Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.42s
National Labor Relations Board v. Morris P. Kirk & Son, Inc.
154 F.2d 110 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 2, 1946
. §§ 158 (1-3, 5), 159(a, b), warranting the conclusion of a general intent to violate all its provisions, and that the Board properly overruled the respondents’ exceptions to the recommendations of the trial examiner for … Cf. our opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. Sun Tent-Luebbert Co., 9 Cir., 154 F.2d 108 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerica West Airlines, Inc. Edward R. Beauvais Michael J. Conway v. National Mediation Board
986 F.2d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1993
As a result, “[¡judicial review of [Board] decisions is extraordinarily limited.” Professional Cabin Crew Ass’n v. … Mechanics Fraternal Ass’n v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedAssociated General Contractors of California v. San Francisco Unified School District
616 F.2d 1381 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 11, 1980
Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II); United States v. … Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968).
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoating Industry Associations v. Marshall
601 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 13, 1979
Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra, 99 S.Ct. at 1723-24 . Notice No. 21 is not a regulation issued under congressional mandate in assistance of the OWCP's regulatory powers. … The Supreme Court recognizes that "a court is not required to give effect to an interpretive regulation," Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra, 99 S.Ct. at 1724 ; Batterton v.
Cited 7 timesPublished73 F.3d 368 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 1995
FLEMMING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD; Marva Claudette Fabien, Oregon Parole Board; Vern L. … Burkes v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlbert E. Nasser v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Etc.
723 F.2d 1437 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 20, 1984
However, Bank Board approval was required and obtained. This case is distinguishable from Fort Worth National Corp. v. … See Federal Home Loan Bank Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublished306 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 1962
Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. … (See Eagle Star & British Dominions v. Tadlock, S.D., Cal., 1938, 22 F.Supp. 545 , 548- 49). It may charge the losing claimants. (Kohler v. Kohler, 9 Cir., 1939, 104 F.2d 38, 41 (dictum); see Board of Education v.
Cited 55 timesPublished440 F. App'x 599 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 2011
CV-04-02813-SBA v. MEMORANDUM * J. BROWN, Respondent - Appellee. … See Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSegovia v. County of Los Angeles
41 F. App'x 126 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 2002
Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 406-07 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Monell v. Department of Soc. Servs. of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690-95 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). There is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983. Brown, 520 U.S. at 403 .
Cited 2 timesPublished13 F. App'x 530 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 21, 2001
. § 2254 (d); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 , 120 S.Ct. 1495, 1523 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000); Van Tran v. … Giglio v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 2023
“Failure to raise an issue in an appeal to the [Board] constitutes a failure to exhaust remedies with respect to that question” under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). Zara v. … We have enforced Section 1252(d)(1) as a mandatory claim-processing rule where lack of exhaustion before the Board is properly raised on appeal. See Umana-Escobar v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedParrakkamannil Varghese v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
720 F.3d 1100 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2013
BROWN , JR., OPINION Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. … Ake v.
Cited 4 timesPublished559 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 25, 1977
Board’s action is conclusive. … “[T]he [§ 1983] right alleged is as plainly federal in origin and nature as those vindicated in Brown v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedCalifornia Ex Rel. Harris v. Safeway, Inc.
651 F.3d 1118 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 12, 2011
Most recently, in Brown v. … Brown, 518 U.S. at 235 , 116 S.Ct. 2116 (quoting Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 50 F.3d 1041, 1056 (D.C.Cir.1995)).
Cited 32 timesPublishedNelson ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local No. 32
35 F.3d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 5, 1994
On May 21, 1992, Olympic entered into a settlement agreement with the Board and the Union. … Kobell v. United Food and Commercial Workers, 788 F.2d 189, 194-95 (3d Cir.1986).
Cited 1 timesPublished176 F.3d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1999
."); see also Board of County Comm'rs of Bryan County v. … the Board.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States v. Gustavo Alvarado, United States of America v. Oscar Oqueli-Hernandez
838 F.2d 311 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 1988
See United States v. … (quoting United States v. Rea, 532 F.2d 147, 149 (9th Cir.1976)). As the Supreme Court in Rose v.
Cited 70 timesPublished5 F. App'x 629 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 2001
See Tanious v. IRS, 915 F.2d 410, 411 (9th Cir. 1990). … See Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (“One who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles to excuse that lack of diligence.”).
Cited 1 timesPublished112 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 7, 1940
In Belden v. … NOTES [1] See The Coventina, D.C., 52 F. 156, 158 , where Judge Brown states The M. M. Chase was affirmed on appeal.
Cited 19 timesPublishedGeneral Teamsters Local No. 162 v. National Labor Relations Board
782 F.2d 839 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 11, 1986
Sec. 160 (f), and if the Board correctly applied the law. Carpenters Union Local No. 25 v. NLRB, 769 F.2d 574 , 579 (9th Cir.1985). See Universal Camera Corp. v. … Standard of Review 21 The Board's discretion in the selection of appropriate remedies is exceedingly broad and is to be given special respect by reviewing courts. NLRB v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna