Case law

Thomas Phillip Nehez v. National Transportation Safety Board and Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

30 F.3d 1165 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 26, 1994

NTSB, 572 F.2d 202 , 203 n. 3 (9th Cir.1977) (per curiam), among other cases, and has been consistently applied by the Board in fixed-wing aircraft cases. Relying upon Essery v. … The Board’s finding of potential for harm is supported by the evidence. Nehez’s reliance on Administrator v. Westhoff, NTSB Order No. EA-3596 (1992) is unavailing.

Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. University of Oregon

249 F.3d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 9, 2001

See Matthews v. Oregon State Bd. of Higher Educ., 220 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir.2000). A companion appeal, Matthews v. Oregon, No. 99-35601, has been pending, with submission deferred, awaiting the outcome of this appeal. … See Matthews v. Oregon State Bd. of Higher Educ., 332 Or. 31 , 22 P.3d 754 (2001).

National Labor Relations Board v. Orfeo Kostrencich, Fishermen's Union, Local 33, Ilwu, Intervenor

296 F.2d 561 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 13, 1961

On balance, it is not believed by this Court that enforcement of the Labor Board’s order would promote either industrial peace or the collective bargaining process which are purposes of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 … The board’s remedy, because of a condition ,in a prior contract which seems not to have been enforced, would now deprive the employees of any representation for a period.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 10, I.L.W.U

214 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1954

That evidence, and the report of the Trial Examiner, support the order of the Board. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S. Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; N. L. R. B. v. … The Board’s Order will be enforced.

Retail Store Employees Union, Local 428, Retail Clerks International v. National Labor Relations Board

528 F.2d 1225 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1975

On review, the Board voted 3 to 2 to reverse the administrative law judge. If there is continuity of representation, there is no requirement for a Board election. See N.L.R.B. v. … Subsequent board decisions have found continuity in the merger of two locals under the particular facts of those mergers. See, e. *1228 g., N.L.R.B. v. Commercial Letter, Inc., supra.

Cohen v. United States

144 F.2d 984 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 29, 1944

United States, 9 Cir., 17 F.2d 339, 343 ; Browne v. United States, 6 Cir., 290 F. 870, 872 ; Rembrandt v. United States, 6 Cir., 281 F. 122 . … In that case and those cited by appellant Schnee as following it — Anderson v. United States, supra; Runnels v. United States, 9 Cir., 138 F.2d 346 ; United States v. Hoffman, 2 Cir., 137 F.2d 416 ; Gros v.

Micronesian Telecommunications Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

820 F.2d 1097 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 1987

See NLRB v. … Best Products Co., 765 F.2d 903, 906-07 (9th Cir.1985), and we will not overturn a Board decision to certify a union unless the Board has abused that discretion. NLRB v.

Schuett v. Brown

76 F.3d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 25, 1996

Robert SCHUETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs; Robert E. Lindsey, Jr.; Paul J. … See Washington v.

O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional Center

502 F.3d 1056 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 2007

See Jones v. … Relying on the statement in Brown v.

Beverly Hills Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Eugene Webb, Jr., Marguerite R. Webb, Richards Matthews, Jr., Robert G. Rufi and Eugene C. Jones, Beverly Hills Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Title Insurance and Trust Company

406 F.2d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 30, 1969

See Reich v. Webb, 9 Cir., 336 F.2d 153 , and Webb v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings and Loan Assn., 9 Cir., 364 F.2d 146 . … The decision of this court in Reich v. Webb, 9 Cir., 336 F.2d 153 , supports the Board's view.

Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Schumacher Wall Bd. Corp.

93 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1937

We agree with the holding of the Board. … Equally conclusive of the present appeal are Hazeltine Corporation v. Commissioner (C.C.A.3) 89 F.2d 513, 518 , Bassick v.

Hacienda La Puente Unified School District Of Los Angeles v. William Honig

976 F.2d 487 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 28, 1992

Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 192 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3043 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498, 1504 (D.C.Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).

Rossum v. Patrick

622 F.3d 1262 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 23, 2010

Gomez v. … Alberni v. McDaniel, 458 F.3d 860, 873 (9th Cir.2006); see also Insyxiengmay v. Morgan, 403 F.3d 657, 669-70 (9th Cir.2005).

Kenneth W. Natale v. United States of America, United States Board of Parole

424 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 1970

In Smith v. … In United States v.

Cecile Brown v. John Coughenour

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 28, 2021

Cecile Andrea Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. … The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Brown’s motion for reconsideration because Brown failed to establish any basis for relief. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v.

Brian Brown v. Atty Gen Nvr

613 F. App'x 608 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 2, 2015

See Cano v. Taylor, 739 F.3d 1214, 1220 (9th Cir. 2014). In fact, the context surrounding Brown’s post-exhaustion petitions indicates that Brown intended only to supplement his original petition, not to supplant it. … See United States v.

Hotel Employees And Restaurant Employees Union, Local 11 v. National Labor Relations Board

760 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 16, 1985

Discussion 29 This court reviews Board standards for rationality and consistency with the Act. NLRB v. Nevis Industries, Inc., 647 F.2d 905 , 909 (9th Cir.1981). See also Ford Motor Co. v. … See, e.g., NLRB v. Brooks Camera, supra, 691 F.2d at 919 ; Lippincott Industries v. NLRB, supra, 661 F.2d at 114 ; Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. NLRB, 565 F.2d at 1080 ; NLRB v.

Houston v. Governing Board of the Encinitas Union School District

321 F. App'x 632 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 6, 2009

No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. AC & S, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm. … See id. at 1263 ; see also Straw v. Bowen, 866 F.2d 1167, 1171-72 (9th Cir.1989) (construing a Rule 59 motion as a Rule 60 motion where it was not filed within 10 days of the judgment).

United States v. Antwan Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2013

No. 8:07-cr-00296-DOC v. MEMORANDUM * ANTWAN EUGENE BROWN, a.k.a. Antwon Eugene Brown, Defendant - Appellant. … We have provided Brown the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

Rainbow Tours, Inc. D/B/A Rainbow Coaches v. National Labor Relations Board

835 F.2d 1436 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 1987

(BNA) 2952 Rainbow Tours, Inc. d/b/a Rainbow Coaches v. National Labor Relations Board NO. 86-7630 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.