there is substantial evidence in the record, we must affirm. Universal Camera Corp. v. … In NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1547, Afl-Cio

971 F.2d 1435 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 11, 1992

See, e.g., Local Union 60 v. … Substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination.

The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company v. National Labor Relations Board, (Two Cases) National Labor Relations Board v. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, (Two Cases)

711 F.2d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 1983

P 10,296 The PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. (Two cases) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Cross-Petitioner, v. … On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of Decisions and Orders of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, MERRILL and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.

National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. And Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co. v. Emma J. (Evans) Bonner and U. S. Dept. Of Labor

600 F.2d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 17, 1979

Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951)) and in its role as interpreter of the Act (see Smith v. Califano, 597 F.2d 152 at 156 (9th Cir., 1979); Hart v. … In Oho v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Food Employers Council, Inc., and Retail Clerks Union, Local 770

399 F.2d 501 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 1968

, see NLRB v. … Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 v. NLRB, 370 F.2d 205 (9th Cir. 1966). It is not clear that in deciding such cases the Board has been entirely consistent, see Melody Music, Inc. v.

John Reichard v. Russell Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 2020

No. 2:19-cv-02010-DJH Appellants, v. MEMORANDUM* RUSSELL A. BROWN, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee. … ABS Ent., Inc. v. CBS Corp., 908 F.3d 405, 427 (9th Cir. 2018).

Uptegrove v. United States

600 F.2d 1248 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 21, 1979

In Archer v. … See Herreman v. United States, 476 F.2d 234 (7th Cir. 1973); Homlitas v. United States, 202 F.Supp. 520 (D.Or.1962); Fass v. United States, 191 F.Supp. 367 (E.D.N.Y.1961).

California ex rel. State Water Resources Control Board v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

966 F.2d 1541 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 1992

FERC’s reexamination led it to conclude that a 7 cfs minimum flow would significantly improve both juvenile and adult habitat . for brown and rainbow trout, and would increase adult habitat for brown trout by 14 percent and … In Steamboaters v.

Don Brown v. Kenneth Clark

477 F. App'x 430 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 2012

testify that he had heard that Brown had been beaten up by a rival gang member a month before the shooting violated Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). … We agree with the district court that Brown is not entitled to federal habeas relief because any error in admitting the challenged testimony was harmless. See Jackson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Vista Hill Foundation, D/B/A Vista Hill Hospital

639 F.2d 479 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 1981

[T]o the extent that the Board’s decision rests on findings of fact for which there is ‘substantial evidence’ on the record as a whole, this court must defer to that decision. NLRB v. … Kaiser Engineers v. *484 NLRB, 538 F.2d 1379, 1383-84 (9th Cir. 1976). Likewise, in NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. December 12, Inc., December 12, Inc., of Nevada

838 F.2d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 1988

838 F.2d 474 National Labor Relations Board v. December 12, Inc., December 12, Inc., of Nevada NO. 87-7099 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. JAN 21, 1988 1 Appeal From: N.L.R.B. 2 ORDER ENFORCED.

Alexander Dawson, Inc., D/B/A Alexander's Restaurant and Lounge v. National Labor Relations Board

586 F.2d 1300 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 1978

Carbo v. United States, supra, 314 F.2d at 743 . Accord, United States v. Scully, supra, 546 F.2d at 269 . … We find that the issue of surveillance was fully and fairly tried and that the Board did not err in finding this additional violation. As in Free-Flow Packaging Corp. v.

Brown v. City and County of San Francisco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 2026

BROWN, No. 26-563 D.C. No. 3:25-cv-06667-WHO Plaintiff - Appellant, v. … Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Brown’s action as barred by Heck v.

Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of Equalization

697 F.2d 860 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 25, 1983

Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan, 27 Cal.3d 855 , 616 P.2d 802 , 167 Cal.Rptr. 820 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 1362 , 67 L.Ed.2d 344 (1981). … Citing Erie Railroad v.

Tanforan Park Food Purveyors Council and the Hapsmith Company v. National Labor Relations Board

656 F.2d 1358 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 1981

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: Two corporations appeal a bargaining order of the National Labor Relations Board *1360 (“NLRB”). … Given the duty of the Board to protect its own procedures, and to present comprehensible election notices to employees, we hold that the Board was in error in denying an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the Samoan translation

Institute of Cetacean v. Sea Shepard

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 19, 2014

Thereafter, Watson submitted his resignation from the Sea Shepherd Australia board and Brown became a member. … On December 31, 2012, the Sea Shepherd Australia board resolved that Brown and Hansen would be the new leaders of OZT.

Veterans for Common Sense v. Shinseki

678 F.3d 1013 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 2012

Circuit, we find a closely analogous case in the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Beamon v. Brown. … Veterans, 962 F.2d at 141 (same); Dacoron v. Brown, 4 VetApp. 115, 119 (1993). The Eighth Circuit appears to have taken a different view.